Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sorry to bring up this thread again however i have recently found out about mambatek turbos, they seem to be of the same quality of kando turbos and the same price range except ball bearing :D and have been looking at this turbo in particular:
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MAMBA-GTX-Ball-Bearing-Turbocharger-GTX3063R-Nissan-Skyline-GTR-R31-RB20DET-300P-/181736850896?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_15&hash=item2a505c45d0

not knowing much about turbos myself would someone please tell me how this would work out on an rb20 lag/power wise? would be a great help if possible thanks

it is tempting and seems good value for money, i was going to get a kinugawa td05 18g 8cm before i found this
specs td05:
Compressor wheel: 50.5/68 mm

Turbine wheel: 49.2 / 56 mm

8cm housing

journal bearing

specs gtx3063r

Comp. Wheel : 47.1 mm / 63 mm/Trim 56 (11+0 GTX Billet Wheel w/ Extend Tip)

Turbine Wheel : 52 mm / 56.5 mm / Trim 84

ceramic dual ball bearing

10cm housing

This is the cropped GT30 turbine wheel not the real gt30 one.

It may perform anyway as the compressors is not that big.

I have the kinugawa version with much bigger turbine (garrett stage 3 wheel which is 65mm at the inducer), and a 20g compressor (52.5/68mm wheel).

With an EBC in good working order I was able to get 19 psi/1.3b at 4000rpm, without EBC I only get 14psi/0.9b at the same rpm and the engine doesn't relly wake up before 3500/3800rpm with a front facing plenum.

It was able to give 198rwkw/320 Nm at this boost through a standard S13 airbox and paper filter in it, FMIC, front facing plenum and 3 inch turboback.

This mambatek will spool fairly quicker maybe not as quick as you'd want, power wise I've no ideas but it will be able to break the 250 rwkw I guess.

In the same range of size sonic performance offers bolt-ons solutions based on the GT2860RS and GTX2860/2863/2867 but it ain't cheap.

too much hassle to get an adaptor and custom dump honestly, i've seen the range sonic performance offers and its probably a bit too much for me price wise, R_34 is your rear housing a 10cm or 8cm?

i can deal with it being at full boost by 3500, put a boost guage in recently and turns out my rb25 turbo is hitting 12psi by about 3400 and 7 at 2800 so that was a bad call on my part, sounds interesting, need some supporting mods before i get my turbo anyway so if i havnt gotten a turbo before 6 months i'll have a look at that too, the only thing putting me off this mamba turbo is the 10cm turbine housing

and what does your 25 turbo do at 6000, is it still holding 12psi?

My SS2.5 hyflow makes positive boost @ 2.8K and 20psi @ 3.8 and keeps it to 7500rpm

Not sure what kilowatts it make as I tune it myself

all my passengers have a big grin @ 4000

Mine is a 10cm², and it holds boost perfectly all the way to the rev limiter à 8200rpm when I was running 19psi.

I backed off because of the EBC and the gearbox which didn't liked the "high" boost.

Positive pressure begin in the low 2K but the turbo is lazy to gain boost and doesn't hit 0.5b before 3000 rpm with the ebc and 3500 without.

going by what you're saying the mamba turbo should spool faster than your kinugawa turbo with the smaller wheels and being ball bearing, if the housings are the same size it shouldnt be a problem for me then

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...