Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am looking at a fairly standard rb25det skyline for a friend that has a dump pipe which looks the same as this on it with a divided plumb back.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/JDM-PRO-NISSAN-SKYLINE-RB20-RB25-R32-R33-EXHAUST-TURBO-DUMP-FRONT-PIPE-RB25-/181239136372?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_15&hash=item2a32b1c074&vxp=mtr

The car is having some serious boost creep issues. It is running a standard 5psi wastegate actuator with no boost controler and is creeping to over 12psi above 5000rpm

Boost holds steady 5psi at lower RPM

I have checked the flapper movement angle and it is a little less than 90 degrees

Has anyone had any similar issues with these?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/457742-divided-down-pipes-and-boost-creep/
Share on other sites

Waste gate flap is probably hitting the split pipe

Happens all the time on those.

But he said the flapper is moving almost 90 degrees.

Maybe try disconnecting the actuator so the gate will be blown full open and go for a run (with epic lag) to see if it still creeps up the top end. If so, the its a hot side/exhaust problem.

Assuming you take off the actuator arm to move it freely and be aware than most of the time the lever is not parallel to the gate flap.

I would be measuring it with the dump off/on and compare the 2.

Also making sure there is no crazy preload on the actuator arm if it has been taken off before..

Parallel doesn't matter though, it's the fact it moves 90 from the closed position.

The flap could still be on strutted y a shit flange, or the rerun merge of the waste gate pipe could be horrible.

I haven't had any issues with my dump pipe. It's got 2 different pipes altogether and merges just before the front pipe. It was custom made to fit my standard turbo and assumed it would never work with the SS2 turbo I'm running now but had no issues with install or tuning, and no issues with boost creep or anything else.

Made 320rwkw on an unopened 25det neo with E85 on the standard manifold and full boost is right on 4000rpm

Maybe I got lucky? Or because its custom made it fit better?

Think about it. If you are running decent boost, then 99% of the time the wastegate is closed, which means the turbo has a 3 or 3.5 inch dump to get rid of the exhaust flow. Only when the gate opens does it add to that flow.

Most split pipes do restrict, as the turbo pipe is only 2 1/4 or 2 1/2 instead of 3 or 3 1/2. I can nearly guarantee upgrading to a decent bellmouth will improve response, just due to the increase in pipe size available to the turbo.

Realistically at 300kw you want a 3.5 inch dump at least, this can be tapered back to 3 inch after the cat as the exhaust gas has contracted as it cools, and it cools fast. The dump isn't the place to restrict the exhaust, here bigger is best.

  • Like 1

Think about it. If you are running decent boost, then 99% of the time the wastegate is closed, which means the turbo has a 3 or 3.5 inch dump to get rid of the exhaust flow. Only when the gate opens does it add to that flow.

Most split pipes do restrict, as the turbo pipe is only 2 1/4 or 2 1/2 instead of 3 or 3 1/2. I can nearly guarantee upgrading to a decent bellmouth will improve response, just due to the increase in pipe size available to the turbo.

Realistically at 300kw you want a 3.5 inch dump at least, this can be tapered back to 3 inch after the cat as the exhaust gas has contracted as it cools, and it cools fast. The dump isn't the place to restrict the exhaust, here bigger is best.

Good point. I had a split dump on my 25DET and people talked about the dangers of the W/G flap catching (it didn't on mine) but no-one mentioned the much smaller dump pipe - obvious in retrospect ...but not at the time!

Been a bit busy at work but I got a chance to attack it the other night.

He picked it up yesterday and I haven't heard back from him but i"m assuming it will fix his issues.

Plumb back was partially blocked, I think this was the main part of the issue.

74b58bd2-63e0-4ac7-ad2d-443dee33ee2c_zps

53ae6aa4-ab32-4bb6-a03e-1ddb0b318082_zps

IMG_2863_zpsn1u9libs.jpg

Truly an awful effort on that one!

I must say though, that I disagree strongly on the whole "biggest volume after the turbine outlet possible" school of thought. Respected turbo people (read, dev engineers at Garrett) have stated publicly that the very best turbine dump is a conical taper expansion from the diameter of the turbine outlet up to the diameter of the required dump pipe size. Said conical expansion needing to be about 10° included angle, or somesuch small angle. Of course that is a little difficult to package in an engine bay, so we do have to accept compromises. But as far as I am concerned, the "smaller" turbine pipe that results from a split dump is not an issue, provided it is as nicely shaped in terms of the expansion and the bend downward as possible. In fact, a smaller turbine pipe actually makes it easier to get a more respectable conical expansion and a slightly more decent looking bend down than going straight to the largest pipe. The fringe benefits of keeping the nasty turbulence of the gate exhaust flowing sideways into the turbine exhaust, right at the point where the turbine flow exits the casting is almost a bonus, rather than the original aim of the design.

Of course, I have nothing good to say about the divided dumps (the HKS ones and the copies thereof) where the return was really close to the top. They do need to take the WG gases as far downstream as possible before putting them back in.

I agree that obtaining the best pressure drop across the turbine is the goal. But I disagree that a drainpipe dump is the way to achieve that.

Edited by GTSBoy

I've read that too, the conical tapering out from the turbine housing is the 'ideal' design (due to gasses exiting in a spiral fashion?) and with this in mind thought the split pipe would work best, as it did have a nice conical taper at the start of the pipe from the flange. But, I bought both a split pipe (wen the extra mile of ported flanges to give a good smooth entry taper to both pipes) and a bellmouth pipe, and tested back to back....bellmouth was much better, car pulled noticeably harder. I put it down to one of those 'ideal on paper but not in use' things....as in, if you were designing a setup completely from scratch you could come up with a better setup, but fitting a premade product into a premade space and throwing in only 1 aspect of the 'ideal' design like the conical taper, just doesn't cut it so the 'as much space as possible, as soon as possible' design of the bellmouth worked best.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...