Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Need for Speed 2017

There's a new Need for Speed set to be announced and revealed around 11pm tonight. 

I actually enjoyed the most recent one more than I thought I would (despite the restriction on car ownership and customization)
 

Also, in their teaser photo theres an R34. 
NFS-2017-Reveal-June-2-Tease.jpg

 

source: http://gematsu.com/2017/06/need-speed-2017-reveal-set-june-2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/470704-need-for-speed-2017/
Share on other sites

im still yet to play the last one. The trailers didnt sell me on it, but it might be worth a few hours of my time if I can pick it up for under $10

 

this one looks like the same shit-different smell with liquid Speedhunters poured all over it.

I've sworn off Need for Speed after too many time getting my hopes up only to have them completely shatter by the gameplay/physics. Did anyone ever try "The Run" probably the worst physics I've ever seen in a car game (at least a big budget game).

This video was the one that got me super excited and the game delivered none of what appeared be promised... (bear in mind 2010).

Edit:

My favourite part is at 1.31, you can hear the Koenigsegg pedalling the throttle to correct a slide (headphones up loud).

If they had made this game as good as this trailer i'd still be playing it.

Edited by Steve85

I've been trying to hunt down a copy and mods for NFS Porsche 2000. Was my favourite of the series. Most detailed cars, nice maps, handling is very average but around 2010 people were modding it. Trying to find those files now is a challenge though

  • Like 1
21 hours ago, Leroy Peterson said:

I've been trying to hunt down a copy and mods for NFS Porsche 2000. Was my favourite of the series. Most detailed cars, nice maps, handling is very average but around 2010 people were modding it. Trying to find those files now is a challenge though

ive got a copy somewhere. ill see if i can find it.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...