Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After seeing the demon eyes in my build thread a user (Adz2332) from the forums contacted me to do a budget RGB demon eyes and black out to stock projectors.

Thought id share the results :yes:
below if a sampling of the colours it can produce. (test were done just powered by a 9v battery so with a controller there would be more options. they are also a lot brighter when powered form a 12v source)

11997979_10154288302274896_421239620_n_z

11995432_10154288295614896_716322962_n_z

11994419_10154288295574896_682630046_n_z

11992614_10154288295624896_216252236_n_z

11992421_10154288295604896_347373291_n_z

11950809_10154288295589896_371032380_n_z

11880777_10154288295594896_1567394801_n_

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459493-r32-rgb-demon-eyes-mod/
Share on other sites

What happens when you turn on the headlights?

headlights act as normal. the RGB stuff is on a separate circuit. can control from a switch or there are smartphone add on's to control it form an app.

if you have them on at the same time as the headlights the throw light normally but if viewed at an angle they a tinge of colour

Well I like messing around with the lights, but I think even with the red, green and blue all on making "white", it would still be a defect magnet as red and blue at the front of a car make the cops rather territorial about their colours.

Even many "white" leds tend to be towards the blue end of the spectrum (8000k or higher), and people have claimed to be defected or fined for that.

Well I like messing around with the lights, but I think even with the red, green and blue all on making "white", it would still be a defect magnet as red and blue at the front of a car make the cops rather territorial about their colours.

Even many "white" leds tend to be towards the blue end of the spectrum (8000k or higher), and people have claimed to be defected or fined for that.

yeah they are on a completely separate circuit to the normal headlights or parkers. only really there for wank. track days or photos and such.

would be stupid to drive around with them strobe-ing different colours and hopefully the person i made them for won't do that

Edited by CRSKmD
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...