Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So this is where we made the mistake. We were very conservative with times. So when we declared the times we declared 2 to 3 seconds slower.

Problem is. Everytime you do quicker than your declared time - you don't get points / laps. If you do on declared time you get bonus points / laps. And if you are slower you get points / laps.

So the trick is to declare a time that you are comfortable doing when track is clear and quick. And then try and do that time or slower.

I didn't realise how hard it was to slow down 2 seconds instead of driving quicker. Every time too fast, we slow down, we lose 4 to 5 seconds, we pick up a bit of speed, we are 2 to 3 seconds quicker than declared time. Hence penalty. Lol

Was a good learning process. Will definitely go back and do it next year. This time better prepared and with better understanding.

Well, in saying that I had an STi sandbag me down the straight. I wasn't ctaching him, but he wasn't pulling away from me for a couple laps then all of a sudden I'm on his ass down main straight, overtake and stay in front then he catches up over the next lap or two.

I wouldn't be surprised if he had timing. I wish I saw the footage that day !!!

would have taken it up to race control lol

I bet $100 he had a timer in there

  • Like 1

Well, in saying that I had an STi sandbag me down the straight. I wasn't ctaching him, but he wasn't pulling away from me for a couple laps then all of a sudden I'm on his ass down main straight, overtake and stay in front then he catches up over the next lap or two.

I wouldn't be surprised if he had timing. I wish I saw the footage that day !!!

would have taken it up to race control lol

I bet $100 he had a timer in there

Won't be surprised really. The way some of them drove. Like us. Trying to manage the timing by slowing down or speeding up. Even that was damn hard! How would they know exactly when to slow down so dramatically if they didn't know the time they are running that lap.

Even us we were timing ourselves with the pit board 1 lap behind. When we see the pit board - it was the lap before.

Next time we run this - we have intercom or we have Walkie talkies in the car - doesn't say we can't have that! Or does it? Lol

Won't be surprised really. The way some of them drove. Like us. Trying to manage the timing by slowing down or speeding up. Even that was damn hard! How would they know exactly when to slow down so dramatically if they didn't know the time they are running that lap.

Even us we were timing ourselves with the pit board 1 lap behind. When we see the pit board - it was the lap before.

Next time we run this - we have intercom or we have Walkie talkies in the car - doesn't say we can't have that! Or does it? Lol

bluetooth!

We were discussing this on the day. What if you had the lap timer on a dash logger like the haltech IQ?

How would they know?

emo is a good example.

Has a lap tinier built into the factory sat nav (have to press the lap button yourself).

How could they stop you using it?

its a regularity, can be slow :D just need to be consistent.

Problem is. It's easier to be quick and consistent. Than to be slow and consistent. So better declare a quicker time than a slow time. Lol

What we learned when we did this race years ago, your better off getting your best time when practicing/qualifying and take .5-1 second off it, that way if you get a blinder of a lap you're still under

  • Like 2

Yeah think we will roll with that next time.

Mistake I made was using Rs3's on practice and then A048's during the race. Not even pushing as hard I was consistently 2 seconds faster.

Big learning during this race and was so much fun being on the track with so many different cars. Cant wait for Phillip Island!!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...