Jump to content
SAU Community

Light throttle jerking issues

AngryRB
 Share

Recommended Posts

AngryRB Grand Master

AngryRB

Posted
Posted
Light throttle jerking issues

Hey guys, had my RB3025 neo tuned and runs great except for on very light throttle where it starts jerking.  I've had the tuner look at the low load points and says the pwr fc is old model and most likely the problem.  I'm gonna have a road tune done also to try find out more but can anyone suggest anything else that can cause jerking.

So some stairs of setup

2530neo, 3076, 44mm tial, z32 on 4inch pipe, gfb recirc BOV set soft, pwr fc, avcr, 1000cc experts, 416 walbro, stock reg, 

One thought was I had to weld up the r33 throttle vacuum hole as it wasn't compatible with the neo mani.. not sure how important that is..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/471448-light-throttle-jerking-issues/
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Dose Pipe Sutututu Grand Master

Dose Pipe Sutututu

Posted
Posted

It's called "ACCELER." and the screen looks like this.. unfortunately it's upside down (got it off Google).

You will need a wideband and see what the AFR is like when you jab the throttle vs. RPM. Of course too rich will stumble, too lean will stumble.

Column 1 = RPM
Column 2 = how much fuel in ms
Column 3 = how long in ms

Because you're running larger injectors than stock, I would say reduce the amount in column 2 by the percentage of your injector size increase.

So OEM is 370cc right? now you have 1000cc or so.. that means you would only need 37% of the original throttle pump values.

Play around with it, however you will need a wideband.

 

images.jpg

  • Like 2
Die$eL Enthusiast

Die$eL

Posted
Posted

My MR2 turbo does this. When on light throttle it misfires. 

I replaced just about all of the vacuum pipes. It's much better now but still not 100%. I still have the replace one pipe that comes into the cabin. Hopefully that sorts it.

  • 3 months later...
AngryRB Grand Master

AngryRB

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Trex said:

Did you find a resolution to this? @AngryRB 

The tuner had it a week for cold start and cruise adjustments and has improved alot, said it was running quite rich and needed new plugs.  It seems to go jerky after a bit of a flogging and not so much when normal driven.. Ive been told its likely the power fc and the injectors being so big. Be interesting to put a haltech in but cant justify the coin.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...