Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i have room for a 4" dump but i think that could be over kill.

My exhaust is only a 3" blitz nur spec type r.

So it will have a step wen it goes into that but if that's not a issue i will opt to go bigger then 3 to allow for future mods

The difference in this dyno sheet is e85 and changing my exhaust from a straight through 3" with twin rear pipes to the nur spec type r so i do beleive that the sytem is restrictive most likely the rear cannon section

post-77561-0-02271300-1448565663_thumb.jpeg

Wmdc35 is that exhaust or dump ?

I dont beleive my dump is a restriction but i think 3.5 would be better but i do think my exhaust is a restriction.

I will drop the exhaust next time its on dyno see if i gain all that power up top somethings restricting that.

How do you know if an exhaust is a restriction? Unless you can somehow drop the dump at the turbo flange... otherwise the dump might be the restriction.

Bigger and straighter it is the better usually. Larger diameter at the dump and dropping half an inch around where the cat usually sits seems to work well for me, with the least bending possible.

Yea thats a good point i dont no if the exhaust is the restriction but as u can see on the dyno it dives across and masde the same it did on 98 up top makeing me think its the exhaust as thats what got change with the tune.

It only has a centre round hotdog muffler thing rear muffler/cannon seems to hold 3" through it.

So it is ok to have a stepp in the pipeing doesnt cause funny flow

  • 2 weeks later...

So i spoke to the guy who does my fab he would prefer to do it in 4" instead of 3.5 is there any downsides to this ??. And do i just let it step from 4 to 3 at exhaust or ramp it down vefore itbhits the exhaust. ????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...