Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had no cat on my Legalis R when I bought the car.

Fitted a 100 cell cat, couldn't notice any loss in power at all (under 5000 rpm )

Also the cat didn't make it any quieter really. Maybe 3-5 dB

Just want it to be legal, plus bonus bung for tuning.

Still over 110 dB.

Over 110db is illegal, right? Whatever you have cat or not. But de-cat is another reason for defect

I know you've already bought your exhaust but the Legalis is the best sounding exhaust for the m35

Purely sexual I tell ya !!

It does flow cause I managed 317kw with a decat front pipe

Very quiet no drone inside the cabin

But loud when you get on it

Yes there is a difference as with the 42.7mm you are actually restricting the flow where as the 60.5 mm silencer (SIS090) is actually the same internal size as the exhaust internal so no flow is restricted. You will need to cut a small amount from the end to allow to fit. I will try and find a pic for you to show

  • Like 1

You need to cut of 32mm of the inner pipe to fit flush. Are you on face book ill tag you in my post.

ordered SIS090 today with special sound absorbing cotton ring to reduce the drony.

post-137368-0-10270200-1459237534_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-82014800-1459237534_thumb.gif

post-137368-0-71093600-1459237537_thumb.jpg

NIS001 is 135mm length, SIS090 is 220mm. i would like to cut 85mm on SIS090, this could make the exhaust air go into the small room then out to atm, like a smaller muffler.

post-137368-0-03705800-1459238142.jpg

Edited by YangLIU

Yeah i dont understand the need for the cotton donut....

The silencer works as the exhaust gasses now exit further towards the rear of the muffler thus less space for noise?

Wow. That cotton ring will do shit all. As will your small gap plan

I'm betting on it. 5 bucks. Cash.

here is a video for that cotton ring. not sure if it is sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSP male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSP reducing bush?
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...