Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alright so my r32 with a s2 rb25det started pinging at about half to 3/4 throttle in 3rd a little bit when i turned the boost up to 9psi with a boost t. I installed a adjustable fpr and up the pressure slightly to about 40psi. The pinging stopped but at a drift day i was at yesterday i noticed it doing it under hard acceleration in second gear. The car is stock apart from the basic fmic exhaust boost t and fpr. Any ideas on what could be causing it? Timing was checked a while ago and it was correct. Only started doing it since the boost was set at 9psi

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474344-rb25det-ping-under-hard-throttle/
Share on other sites

factory base pressure for fuel is actually 43.5psi aka 3 bar so you're actually leaning out the car :)

Also if you want to fix your issue, time for an aftermarket ECU or a Nistune. Conveniently I have an Adaptronic 440D Select Plugin for sale if you wish to sort out your tune with an appropriate tuner.

This means you also can ditch your AFM, run any BOV you wish too.

20 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

factory base pressure for fuel is actually 43.5psi aka 3 bar so you're actually leaning out the car

Also if you want to fix your issue, time for an aftermarket ECU or a Nistune. Conveniently I have an Adaptronic 440D Select Plugin for sale if you wish to sort out your tune with an appropriate tuner.

This means you also can ditch your AFM, run any BOV you wish too.

Oh really? From what i read 43psi was the max you could go. Ill set it to 43.5psi and see how i go. I intend on getting a nistune but gonna pull my engine soon and freshen everything up before i get a ecu. 

Yep set it to 45psi with the hose off as stated above. Also imo you shouldn't be upping the boost on an rb25 with a stock ecu, many people do, however they run an assload of ignition timing from factory. If by any chance you are running lean then this can cause pinging very easily.

Hell i only run 10° coming onto boost ramping up to 12° on mine with an ATR45SS on 16psi. Stock R33 runs over 20° in some high load cells, I'd keep it at 7psi till you can afford to tune it

1 hour ago, Super Drager said:

Yep set it to 45psi with the hose off as stated above. Also imo you shouldn't be upping the boost on an rb25 with a stock ecu, many people do, however they run an assload of ignition timing from factory. If by any chance you are running lean then this can cause pinging very easily.

Hell i only run 10° coming onto boost ramping up to 12° on mine with an ATR45SS on 16psi. Stock R33 runs over 20° in some high load cells, I'd keep it at 7psi till you can afford to tune it

Oh i never new that. Thanks man

They might run a lot of timing at stock boost, but by the time you wind the boost up towards 10 psi the ECU starts to access the top right corner of the maps, where there is a shit ton of fuel and a massive retard of the timing.  R&R is built right into the maps.  Well, it certainly is on Neo maps, which I can see in Nistune, so I have no doubt that it was done that way on the vanilla ECU also (which I can't see in Nistune).  And even if it isn't done that way on the vanilla ECUs, it still happens.  So R&R is Nissan's self-protection mechanism to stop people from grenading stock engines.  Crude and effective.  But it can still all go wrong if the fuel pressure is not right (dud reg, or dud pump, etc) because lean will still ping, even with retarded timing.

Basically, it's not good to wind the boost up on them without having a fix for the ECU.  You can only squeeze a little more out of them before the fun police step in.  The worst thing is, you wind the boost up and it feels faster than stock.  So you wind up a bit more and eventually the placebo effect tells you that it's still going faster, but before too long any extra boost just results in massive fuel consumption and no more speed.

10 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

They might run a lot of timing at stock boost, but by the time you wind the boost up towards 10 psi the ECU starts to access the top right corner of the maps, where there is a shit ton of fuel and a massive retard of the timing.  R&R is built right into the maps.  Well, it certainly is on Neo maps, which I can see in Nistune, so I have no doubt that it was done that way on the vanilla ECU also (which I can't see in Nistune).  And even if it isn't done that way on the vanilla ECUs, it still happens.  So R&R is Nissan's self-protection mechanism to stop people from grenading stock engines.  Crude and effective.  But it can still all go wrong if the fuel pressure is not right (dud reg, or dud pump, etc) because lean will still ping, even with retarded timing.

Basically, it's not good to wind the boost up on them without having a fix for the ECU.  You can only squeeze a little more out of them before the fun police step in.  The worst thing is, you wind the boost up and it feels faster than stock.  So you wind up a bit more and eventually the placebo effect tells you that it's still going faster, but before too long any extra boost just results in massive fuel consumption and no more speed.

Yea i dont plan i winding it anymore i definitely do notice a little difference from 7-9psi though. But in saying that i dont thrash it round everywhere as it is my daily and like you said dont want to wreck my fuel economy. I get 500km out of a tank give or take 50km depending on how its driven. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...