Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

im coming to this forum in need of great assistance lol

ive been reading posts from all over the forums about rb's.

ive tried putting this question on Zilvia.net but no one could help

so here it is.

i have a 96 s14 with an Rb25det Series 1.

im using wiring specialties harness .

Freddy intake

FMIC

MBC.

Rb20 FLASHED ECU

now for some odd reason my car has poor performance at 15 degrees timing

it drives fine idles ok and there are no hickups to the powerband other than it being rediculously slow.

now i have fully advanced the timing and it runs OK. i can barely pull from my buddys stock 350z when im running 12psi.

at stock psi its still slow lol

things ive tried:

Checked timing belt at least 5 times to be sure it wasnt a tooth off.

replaced maf cause i had a bad one.

changed plugs gapped down to .26

waiting to try my buddys CAS so see if mine is f'd up

i havent had a chance to see if my ecu is pulling timing when high revving with a timing light

my main concern is why do i have to run fully advanced timing ?

btw at 15* if i try to run 12 psi it detonates like crazy.

there are no ecu codes

no vacuum leaks

no boost leaks.

my buddys stock 1jz s13 is way faster than my rb. wth

any help greaty appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455439-rb25-s14-advanced-timing/
Share on other sites

I think .26mm plug gap is WAAAAYYYY to small. Your engine should be capable of using near stock gap of 1.1mm. Maybe 1mm should be the least you would need.

Some timing lights give a reading double the actual timing. The safest way to get a proper timing is to use an old spark plug lead inserted between #1 coil and #1 spark plug, then set the timing "old school".

And was the ecu flashed on a dyno, or is it something someone says worked in another car?

I think .26mm plug gap is WAAAAYYYY to small. Your engine should be capable of using near stock gap of 1.1mm. Maybe 1mm should be the least you would need.

Some timing lights give a reading double the actual timing. The safest way to get a proper timing is to use an old spark plug lead inserted between #1 coil and #1 spark plug, then set the timing "old school".

And was the ecu flashed on a dyno, or is it something someone says worked in another car?

These were pretty much my thoughts

You dont have the locator broken off the cam and have the CAS a tooth out?

The ECU was flashed to run 12psi? If it were me id get a 25 ECU and see if that improves things. Sounds like it would run better with a stock ECU anyway. Turn boost down to around 7psi

Edited by 89CAL

I've tried running with the stock ecu and it

Idles horribly rough to where it stalls.

But driving it on stock boost it feels Ok.

Yes that is how I checked timing.

I inserted a plug wire into coil #1 and set at 15* after disconnecting the tps

As far as the vvt I haven't checked anything for that yet.

This ecu is just flashed to run stock rb25 but I'm using a boost controller to creep the boost to 12 psi.

Yes I'm waiting to try another cas maybe tomorrow cause my buddy has an s2 rb25.

The harness continuity should be good since I'm using wiring specialties harness, but nevertheless thats not to say it can't be f*d up haha

Another thing I'm going to try is the knock sensors, maybe its sending a false signal to the ecu.

Compression ratios are

130

130

130

135

129

130

I don't remember if that was warmed up or not lol

What's happening with the VVT and the 20 ecu?

This! Latest Nistune stuff will allow RB20 ECU to run VCT, but as far as I know it is not possible to make it happen without Nistune. Ergo this RB25 is running without VCT. And that means that the fuel and timing maps both are not optimised in the half of the map where VCT is not working properly. Therefore it is not running "stock" maps in quite the way that it would run them if VCT was working. This might not explain all of this engine's problems, but it would certainly explain why it doesn't drive nice.

Edited by GTSBoy

i have removed the Catalyst and im running a 3" straight pipe from the turbo back

yes it did run a little better then the rb20 ecu, sounded quieter and felt like a tab bit

more power.

then with the stock ecu i moved the timing to 15* and it ran super slow as hell and idles like shit.

my check engine light was even blinking lol i didnt even know it works lol

so only fully advanced does the car feel ok.

im going to try a CAS tomorrow

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...