Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Apologies in advance for the age old topic and question, but I'm having a very hard time finding any of the old threads and results on SAU about this and other skyline forums aren't much help either. Even google search results aren't yielding any solid information.

 

What I want to know is, how do the rb25 s1/2 HKS 256 8.8 / 264 9.0 "drop in" cams compare to Tomei 256 8.5 / 256 8.5 pon cams as far as boost response is concerned ??

I currently use the poncams and I'm wondering if I install a set of the hks or even just a hks exhaust cam, can I gain a little more mid range and peak without loosing any response...

 

The only sort of info I have been finding is people speculating about a set up they "know of" or "a mates car used these and made heaps of power"...

Obviously a before and after dyno comparison on a same car, same dyno & same day with the two different brand of cams would be ideal but I highly doubt that info is out there..

 

My set up is s1 rb25 with HKS 2835 pro S .87a/r internally gated on e85 making 470whp on 24psi

 

Any links of help is greatly appreciated lads [emoji1365]

 

IMG_8360.jpg

I was going to say....why bugger about with the brand name Jap cams when Kelford and even Camtech have excellent choices and local support?

 

 

I'm open to any and all brands if I can retain VCT and keep my current responsiveness !!!!!

Please feel free to school me (:

1 hour ago, Lithium said:

What new cam?  Got any more info than that?

I'll be running them in my new motor. Still about a month away from being available. They're a 264/272 10mm VCT combo! They should be an awesome cam if you're chasing decent numbers. First cam that I know of that is more than 9mm lift while still retaining VCT. 

Downside is it's obviously not going to be a drop in cam with 10mm lift, so head clearancing will be required. 

  • Like 1
I'll be running them in my new motor. Still about a month away from being available. They're a 264/272 10mm VCT combo! They should be an awesome cam if you're chasing decent numbers. First cam that I know of that is more than 9mm lift while still retaining VCT. 
Downside is it's obviously not going to be a drop in cam with 10mm lift, so head clearancing will be required. 



Very interested to see what you get out of those [emoji848]

These results from the RB25 dyno thread are pretty decent as far as response is concerned and that's a pretty decent top end figure too for that boost level on only 23psi & p98 fuel [emoji848]
looks very poncam-like.

I guess hub dyno results are a little stretched tho..

IMG_1443.jpgIMG_1444.jpg

Another set of old results from the RB25 dyno thread that look quite promising for poncam-like response with a decent top end for the given turbo/boost and fuel.

Starting to think I I may be able to realise my girl [emoji848]

IMG_1445.jpgIMG_1446.jpg

Another set of old results from the RB25 dyno thread that look quite promising for poncam-like response with a decent top end for the given turbo/boost and fuel.

Starting to think I I may be able to realise my girl [emoji848]

IMG_1445.thumb.jpg.12b61e2003092f6b5905f1f831d49c54.jpgIMG_1446.thumb.jpg.79e2acaf0da6b4afeb7be4786d249df6.jpg



Better pic of the dyno without the power figures cut off...

IMG_1454.jpg

This is my graph, ran 11.6 @126mph with manual, 11.2 @124mph with powerglide (did run a 126mph).

RB25DET, Tomei HG, ARP Headstuds, Gt3076r-wg, Tomei 256 drop ins, Custom 3" dump, decat, 3" cat back with muffler, 45mm Hypergate, CRG Manifold.

20170905_221032.jpg

This is my graph, ran 11.6 @126mph with manual, 11.2 @124mph with powerglide (did run a 126mph).
RB25DET, Tomei HG, ARP Headstuds, Gt3076r-wg, Tomei 256 drop ins, Custom 3" dump, decat, 3" cat back with muffler, 45mm Hypergate, CRG Manifold.
20170905_221032.thumb.jpg.dffafbd3d4176ac542d9b1e4ff631595.jpg


Thanks for the post man. I'm only really after HKS 256/264 cam results though...
I have poncams now and theres literally hundreds of poncam results around the net.

Is your turbo internal gate?

I think this obsession over the specific brand of cam is a bit odd.  Regardless of whether there was some interesting differences in the profiles between the HKS cams and the Poncams at the same ~256° duration, the fact remains that they are both 256° and there are a million other things that influence what the dyno curves and 400 times will come out looking like.  Things like how they've been dialled in, exhaust manifold, turbo choice, and a bunch of others are going to be far far more significant than the lobes on the cams.

  • Like 1
I think this obsession over the specific brand of cam is a bit odd.  Regardless of whether there was some interesting differences in the profiles between the HKS cams and the Poncams at the same ~256° duration, the fact remains that they are both 256° and there are a million other things that influence what the dyno curves and 400 times will come out looking like.  Things like how they've been dialled in, exhaust manifold, turbo choice, and a bunch of others are going to be far far more significant than the lobes on the cams.


My question has nothing to do with the brand...
When I state the brand, I'm referring to the specs of that particular brand not the brand itself my dude.
Yes Tomei make 256 and so does HKS, but once again... I'm referring to the staggered 256/264 hks cams vs Tomei 256/256 so there is a difference and will be a certain characteristic relating each of the cam types in rb25 set ups that have same/same turbos and bolt ons as seen in the graphs I've posted above. One thing that's interesting is that hks cams do seem to bring boost on earlier compared to the poncams and make slightly more peak for same boost levels but bottem to mid power seems to be much the same in a fair few of the results.
Another thing I've noticed is the hks staggered seem to do a better job with internal gate boost control but when externally gates the poncams are pretty equal.

Fair enough.  I'd actually glossed over the fact that the HKS cams were staggered.  My opinion on the matter of staggered cams with bigger exhausts on turbo engines leads towards discussion of fixing the problem that requires a staggered cam instead of the band-aid solution.  External gates &/or bigger rear housings &/or better ex manifolds being the non-band-aid solutions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...