Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, whatsisname said:

Yokohama A050, I think they're M compound.

there's your problem lol... put some normal street tyres on the back and strap the car down a bit tighter using the traction bar on the dyno, might see an instant 10~15kW or more!

As it squats and moves forward into the front roller the rear will squat down.

  • Like 1
there's your problem lol... put some normal street tyres on the back and strap the car down a bit tighter using the traction bar on the dyno, might see an instant 10~15kW or more!
As it squats and moves forward into the front roller the rear will squat down.
Cheers. Sounds like a good plan.
Might even give a hub dyno a go at some stage.
4 minutes ago, whatsisname said:

600rwkw! rhkw? emoji1787.png

I think easy, Oli's car put down 615kW on a Mainline hub dyno at Mick's Motorsports.

Also runs a GTX3584RS

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I think easy, Oli's car put down 615kW on a Mainline hub dyno at Mick's Motorsports.

Also runs a GTX3584RS

Nice! Which turbine housing, 1.01 or 1.21?     

Time to locate a local Mainline hub dyno :8_laughing:

 

4 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I think just the 1.01 rear, is that right @WantGTR?

I just realised, I've discussed that car and turbo combo' with the owner. R32 GT-R + GTX3584RS 1.01 with 784hp (585kW) at the hubs and a maiden pass of 10.8 @ 140mph at 1600+kg. It is a very impressive set of numbers.    

11 minutes ago, whatsisname said:

I just realised, I've discussed that car and turbo combo' with the owner. R32 GT-R + GTX3584RS 1.01 with 784hp (585kW) at the hubs and a maiden pass of 10.8 @ 140mph at 1600+kg. It is a very impressive set of numbers.    

It has changed again

What da f**k is going on here?
The rs is a good turbo. 
[mention=11136]Lithium[/mention] scrap your findings. Get a gtx42. Dont be a poof. Relax about dyno sheets. Lol
I concur. The RS is not RS (rat shit).

GTX4202R for the win... power and response [emoji1787]

Dyno sheets are where it's at! Lol
  • 4 months later...

I keep getting asked to update this list with old and new turbos, so I've added some ones "based off request" and also added some current or future units I have some data on.

The G30-770 I have not seen a compressor map for so just made an educated guess as to where it will sit:

image.thumb.png.76310d12850192bd8f06415334db7dce.png

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

If you're really bored, compressor inducer/exducer size would be porno

flamin mongrel.

 

But you're right, I probably should have thought of that at the start

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...