Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So installed xspurt 1000cc top feeds with top feed rail from scotty, Hypergear ss2, int gated, Haltech platinum pro, return flow cooler

Now when I had it tuned it made 281rwkw @17psi but full boost was somewhere at 5400 when I mentioned that it should on sooner the tuner had said there was something odd with the VCT when he was trying to set it, he thought it could have been a timing issue, so I had him check that(it was all fine) he then later contacted me and said it was the wastegate not set correctly, set it and then sorted the mid range, boost at 4400.

Now everything I've seen about the ss2 can have full boost at around 3800rpm, so it now has me wondering if there could actually be an issue with the VCT itself.(if VCT can help boost come on)

So have been searching on here about VCT and looks possible that my VCT is stuck as its giving me good top end but possibly poor low....

I disconnected the VCT and drove it and it feels the same, but I am unsure if it feels the same because it was faulty before hand and has been tuned around it...

The plug itself needs replacing as it doesn't clip on, I used a multimeter at the plug, car on, positive on one pin and neg on chassis and then other pin and chassis and no change at multimeter.  Did it hot and cold if that makes a diff.  Have I done it right? I assumed the positive wire was constantly on and neg switches on/off , so at least one of the pins would be giving me voltage.

I have to take the car back at some point to sort something else out but just want to see if there is anything I can do to ensure its working or not.

 

20160712_105552.jpg

Edited by MatthewT85
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/465813-rb25-possible-vct-issue/
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

is the Halaltech set correctly?

put a multimeter on and rev the car, it should register a voltage change at a specific rpm point (as per your tuner's settng)

ill have to check if its set correctly. it should activate just off idle and deactivate around 5k? correct?

when i rev the car it has to be in gear? another thread i read said it didnt activate without it in gear or something

4 hours ago, hypergear said:

Check and make sure the internal gate is 3mms preloaded. With active vct, you should hear a click on throttle movement

yeah thanks the gate is set to roughly 3mm

8 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

Take the VCT out and wire it directly to see if the actual solenoid works first.

when you say take it out, do you mean take the vct solenoid out of the head and wire it directly to a battery? Also does it matter which pin is pos and which is neg?

3 hours ago, MatthewT85 said:

ill have to check if its set correctly. it should activate just off idle and deactivate around 5k? correct?

when i rev the car it has to be in gear? another thread i read said it didnt activate without it in gear or something

yeah thanks the gate is set to roughly 3mm

when you say take it out, do you mean take the vct solenoid out of the head and wire it directly to a battery? Also does it matter which pin is pos and which is neg?

Yes. No it doesn't matter which way round.

  • 1 month later...

So I've tested the solenoid and it's clicking. Next thing I'm gonna do is cut and solder a new plug on as it isn't staying attached and might be the issue.

Stupid question though. As I have to solder extra wire on so it still reaches the plug I went to buy some.
The wire had 10 amps on it. Other option was 25 amps. Is the 10 amp wire ok to use?

are the set points set correctly on the Haltech? because there's a vac and +ve pressure values that needs to be set.. conenct up the Haltech and press F4, then look for the VCT tab.. I recall it being on the OUTPUT menu, grab a screen shot.

are the set points set correctly on the Haltech? because there's a vac and +ve pressure values that needs to be set.. conenct up the Haltech and press F4, then look for the VCT tab.. I recall it being on the OUTPUT menu, grab a screen shot.


Yeah it wasn't set up as it looks like it wasn't working when I dropped off my car.
So I'm gonna attach a new plug and hopefully that's the issue.
  • 4 weeks later...

7c53fe5b7ddd609def9a1e80dc1244ab.jpg
So this is what it's at atm. What I'm trying to do atm is just work out it it's the settings that's been missed. Or whether I have an issue with the wiring.
I just want to make sure it works so it can be.put on the dunno to be set correctly

thanks, 

will it be ok to drive around with the altered settings?

also if i wanted to test the voltage at the plug after changing the settings, would i just have the car idling at operating temp and use a multimeter, or do i have to have someone put it in gear and clutch in?

I have just looked at an old thread of yours johnny and someone suggested having the car at idle and applying direct power to the solenoid using a battery or something to see if the idle changes, could this be a good test to try before playing with the haltech settings?

your Haltech settings aren't ideal anyway

If you want to test, I suggest this..

set the TPS to 5%, operating temp from 50c, set point at 1000rpm on both vac and boost then hold the revs about 2k and get someone to pull off the plug see if there's a change on engine note.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...