Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nono, you have it all wrong. He says;

There is no other genuine 2009 V36 370GT Type SP 7-speed Auto Coupe available in the Australian Market!!!!!!!!

No other GENUINE V36's. Poop loads of Chinese copies tho.

I wonder how often that poor V36 catches its own reflection and just weeps.

haha this thing has been on carsales for atleast 2-3 years i reckon its a dealer posting privately and the shown "car" is not available for sale :P

Edited by AsM

i reckon its a dealer posting privately and the shown "car" is not available for sale :P

I'm thinking the same thing.. especially since the last line of th ad is -

'Also available 2010 Infiniti G37 CONVERTIBLE $69,990!!!'

Which is interesting, as I don't think the V36 convertible was available for import under SEVS, and Infiniti didn't start selling locally until 2012.

Pretty tight clearance on those monster brakes behind the 22s eh.

Is that seriously what you guys have to pay in Aussie or is the seller taking the Michael just a little bit? That's about a $25K car in NZ (about $23K Aus).

Is that seriously what you guys have to pay in Aussie or is the seller taking the Michael just a little bit? That's about a $25K car in NZ (about $23K Aus).

No-one in their right mind would pay $46.5k for a 09 V36 in Aust. Even a 6sp example shouldn't be much more than about $30k

All I know is my '09 SP is insured for $45k at the moment. Before this year's renewal, it was still on the same $55k that I paid to get it on road when I imported it back in Jan 2012.

But yep, since the Japanese market isn't flogging them for anywhere near the $40k FOB I paid back then, then of course it won't be worth that much.

  • 2 weeks later...

Priced to sell!! You wont find another genuine 2009 SP Type V36 370GT, let alone one with so many additional options, in mint condition and at such a competitive price!! ** remember only 10% of all V36 Skyline 370GTs have a sunroof and even less have the option combination of sunroof, tan leather and wood grain trim.** Please call me. *inc. on road costs Also available 2010 Infiniti G37 CONVERTIBLE $69,990!!!

^ That is an Excellent Excellent.

giphy.gif

And despite the noise I've made to Carpoint, no changes have been made to the ad. That's pretty much what I expected.

Call me bored but this is proving to be an interesting challenge. There must be a way to kick this guy in the nuts. :)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...