Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

i am thinking of sellin my r33 non turbo and upgrading to the turbo the only problem that i have had with mine is the clutch. with the r33 gtst do they have more problems than a non turbo. the one om thinking of getting has a rebuit engine with only 700kms and new clutch and gearbox. do you think i should go ahead and buy it or should i keep my non turbo.

i also wanted to know what are the main things that i should look out for on the gtst when i inspect it

your feedback will be appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46157-buy-a-r33-turbo-or-keep-my-non-turbo/
Share on other sites

but will i get many problems with it being a turbo or does that start when i strat boostin it cause all the engine is stock apart from an airfilter and a supersonic BOV

for everyday driving id say around 11psi would be sweet... you shouldnt get much problems.. hopefully none if its been fresh.

The only problem is that the engine gets wasted quicker with a turbo, but it is much more nicer to drive (w0o0o0o0 b00st). My cars engine is close to a rebuild (running 17Psi) as soon as it gets completely rooted i am shovin in an RB26DETT. Go for the GTS-T.

The only problem is that the engine gets wasted quicker with a turbo, but it is much more nicer to drive (w0o0o0o0 b00st). My cars engine is close to a rebuild (running 17Psi) as soon as it gets completely rooted i am shovin in an RB26DETT. Go for the GTS-T.

Not necessarily.. mine ran 11-12psi for the near 2 years i had it, and the year before it the previous owner ran similar boost. If the engine is in good condition and tuned well with appropriate modifications there should be no problems. Adding an aftermarket turbo running 17psi.. well that is different :) If you keep the stock turbo, you should be able to run 180rwkw or so no problems for years and years if you ask me.

Go for the r33 gts-t.. at the moment seems to be a great time to buy.. some nice ones around 16-17k all around australia it seems.. r32 are too expensive at the moment, and the rb25det is the superior motor.

thanks every1. the gtst im looking at has no modifications to the engine except for a hks pod filter and a turbosmart BOV. it hasnt been boosted. the engine and gearbox has been rebuilt and it has a heavy duty clutch. usually when the engine is rebuilt is anything done to the turbo. if i drive normally changing at 3 rpm but occasionally give it a bit more do u think that the turbo would be alrite or do i have a chance of blowing it

thanks every1.  the gtst im looking at has no modifications to the engine except for a hks pod filter and a turbosmart BOV. it hasnt been boosted. the engine and gearbox has been rebuilt and it has a heavy duty clutch.  usually when the engine is rebuilt is anything done to the turbo.  if i drive normally changing at 3 rpm but occasionally give it a bit more do u think that the turbo would be alrite or do i have a chance of blowing it

Your turbo wont blow unless you start boosting it, the r33 turbo are known as one great turbo when running around 11-12psi.

just dont worry about blowing your turbo if your gunna run more then .85bar.

you say it hasnt been boosted but yet its had an engine rebuild. find out the cause of the engine rebuild. you can shift at red line in every gear and you wont blow the turbo.

if you run 19psi through thr stock turbo then yes you will , stock boost is fine.

i would find out why the engine was rebuilt and what exactly was done, could just be a simple turbo hiflow and the selling is saying its had a rebuilt engine. also the stock gtst clutch is fine for stock engine, seems a bit odd that it has a heavy duty clutch already.

maybe its just me that thinks its odd. anyway ask why it was rebuilt

you say it hasnt been boosted but yet its had an engine rebuild. find out the cause of the engine rebuild. you can shift at red line in every gear and you wont blow the turbo.

if you run 19psi through thr stock turbo then yes you will , stock boost is fine.

i would find out why the engine was rebuilt and what exactly was done, could just be a simple turbo hiflow and the selling is saying its had a rebuilt engine. also the stock gtst clutch is fine for stock engine, seems a bit odd that it has a heavy duty clutch already.

maybe its just me that thinks its odd. anyway ask why it was rebuilt

the engine rebuild was because he said that he didnt want it to die on him. it has had machined heads, new head gaskets and stuff like that. the engine was boosted but when he got the rebuild he brought it back to normal with the stock intercooler, he said the old way attracted attention. that is why the clutch was changed to a heavy duty.

for everyday driving id say around 11psi would be sweet... you shouldnt get much problems.. hopefully none if its been fresh.

WRONG! It would be sweet untill u need to buy a new turbo and possible do a rebuild

Max Boost Stock r33 trubo can run is 12PSI; I would only run around 0.5, 0.6bar (which is around 6/8psi).

With that lvl of boost, you will not get many problems; I was running 0.6bar and wasnt having any problems but now i run stock boost 0.4bar (using my ebc) and i find that it is still as fun as running a high boost lvl and without having to worry about blowing my turbo or anything in my car.

Also running 12PSI, i would say would need a FMIC or an upgrade stock cooler (maybe r34 gt-t cooler)

regardless of how straight the car looks, get a professional to check it out;

a work shop u trust;

its a must;

we got a heap of stuff fixed by the dealer before we picked up our car, and it repayed the cost of the inspection easily;

when i got my car, i spent a heap of time checking out various cars, before settling on a reasonably expenive stocko 4 door; didnt mind paying extra as the car was in super good nic;

since we have had teh car, almost no problems what so ever (i blew up a clutch, not the cars fault)

I ran 12psi on my stock turbo/stock cooler for 3 years, and around 80,000 of the 100,000km I've put on the car, including multiple skidpan days and a couple of trips to the drags. It even had the stock ECU until I put a Mines ECU in for the last 6 months of that. Now I'm running a T3/4, and on 10psi it's heaps quicker than the stocker was on 12psi. I certainly wouldn't say that running 12psi is a recipe for disaster as some people seem to be alluding here, and limiting boost to single figures to stop parts of your engine from exploding is completely unneccessary, but if it helps keep your mind at ease then go for it.

A turbo engine is really no more unreliable than a non-turbo engine. Just look after it and make sure it's tuned properly and you will enjoy many boost-happy years :)

Agree with Spooks on the point about getting it inspected by YOUR mechanic, not one the car yard/person you're buying from suggests. Other things to check are to make sure it idles smoothly, revs cleanly under load, and doesn't smoke excessively. Expect a little black smoke under heavy acceleration, particularly if boost is higher than stock or it has an aftermarket ECU, but anything else (white/blue or if it's pissing out) turn and run. Go up a hill in 4th at 80-ish and nail it. Listen for clutch slip. Pop the bonnet and look for oil leaks around the turbo, and look for excessive blow-by around the hose clamps on the intake. Also when you drive it, check the synchros, if it crunches heavily between gears then the gearbox will need a rebuild. Look at the tyres and check for signs of uneven wear, which can mean either bad wheel alignment, or suspension problems. Also do the usual check for rust, accident repairs, condition, dodginess etc.

This is all stuff that applies to all cars, turbo or NA, Skyline or not. That's all I can think of atm, but there are no doubt other things to check out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...