Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

interesting then cause ive got a 3inch jap muffler sitting in shed, sounded pretty angry on the rb but quiet on idle and cruise, be interesting to fit it up, pitty I cant weld myself cause exhaust shops are a rip off,

the cannon could be hidden from view so wouldn't be seen, just a 3inch pipe

so to clarify is the exhaust size universal, eg 2.5inch gets your 250kw, 3inch for 300kw etc as a rough rule?

Well, no. First up the LSx exhausts are typically twin systems and so 2 x 2.5" (~39 in2 area) is a fair bit more flow than 1 x 3" (~28 in2 area) Skyline system. Also the (catback) piping itself is often not the restriction, it's the other bits like cats and mufflers. Stock headers can also restrict flow if you're running big numbers.

Whilst thats completely true (its maths!)

Is the flow really required? A 3inch straight through muffler probably flows more than the stock rear dual resonator.

I'm sure I've seen flow calculators online for exhausts. It would be very interesting to see what an ls engine can flow through the stock exhaust.

Having to pay a shop to do it does suck. That's where I'm lucky having the equipment to mess around with an exhaust to get it where i want it.

Pipe Diameter (inches) Pipe Area (in2) Total CFM (est.) Max HP Per Pipe Max HP For A Dual Pipe System

1 1/2 1.48 171 78 155

1 5/8 1.77 203 92 185

1 3/4 2.07 239 108 217

2 2.76 318 144 289

2 1/4 3.55 408 185 371

2 1/2 4.43 509 232 463

2 3/4 5.41 622 283 566

3 6.49 747 339 679

3 1/4 7.67 882 401 802

3 1/2 8.95 1029 468 935

Thanks Ben C34, let's try this table again:

16070880314_2ec9c405c4.jpg

I see where they're coming from but I would still take the HP readings as indicative only.

For instance, I'm running 285 rwkw without air filter or lid. This is about 380 hp in the old money. Assuming 20% driveline loss would make this 475 hp at the engine. This is all through a 3" turbo back exhaust system - yet the table above suggests Max HP of 339 for this pipe diameter.

Now it's all getting awfully academic :)

Fuel and boost also make a difference to the pipe diameter required.

At the moment I make close to 500HP at the engine on E85 through a 3" pipe but that doesn't mean I can't make more by going bigger.

For 250-300rwkw on an LS1, a single 3" pipe would be fine.

  • Like 2

I had a similar conversation with a c63 owner, he was fitting an Xforce twin 3 inch system (don't know why, don't ask) and was told the 100 cell race cats I fitted had to go, his tuner said they would make the car detonate.

The exhaust would have been good for 600+kw ffs.

Bloody mail order tuners.

  • Like 1

I love my twin 3" DPE on my LS3

Sounds excellent... And of course drone @ 80km/h in 6th, that's just a given.

Note definitely changed after the first 200km too, much deeper... That said I got it REAL hot fast, most would probably take 1,000km to do that.

so do they drone less after a 1000km's? Might be worth leaving it on for a few thousand km's if its going to get better, the sound I thought it was going to make was the sound that it made with the resonator taken off the back , so just the 2 center mufflers and open at the diff, nice and deep, meaty.

and yeah drone is at that 1300-1600rpm, right where the auto likes to be on a cruise.

Edited by AngryRB

I love my twin 3" DPE on my LS3

Sounds excellent... And of course drone @ 80km/h in 6th, that's just a given.

Note definitely changed after the first 200km too, much deeper... That said I got it REAL hot fast, most would probably take 1,000km to do that.

You're comparing thrashing and getting the exhaust really hot and bedding in, to driving around the street like a normal person. The exhaust will take longer than 1k to bed in.

I love my twin 3" DPE on my LS3

Sounds excellent... And of course drone @ 80km/h in 6th, that's just a given.

Note definitely changed after the first 200km too, much deeper... That said I got it REAL hot fast, most would probably take 1,000km to do that.

Nice system, it's the one I would have got had I a spare 3k at the time.

You can't really lose with a bigger exhaust for an LS - for me its just ground clearance that is the issue! Single 3" will sound like shit and will be a restriction btw.

On the Di Fillippo website it actually talks about how they typically reduce the pipe size after the diff to keep gas speed up and that's what creates the best sound, but my catback system is 2 1/2inch to the tip,

I had a worked VS ute before this one, had stroker, cams, diff gears, 3inch exhaust but only a 2.5inch tip pointed to the ground, every time it started it was like the world was about to end, could hear it from blocks away,

I'm gonna just run it for a few thousand km's, drive it like I stole it lol :yes:

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone know much about extractors?

Im stuggling to decide wether to get TRY Y 1 5/8 with 2.5inch outlet OR 4 into 1, 1 3/4 with 3inch outlet...

A few things ive read are that the 4 into 1's will give it a great V8 beat to it but may loose torque on bottom end, other people say that when the car is tuned you wont loose bottom end but gain everywhere and just to choose for sound?

If the difference isn't that noticeable then im thinking the big 4 into 1's look the business.

have you tried the two on the same car? Ive asked quite a few exhaust shops and they cant give a definite answer, I spoke to Hi Torque Performance, and he said the 4 into 1 will be fine and they don't lose any bottom when tuned??

but need more opinions before spending this amount of money...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...