Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know whether the hks evc-s boost controller is dual solenoid? Looking for a boost controller for my R34 GTR. Anyone here used one of these before? Cheers

nope, just a MAC valve (or similar)

Looking at it I wouldn't think so. The best image of the solenoid is the one on rhd japan and that looks like there is only one.

Blitz do a dual solenoid boost controller - have a look at the ebc (?) or edc (?) cant remember which it is id iii. Google the pic of the dual solenoid - it is a lot bigger than the HKS one.

Edited by djr81

When you say dual solenoid do you mean the ability to change between two preset boost levels ?

Then yes the HKS EVC S does do that

i think he means a solenoid for each turbo (34 gtr) i thought you just tee'd the two wastegate lines together and used a single solenoid controller. could be wrong though never had twin turbo...

Nope to both of these. Dual solenoid boost controllers (like the Blitz) claim to offer better boost control. Even on single turbo - it has nothing to do with twin turbo, and nothing to do with two different settings. Different settings can be achieved with as single solenoid without any hassle. You could have dozens of slightly different settings if you wanted. All you have to do is vary the duty cycle.

Nope to both of these. Dual solenoid boost controllers (like the Blitz) claim to offer better boost control. Even on single turbo - it has nothing to do with twin turbo, and nothing to do with two different settings. Different settings can be achieved with as single solenoid without any hassle. You could have dozens of slightly different settings if you wanted. All you have to do is vary the duty cycle.

Really ??, would never have known that was the case

The question is why the OP is asking that question cause both posts are relevant depending on what OP wants to know and why cause he may not know how EBCs work and sither of these posts could be what he wants to actually know

Have the same. I bought a new solenoid unit after one of the two in the original failed.

Back in the olden days (And may still hold true) Blitz used to recommend a single solenoid unit up to a certain psi limit (About one bar I think) and then two above that. When you think about how they work you can see the logic in it.

Really ??, would never have known that was the case

The question is why the OP is asking that question cause both posts are relevant depending on what OP wants to know and why cause he may not know how EBCs work and sither of these posts could be what he wants to actually know

Yeah, I wasn't attacking your post, just clarifying that the various points being discussed were somewhat unrelated.

Yeah, I wasn't attacking your post, just clarifying that the various points being discussed were somewhat unrelated.

I only asked that to clarify what the OP actually wants to know and why, a few people I have talked to about boost controller think dual solenoid mean dual boost levels which is why I asked, and since every pic of the HKS EVC-s show a single solenoid mac valve

The two HKS units I use both have a stepper motor type controller which is different the what the S uses and they both hold boost perfectly as do most all Jap boost controller, I only EBC I have ever had an issue with is the first EBoost, no matter how we set it up it could not catch the factory RB26 twins as they came on boost to fastter then Eboost to react

No point is it is the controlling unit that makes the biggest difference in how they operate and all the big name Jap stuff is good gear

Thanks everyone for their posts. To clarify the question was for dual solenoid as opposed to dual boost settings as I am looking to get a tune done on a power fc with stock turbos but was led to believe that the twin turbos needed a dual solenoid boost controller. Will be looking to upgrade turbos down the track so I have also read that the dual solenoid hold higher boost levels beyond 1 bar more steadily. I was looking into the blitz bc's but their solenoid units are quite large in comparison to others so it is more difficult to hide in the engine bay. Had a greddy profec b II previously in my s15 but not sure how they would go with the twins in the rb. Shame the evc-s unit is only single solenoid as I quite liked the smaller screen and was reasonably priced. Any recommendations would be appreciated or if anyone is looking to sell the ebc let me know. Thanks everyone

Thanks everyone for their posts. To clarify the question was for dual solenoid as opposed to dual boost settings as I am looking to get a tune done on a power fc with stock turbos but was led to believe that the twin turbos needed a dual solenoid boost controller. Will be looking to upgrade turbos down the track so I have also read that the dual solenoid hold higher boost levels beyond 1 bar more steadily. I was looking into the blitz bc's but their solenoid units are quite large in comparison to others so it is more difficult to hide in the engine bay. Had a greddy profec b II previously in my s15 but not sure how they would go with the twins in the rb. Shame the evc-s unit is only single solenoid as I quite liked the smaller screen and was reasonably priced. Any recommendations would be appreciated or if anyone is looking to sell the ebc let me know. Thanks everyone

upgrade to a modern single turbo in your twin scroll, twin gate, divided rear housing fashion... then you won't need to worry about anything like using a t-piece to control 2x turbos, or worrying about 2x oil lines, 2x oil drains, 2x water lines, 2x dumps etc...

#shotsfired

I pick up the feed from the plenium run it to the solenoid I fit on the chassis rail under the brake booster then back to the steel line that runs around the back of the head, this eliminates the factory T under the balance tube and keeps the whole setup pretty well hidden, this is on both my R32 and R34 GTRs

i think he means a solenoid for each turbo (34 gtr) i thought you just tee'd the two wastegate lines together and used a single solenoid controller. could be wrong though never had twin turbo...

So this was correct then

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...