Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

i am thinking of sellin my r33 non turbo and upgrading to the turbo the only problem that i have had with mine is the clutch. with the r33 gtst do they have more problems than a non turbo. the one om thinking of getting has a rebuit engine with only 700kms and new clutch and gearbox. do you think i should go ahead and buy it or should i keep my non turbo.

i also wanted to know what are the main things that i should look out for on the gtst when i inspect it

your feedback will be appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46157-buy-a-r33-turbo-or-keep-my-non-turbo/
Share on other sites

but will i get many problems with it being a turbo or does that start when i strat boostin it cause all the engine is stock apart from an airfilter and a supersonic BOV

for everyday driving id say around 11psi would be sweet... you shouldnt get much problems.. hopefully none if its been fresh.

The only problem is that the engine gets wasted quicker with a turbo, but it is much more nicer to drive (w0o0o0o0 b00st). My cars engine is close to a rebuild (running 17Psi) as soon as it gets completely rooted i am shovin in an RB26DETT. Go for the GTS-T.

The only problem is that the engine gets wasted quicker with a turbo, but it is much more nicer to drive (w0o0o0o0 b00st). My cars engine is close to a rebuild (running 17Psi) as soon as it gets completely rooted i am shovin in an RB26DETT. Go for the GTS-T.

Not necessarily.. mine ran 11-12psi for the near 2 years i had it, and the year before it the previous owner ran similar boost. If the engine is in good condition and tuned well with appropriate modifications there should be no problems. Adding an aftermarket turbo running 17psi.. well that is different :) If you keep the stock turbo, you should be able to run 180rwkw or so no problems for years and years if you ask me.

Go for the r33 gts-t.. at the moment seems to be a great time to buy.. some nice ones around 16-17k all around australia it seems.. r32 are too expensive at the moment, and the rb25det is the superior motor.

thanks every1. the gtst im looking at has no modifications to the engine except for a hks pod filter and a turbosmart BOV. it hasnt been boosted. the engine and gearbox has been rebuilt and it has a heavy duty clutch. usually when the engine is rebuilt is anything done to the turbo. if i drive normally changing at 3 rpm but occasionally give it a bit more do u think that the turbo would be alrite or do i have a chance of blowing it

thanks every1.  the gtst im looking at has no modifications to the engine except for a hks pod filter and a turbosmart BOV. it hasnt been boosted. the engine and gearbox has been rebuilt and it has a heavy duty clutch.  usually when the engine is rebuilt is anything done to the turbo.  if i drive normally changing at 3 rpm but occasionally give it a bit more do u think that the turbo would be alrite or do i have a chance of blowing it

Your turbo wont blow unless you start boosting it, the r33 turbo are known as one great turbo when running around 11-12psi.

just dont worry about blowing your turbo if your gunna run more then .85bar.

you say it hasnt been boosted but yet its had an engine rebuild. find out the cause of the engine rebuild. you can shift at red line in every gear and you wont blow the turbo.

if you run 19psi through thr stock turbo then yes you will , stock boost is fine.

i would find out why the engine was rebuilt and what exactly was done, could just be a simple turbo hiflow and the selling is saying its had a rebuilt engine. also the stock gtst clutch is fine for stock engine, seems a bit odd that it has a heavy duty clutch already.

maybe its just me that thinks its odd. anyway ask why it was rebuilt

you say it hasnt been boosted but yet its had an engine rebuild. find out the cause of the engine rebuild. you can shift at red line in every gear and you wont blow the turbo.

if you run 19psi through thr stock turbo then yes you will , stock boost is fine.

i would find out why the engine was rebuilt and what exactly was done, could just be a simple turbo hiflow and the selling is saying its had a rebuilt engine. also the stock gtst clutch is fine for stock engine, seems a bit odd that it has a heavy duty clutch already.

maybe its just me that thinks its odd. anyway ask why it was rebuilt

the engine rebuild was because he said that he didnt want it to die on him. it has had machined heads, new head gaskets and stuff like that. the engine was boosted but when he got the rebuild he brought it back to normal with the stock intercooler, he said the old way attracted attention. that is why the clutch was changed to a heavy duty.

for everyday driving id say around 11psi would be sweet... you shouldnt get much problems.. hopefully none if its been fresh.

WRONG! It would be sweet untill u need to buy a new turbo and possible do a rebuild

Max Boost Stock r33 trubo can run is 12PSI; I would only run around 0.5, 0.6bar (which is around 6/8psi).

With that lvl of boost, you will not get many problems; I was running 0.6bar and wasnt having any problems but now i run stock boost 0.4bar (using my ebc) and i find that it is still as fun as running a high boost lvl and without having to worry about blowing my turbo or anything in my car.

Also running 12PSI, i would say would need a FMIC or an upgrade stock cooler (maybe r34 gt-t cooler)

regardless of how straight the car looks, get a professional to check it out;

a work shop u trust;

its a must;

we got a heap of stuff fixed by the dealer before we picked up our car, and it repayed the cost of the inspection easily;

when i got my car, i spent a heap of time checking out various cars, before settling on a reasonably expenive stocko 4 door; didnt mind paying extra as the car was in super good nic;

since we have had teh car, almost no problems what so ever (i blew up a clutch, not the cars fault)

I ran 12psi on my stock turbo/stock cooler for 3 years, and around 80,000 of the 100,000km I've put on the car, including multiple skidpan days and a couple of trips to the drags. It even had the stock ECU until I put a Mines ECU in for the last 6 months of that. Now I'm running a T3/4, and on 10psi it's heaps quicker than the stocker was on 12psi. I certainly wouldn't say that running 12psi is a recipe for disaster as some people seem to be alluding here, and limiting boost to single figures to stop parts of your engine from exploding is completely unneccessary, but if it helps keep your mind at ease then go for it.

A turbo engine is really no more unreliable than a non-turbo engine. Just look after it and make sure it's tuned properly and you will enjoy many boost-happy years :)

Agree with Spooks on the point about getting it inspected by YOUR mechanic, not one the car yard/person you're buying from suggests. Other things to check are to make sure it idles smoothly, revs cleanly under load, and doesn't smoke excessively. Expect a little black smoke under heavy acceleration, particularly if boost is higher than stock or it has an aftermarket ECU, but anything else (white/blue or if it's pissing out) turn and run. Go up a hill in 4th at 80-ish and nail it. Listen for clutch slip. Pop the bonnet and look for oil leaks around the turbo, and look for excessive blow-by around the hose clamps on the intake. Also when you drive it, check the synchros, if it crunches heavily between gears then the gearbox will need a rebuild. Look at the tyres and check for signs of uneven wear, which can mean either bad wheel alignment, or suspension problems. Also do the usual check for rust, accident repairs, condition, dodginess etc.

This is all stuff that applies to all cars, turbo or NA, Skyline or not. That's all I can think of atm, but there are no doubt other things to check out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...