Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I had fun :)

I made 194.6rwkw and I'm still scratching my head trying to work out how :confused: but I'm really impressed with the result :) It was great to meet a few more SAUers too.

Here are a few pics. I didnt get that many coz I left early. If anyone wants the hi-res versions PM me.

195.jpg  

^^This car is actually blue in sunlight :D

Haha, you shouldn't be so surprised Paul, I think you forget just how conservative the old BMT dyno was when you cranked you 160kw.

Wish i could have made it, Imagine what 210+ would have looked like on the selectmaz dyno :wassup:

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Haha, you shouldn't be so surprised Paul, I think you forget just how conservative the old BMT dyno was when you cranked you 160kw.

Wish i could have made it, Imagine what 210+ would have looked like on the selectmaz dyno  :wassup:

BMT's mustve been REALLY conservative!! Either that, or this one is optimistic.

The only mod I've done since the BMT run is a high flow cat. 41rwkw from a cat? I dont think so!

BMT's mustve been REALLY conservative!! Either that, or this one is optimistic.

The only mod I've done since the BMT run is a high flow cat. 41rwkw from a cat? I dont think so!

Where do you take your car now that BMT closed down? I'm still with Sam at complete auto running on the same type of dyno that BMT had. But this ones 4wd :)

Where do you take your car now that BMT closed down? I'm still with Sam at complete auto running on the same type of dyno that BMT had. But this ones 4wd :)

All mods are done by me in my drive way now :D I really havent had a need to take it anywhere else. It will go to Sam next time tho coz he owes me $50 :)

You shouldve come down. 210 wouldve been close to 300 on this dyno :uh-huh:

for some unknown reason my car managed to only run about 5-6 psi on the dyno, on the road it was pulling at least 12-13 psi.

But 180 rwkw's on 5psi sounds ok to me :)

On the dyno there seemed to be a pressure loss occuring though after inspecting the bleed valve and cooler pipes I couldnt find anything obvious, and the car is still pulling as hard as normal on road. Dyno's must put a decent amount of load on the car!

Oh well, was a good day, thanks Steve.

Guest RedLineGTR
Had a great time, was nice to meet all of you and good to give the car a run and get some feedback on my pump problems. Looks like the standard fuel pumps are just plain crappy hey Waz coz mines not getting enough fuel up either! Can cause some nasty knock! Still managed to get a figure of 225kw which was pretty interesting. Thanks to Steve and the guys from Selectmaz for putting on the day and the yummy BBQ! :P

Correction It was 204rwkw The Graph people were looking at was a totally different one, sorry to disappoint but I have a photo of the graph at it seem to be closer to was you got on the ICE dyno.

I got a power figure over 20Kw different from the ice dyno. On the ice dyno i had just under 230Kw and on this one i ran 249.1Kw. Big difference concidering my car had exactly the same setup for both the run at Ice and SelectMaz.

I got a power figure over 20Kw different from the ice dyno. On the ice dyno i had just under 230Kw and on this one i ran 249.1Kw. Big difference concidering my car had exactly the same setup for both the run at Ice and SelectMaz.

hey chris is this your car or your dad's? are you going to drive this on your P's when you turn 18?

Yeah my dad owns it and yes i will be driving it on my P's. Dont tell the cops :)

mate, with 250rwkw it ain't the cops that concerns me, its you... i hope you don't kill yourself!

i should have brought my dad's 86 corvette, may have made just a little bit more power than my auto r32 :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...