Jump to content
SAU Community

What Was She Thinking


skylinesteve
 Share

Recommended Posts

So the latest dick-head of the week, as I'm sure most of u would of heard about, was the Skyline doing 200 odd kays up Western Ring Road on L plates. Wow! Come on, this is why the police target performence cars, because there has to be a wanker who dosen't care for their lives or people around them. I think it shouldn't have happend. This is why it's becoming harder to go out and have a good cruise on a Sunday. What makes these people think ???? Share your thoughts on this please.

so the latest dick dick head of the week so as im sure most of u would of herd about the skyline doing 200 odd kays up west ring road on L plates wow come on this is why the police target performence cars because there has tobe a wanker who dosent care for there lives or people around them i think it shouldent have happend this is why its becomeing harder to go out and have a good cruse on a sunday what makes these people think ???? some times shear your thought on this please
Inserted some puncuations far ya :D A fullstop next time at least to help break up sentences.

Shan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she was on her L plates than it is the fault of the supervising driver. I cant believe that a parent or anyone else for that matter who is over 21 could allow someone who is only 16/17 to drive that fast, and sit next to them in the car! Idiots

They should be shot, its called euthanasia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ring Road is definitely not the place to give the speedo a shake...

Regardless of the cameras.

I wonder what it would have been like if this forum was around 30 years ago. I can bet you we would be having "These new 0.05 laws are BS" threads every week. Because we would all be confident we know our limits. It is the same with our current attitude to speeding. We all think we are able to be responsible and pick the right time...

But how does the government work out which of us our kidding ourselves and which of us actually are responsible. Easiest solution is to get rid of the question ban all speeds above which Mr Clueless in his crapmobile can get into trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

was she pulled over or just caught by the camera's?

my guess is she is gonna fight and say that the camera's are broken and arent working and try to get away with it, meaning that she could of possibly planned it out like that.

hopefully she gets smacked on the head

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol doxx

she just got busted driving again!!!! omg what a tard... she wasnt speeding but she got caught driving again by herself without her L plates up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
    • Thanks for updating the outcome; while anywhere in the system could leak, I hadn't heard of a wastegate actuator doing so before, can add that to the list of potentials for next time
×
×
  • Create New...