Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Going to get the current motor through this season to stay in my class and do a swap end of year, going from CA to SR, have already started dissembling the SR for a basic forged rebuild - this is not an all out no expense spared deal but "sensible" with some niceties . Dedicate track (grip) car so not after dyno queen performance. 

The goal is to have the headroom for 300-320rwkw on e85 and whatever it makes on 98. I realise this will mean a box swap as well. Car is highport/redtop so no VCT. Expecting bore to be 86 or 86.5mm. 

Plan was to base it off the Spool rebuild kit (CP pistons, not Ross) and add ARP main studs to that kit, plus new gaskets,hoses, fresh oem water/oil pump/timing kit/balancer, basic valve spring/cam upgrade and a mild port/cleanup etc etc.

Things I'm unsure of. 

I ask here as Silvia forums is dead and asking on the Facebook groups is just painful having to deal with the morons. 


 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473785-engine-rebuild-options/
Share on other sites

Defo 9:1.  Even higher if possible, with E85.

Cams keep gentle if you're not going to replace all that weak as shit SR gear on top of the motor.

Cheapskate the ex manifold.  Put the money saved towards some head work.  A little attention in the ports will be worth more than bigger cams, better manifold, etc.

22 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Defo 9:1.  Even higher if possible, with E85.

Cams keep gentle if you're not going to replace all that weak as shit SR gear on top of the motor.

Cheapskate the ex manifold.  Put the money saved towards some head work.  A little attention in the ports will be worth more than bigger cams, better manifold, etc.

Depends on what needs replacing. It'll get stoppers, it'll get new lifters and better springs. I would've assumed the retainers were fine and the valves themselves have no impact on relaibility? Are you talking solid conversion? IF so I'll pass purely due to maintenance. 

Cams don't seem to need to be as aggressive on SRs to flow power, maybe because they have so much more lift compared to CA/RB26? 

Spool list 8.5 (stock I think?) 9.0 and 11.0:1 as options.

17 minutes ago, admS15 said:

If the plan is to run constantly on e85 9.5 or even 10:1. Will help off boost and lower rpm dramatically considering no vct and on e85 knock wont be an issue at all. Will need conservative timing and boost on 98 though.

As above Spool list 8.5 (stock I think?) 9.0 and 11.0:1 as options. 11:1 seems crazy. I'ms sure I could get something custom, but this is a mid tier build, so maybe 9:1 is the answer. 

IMO (from FWD SR experience):

dont bother with intake manifold. What do you plan to gain? plenty of people making big numbers and do fine with stock intake. Just adds extra work/complications with throttle + idle air + OEM equipment access/clearance.

mild turbo cams, or even give OEM a go and see how it handles, can always upgrade later. Put effort/money into valvetrain a bit for 300kw. springs etc.

No VCT and no VE, so would be worth port matching intake and exhaust.

GTX30 gen2 should have no issues getting to 300kw. Most people say the GTX dont really wake-up until 20+psi.

Top feed injector conversion? might be cheaper/easier to source ideal injectors that way.

Just make sure cooling/oil is up to scratch. No point in power without reliability.

Mazworks show very good gains from their intake manifold, the idea being that those supporting parts can help a smaller turbo reach the goal, like I did I my GT-R. 

Plus highport looks aids and puts all the hoses/sensors under the manifold in a shit spot. 

What do you suggest on valvetrain? As stated it will get springs and rocker arm stoppers with fresh lifters. 

When I say GTX I just mean Kinugawa variety, not sure if they are Gen2 or not, unless a second hand Gen 2 comes up. And if so, 67 or 71? 

Injector conversion is just a fuel rail isn't it? 

Radiator will be upgraded, I already have an oil cooler setup in the car with thermostat and relocator, I can just change the sandwich plate and keep using it - though I may go for a bigger core. I'm also looking at replacing factory bonnet with vented and it currently runs radiator air guide and factory clutch/fan setup which will stay as they work. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doing more reading of course and hearing some interesting things. 

  • Avoid cometic head gaskets?
  • Consider wedges between bores in the cooling slits to avoid deformation (seems extreme for a mild build)
  • Run a "modified" S15 pickup instead of S13, though mine appears the same as the one that Taarks sells as being the "updated" version. 
  • Avoid spool rods?
  • S14 girdle instead, required line bore I'd guess.

??

Yes, avoid cometic hg on SR's. Mine lasted a few years and then started to leak from combustion chamber into water jackets in a few spots and that was with arp 2000 head studs doing the clamping. I replaced it with a Nitto. Was pricey but meant to be the goods. I also hear good things about cosworth hg's and are a bit cheaper i believe.

Thoughts on parts from Goleby's?

Their timing chain kit is half the prie of OEM, includes cam gears also. 

Their lifters, Nason Engine parts? $100 for a full set versus $800 or so for OEM. 

I will go with Ross race series or OEM for balancer, but some of this other stuff, is there much in it quality wise? 

Looking at either BC or PErformance Springs, both around the same price.

Worth looking at tomei/other rocker arms? 

 

 

 

Also thoughts on Solid heads? Some parts I'm being offered includes a head. 

"tomei solid head, brand new rocker arms, tomei ras, tomei cam gears and 260 cams
supertech dual valve springs, ti retainers, valve stem seals and 1mm oversized in/ex valves and ported and polished to suit"

I like everything except the solid component as I worry about the maintance ongoing, but it's done only 2 dyno runs an is and is very cheap. 

Could swap out the cams and lifters for hydraulic? Or just learn how to check/adjust clearances on the reg? 

 

 

 

Don't bother with solid lifters... You're not going big cam and you shouldnt be revving the shit out of it.

 

If you really want that peak 300kw, then go the bigger GTX30 when IMO the latest GTX28 will be enough (or if it doesn't make 300, will be a much better suited turbo).

 

+1 to cos worth headgasket

 

+1 to BC automotive springs

 

In regards to valve train... I think usually RWD guys go for springs (sometimes retainers), Rocker arm stoppers (but is often contested by people saying it causes issues), cam gears + cams, removal of squish pads (I think) and some go valve stem seals (not sure why, get machine shop to check the head over).

 

I don't know why you're replacing rockers unless they're worn. Don't bother with Tomei/Jun/Naprec valve train stuff, seriously expensive and shouldn't be required for a mild build.

 

Also: consider what other mods the mazworx motor had when doing the plenum results.

I think PITA stuff under the plenum is unavoidable unless you're stripping the engine bay and redoing everything.

It's only that the head is complete with all that gear in it already.

Seemed like an odd combo, he's got a stroker kit there with that head, not sure on the crank brand, only that it's 92mm, billet, knife edged. Anything i could find was 91mm. Custom JE pistons, so it could be a very fun combo with a 30 frame on it. 

That whole collection of parts was very competitively priced. 

$12k on the head?? Is this the Naprec one?

Could get mazworx built VE with conversion kit for less.

 

I spent less on my whole GTiR motor and could make 300 if the gearbox/driveshafts/tyres could handle it...

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...