Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Front 20x8.5 +25 245/35 tyres fitment stance offset wheels for v36 skyline coupe.

Rear 20x10 +40 with 275/30 tyres.  could prob even run 295 tyres on the rear 295/30/20 tyres

f35.jpg

f36.jpg

f37.jpg

Vossen VFS1 - Matte Graphite

Wheels:

  • Front: 20x9.5" +25 (Mid Concave)
  • Rear:20x10.5" +40 including 5mm hubcentric spacer (Deep Concave)


Tires:

  • Front: 245/35R20 Continental DWS06
  • Rear: 285/30R20 Continental DWS06

f41.jpg

f42.jpg

f43.jpg

f44.jpg

f45.jpg

f46.jpg

f47.jpg

Edited by R377

Rays Mercury Silver gt30's, front 20x9.5 +20, rear 20x10.5 +27, 235/35/20, 265/30/20

Although i spaced them out a little more with a 5mm spacer.  fronts +15 with 235/35 and rears +22 with 265/30.

Rear has maybe 2mm clearance to fender, but no rubbing, and front has 5mm. Front only rubs when i have another person in the car while doing a u turn, but very slightly.

f57.jpg

f58.jpg

f59.jpg

f60.jpg

f61.jpg

Volk GT-S Mercury silver
19 x 9.5 +17 225/40/19
19 x 10.5 +28 275/35/19
Tein S-Tech springs

rears do rub on big bumps or dips. Im debating going to a 255 rear....not too sure about that yet though

f67.jpg

f68.jpg

f69.jpg

20" Volk GT30 Formula Silver
Front: 20x9.5 with +35 offset
Rear: 20x10.5 with +37 offset

Tires
Yokohama S Drive Tires
Front: 245x35x20
Rear: 285x30x20

Rubbing
No. Liner trimmed and fender bracket completely dremeled. Rubs on big dips on highways though

f85.jpg

f86.jpg

From Tasmania

Volk GT30
20x9.5 +37
20x10.5 +35

Tyres:
Kumho KU31 ECSTA SPT
F 245/35/20
R 285/30/20

Suspension:
KW-V3 coilovers

Rubbing:
After trimming lining & rear bar mount, only on heavy dips.

f87.jpg

f88.jpg

f89.jpg

  • 6 months later...

19x9.5 +30 Front 255/35/19 (leftover from last setup, will switch to 245 or 255 40/19 when these are done)
19x10.5 +30 Rear 275/35/19

Overall, i would maybe run 5MM spacers in the front, to match the rear poke...

Alignment specs are at -0.8 front, -2.0 Rear

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz1.jpg

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz2.jpg

Decided to pull the 295 off and save them for a different build. Went with a 275 35 instead. With the added room i was able to lower it where i wanted and keep -2.5 camber.
So the specs are now 19x10 +30 275 30 front
19x11 +20 275 35 rear. When the fronts go ill probably run 275 35 19 all around.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz3.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...