Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First of all, this is a discussion around understanding the potential differences between Stagea's and Skylines, to understand why there may be less power achieved whilst having similar mods rather an expectations.

Secondly, it is also to discuss and understand the differences between using different qualities of products and results achieved, as some people have reliably achieved good performance gains from using less superior products and parts. This is not to mention that everyone has different build/upgrade budgets and its a means of determining whats myth and fact.

Thirdly, I'm not sure what the relevance of your post really is besides trying to be sarcastic, which seems to be the common traits of most keyboard warriors on this site and forum. If you don't have anything relevant or useful to say keep your heroic bullshit to yourself as its a waste of everyone's time. I would have thought that the whole point of this site is to get enthusiast together to constructively talk about a common interest in cars etc.

By putting that post up, what were you really trying to achieve other than wasting 5 mins of your time being a keyboard warrior, rather than trying to provide some constructive feedback/advice????

Seriously...

  • 9 months later...

M35 Stagea

Just fitted Denso 570's and E-manage.

Previous mods include : Scotty dump, Legalis R exhaust, AMPerformance intake, ATP High flow and Greddy FV BOV

219 kw at 16psi.

Whilst that was pretty much my goal, top end power wasn't important to me.

I was hoping to run over 20 psi but stock intercooler appears to be inadequate.

High air temps and high risk of DET so tuned back for safety.

Previosly had a boost-t in place as there was massive boost creep with the factory solenoid.

Probably due to the 1mm restrictor in the vac line, which I discovered later.

My Turbosmart boost-t was stuck out the whole time I had it fitted and didn't even realise. It didn't turn anti anymore whilst the plunger was out 15mm.

Was hitting boost cut.

Currently running straight of Scottys actuator spring, holds 16 psi nicely. No boost controller at all.

So overall, can runs nicely but a bit disappointed in low down accelleration.

Car went harder pretune with stock injectors.

So hoping HDI GT2 Pro will make the difference, then back on the dyno.

Dyno1.pdf

M35 Stagea

Just fitted Denso 570's and E-manage.

Previous mods include : Scotty dump, Legalis R exhaust, AMPerformance intake, ATP High flow and Greddy FV BOV

219 kw at 16psi.

Whilst that was pretty much my goal, top end power wasn't important to me.

I was hoping to run over 20 psi but stock intercooler appears to be inadequate.

High air temps and high risk of DET so tuned back for safety.

Previosly had a boost-t in place as there was massive boost creep with the factory solenoid.

Probably due to the 1mm restrictor in the vac line, which I discovered later.

My Turbosmart boost-t was stuck out the whole time I had it fitted and didn't even realise. It didn't turn anti anymore whilst the plunger was out 15mm.

Was hitting boost cut.

Currently running straight of Scottys actuator spring, holds 16 psi nicely. No boost controller at all.

So overall, can runs nicely but a bit disappointed in low down accelleration.

Car went harder pretune with stock injectors.

So hoping HDI GT2 Pro will make the difference, then back on the dyno.

Stock turbo still?

If the car felt stronger pre-tune, then Jez likely took timing out of the midrange. Most tuners will do that to protect the engine, these VQ's run a lot of timing off boost, and it's hard to talk a tuner into leaving the timing in there.

  • 1 month later...

So after new intercooler and changing boost from 16 to 20 , car feels great.

Powerful smooth accelleration.

Still have a slight rumble on idle, tbc

219 to 237 kw.

ATP high flow still hangin in there- slight whine - suspect minor shaft warpage on a boost cut pre tune.

570 densos

HDI GT2

Walbro 255

e-manage

Fujitsubo Legalis-R

post-25026-0-61183000-1466822358_thumb.jpg

Edited by conan7772
  • Like 1

So after new intercooler and changing boost from 16 to 20 , car feels great.

Powerful smooth accelleration.

Still have a slight rumble on idle, tbc

219 to 237 kw.

ATP high flow still hangin in there- slight whine - suspect minor shaft warpage on a boost cut pre tune.

570 densos

HDI GT2

Walbro 255

e-manage

Fujitsubo Legalis-

Good result! (Please turn chart right way up in future - bad for my neck...)

  • Like 1
  • 11 months later...
  • 5 months later...

 

On 5/26/2017 at 8:25 PM, DaveBb said:

C34 S2 AWD 

20877_10153702976244842_3575515112978108294_n.jpg

12670882_10153702976204842_1379817398439077046_n.jpg

can you please provide a breakdown of mods done to achieve what you've got there?

I have a series 2 auto and am looking to get around the same numbers, so would be interested to see what is required to get in that ball park.

The info is on the second chart:  Nistune chip, Z32 afm, 3in exhaust, stock manifolds, GTX36/71 and E85 fuel but it looks like still with SMIC.

I would suggest for you Nistune chip, Z32 AFM, suitable Hypergear turbo, 3in exhaust, FMIC and ID1000 or 750 injectors (I know the injectors look too big but these modern injectors will work well at low duty cycles).

To quote admS15:

Hypergear highflowed stock turbo will give you a bit more and will hold boost better up top and is direct bolt on. Power does tail off around 6500rpm but can make around 250-260rwkw and costs around $900.  Only negative thing about it is its journal bearing. Still works good. I have one, made 260kw on 98 and 312 on e85.

it is FMIC on those dyno pulls , SMIC wrong on print out , also runs forged pistons , big injectors , nitto 1.8mm head gasket  , ARP rods & studs on the head , previous owner got 248 awkw . has a high stall & shift kit also ... ( my numbers a bit low turns out a sneaky coolant leak into #5 from water gallery past head gasket issue had occurred took awhile to find that . head gasket lasted 10000kms  KiwiRS4T comments re injectors spot on. cheers 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...