Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys!
New to this forum, Recently picked up an R32 Sedan with a swapped SR20DET Engine in it. I have some experience with the SR20 Engine but not so much on the power steering etc.

The power steering is very hard when i purchased the car, the seller liked it and didn't look into it much in the 4 months he owned the car. but I'm not a fan.

Car is running a Haltec E8 ECU, Hicas lock out bar. and i imagine standard SR20 Power steering pump.

Can anyone shed some light on this issue, and give me some guidance and how I might be able to fix it, any help is appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475313-r32-power-steering/
Share on other sites

- I suggest check the power steering pump likely is defective and ensure you have enough fluids.

- Or perhaps a short circuit occurred somewhere like the wiring loom for the oxygen sensor killing that and affecting the power steering. 

- Check HICAS fuses as it is linked to streering. 

- Check speed sensor under your dash

17 minutes ago, Robocop2310 said:

- I suggest check the power steering pump likely is defective and ensure you have enough fluids.

- Or perhaps a short circuit occurred somewhere like the wiring loom for the oxygen sensor killing that and affecting the power steering. 

- Check HICAS fuses as it is linked to streering. 

- Check speed sensor under your dash

I admire your desire to help, but there is literally no way, ever, that O2 sensor wiring will affect the steering. Never ever.

1 minute ago, Ben C34 said:

I admire your desire to help, but there is literally no way, ever, that O2 sensor wiring will affect the steering. Never ever.

All good mate but it can happen. I'm not suggesting the O2 sensor is related to the power steering but I have heard R32's wiring looms for the oxy sensor connected to the heater fail which then affected the O2 sensor and killing the power steering. It has happened.  

 

1 hour ago, Robocop2310 said:

Or perhaps a short circuit occurred somewhere like the wiring loom for the oxygen sensor killing that and affecting the power steering. 

 

1 hour ago, Ben C34 said:

I admire your desire to help, but there is literally no way, ever, that O2 sensor wiring will affect the steering. Never ever.

Actually Ben, as much as it saddens me to say it.....he's right.  Happened on my car many years ago.  Power wire for the heater on the O2 sensor is in the same loom as the PS solenoid.  When it burnt, it took out my power steer.  Was a right diagnostic f**kin' nightmare to find it too.

  • Like 1

After some research and trying to find, these doesn't appear to be a Hicas solenoid (i believe it's meant to be just below the fuse box?)

and upon checking the fuse box. the fuse i can only imagine is for Hicas( PTC Heater / 4WD ) seams to be completely missing and no pins to even plug one in.

Suggestions?

20181105_090019.jpg

20181105_090034 (1).jpg

HICAS CU lives under the parcel shelf, driver's side, near the speaker.  Have a look, see if it is there.  If it is not, then you're screwed regardless of whatever else is there or not.

The engine bay HICAS solenoids are huge things, bolted to the chassis rail opposite the (engine) oil filter location.  You can't miss them if they're there.

If someone has gone full jihad on your HICAS system and pulled everything out, you will never get the PS to the correct behaviour without finding a way to get it to do what other non-HICAS Nissans do.  There must be an (electronic) mechanism to change the PWM signal fed to the rack solenoid to affect the assistance.  I haven't looked into how to do it, because my HICAS CU still works.  I have only gone as far as thinking about what would need to be done.  I'm assuming some Arduino based rig to take in the speed signal and put out a PWM to drive the PS solenoid.  Alternative would be to find how Nissan did it elsewise to HICAS and rob the module out of a similar car (Maxima, whatever the hell else was same era).

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

HICAS CU lives under the parcel shelf, driver's side, near the speaker.  Have a look, see if it is there.  If it is not, then you're screwed regardless of whatever else is there or not.

The engine bay HICAS solenoids are huge things, bolted to the chassis rail opposite the (engine) oil filter location.  You can't miss them if they're there.

If someone has gone full jihad on your HICAS system and pulled everything out, you will never get the PS to the correct behaviour without finding a way to get it to do what other non-HICAS Nissans do.  There must be an (electronic) mechanism to change the PWM signal fed to the rack solenoid to affect the assistance.  I haven't looked into how to do it, because my HICAS CU still works.  I have only gone as far as thinking about what would need to be done.  I'm assuming some Arduino based rig to take in the speed signal and put out a PWM to drive the PS solenoid.  Alternative would be to find how Nissan did it elsewise to HICAS and rob the module out of a similar car (Maxima, whatever the hell else was same era).

Thanks for the long reply, Looks like someone gone full mad, the Computer under the parcel shelf is not there and the Solenoid set is not there under the oil filter location. I don't quite understand why it is, that i need all of this. Excuse my ignorance, but if the computer has been replaced by a haltech ECU, what telling what to do what, or rather what can't tell what to do what that making the power steering so hard?

 

Ignore the Haltech/ECU situation.  It has nothing to do with anything.

Skylines (worth importing) mostly had HICAS.  HICAS did what it was supposed to do, and because it was the steering system, it was thus entrusted with the more basic aspects of running the steering system - including deciding how much assistance to give to the rack.  This is a speed based decision, and seeing as the HICAS CU was being fed a speed signal as an input to its primary task, it probably made perfect sense to just use that one module to do everything, rather than having a separate (steering controller) module as well.

Now, it is completely possible that your car never had HICAS.  If it does have a HICAS lock bar, then it probably did have HICAS.  The rear subframes for HICAS and non-HICAS cars are different and there is no need (or possibility) of fitting a lock bar to a non-HICAS subframe.  So, if you car never had HICAS, then it would have had to have something (a steering controller module) to drive the PS solenoid.....but as I said, I've never looked into what that module would have been. Trust that it would not have been the ECU, though, because they simply don't have anything to do with the steering.

2 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Ignore the Haltech/ECU situation.  It has nothing to do with anything.

Skylines (worth importing) mostly had HICAS.  HICAS did what it was supposed to do, and because it was the steering system, it was thus entrusted with the more basic aspects of running the steering system - including deciding how much assistance to give to the rack.  This is a speed based decision, and seeing as the HICAS CU was being fed a speed signal as an input to its primary task, it probably made perfect sense to just use that one module to do everything, rather than having a separate (steering controller) module as well.

 Now, it is completely possible that your car never had HICAS.  If it does have a HICAS lock bar, then it probably did have HICAS.  The rear subframes for HICAS and non-HICAS cars are different and there is no need (or possibility) of fitting a lock bar to a non-HICAS subframe.  So, if you car never had HICAS, then it would have had to have something (a steering controller module) to drive the PS solenoid.....but as I said, I've never looked into what that module would have been. Trust that it would not have been the ECU, though, because they simply don't have anything to do with the steering.

Mmmmmk,

So my best guess is that because the computer can't get speed info, it can't tell the solenoid to have lighter power steering, thus it being stuck on hard steer mode? Am i close?

The car definitely has the lockout bar and the computer has been removed, the cable you can see dangling. So i basically just have live with the hard steering? otherwise re-fit the Solenoid/HICAS computer and go from there?

10 minutes ago, Davidbroberg said:

So my best guess is that because the computer can't get speed info, it can't tell the solenoid to have lighter power steering, thus it being stuck on hard steer mode? Am i close?

No.  If the computer that you are thinking of is the Haltech, that is NOT the computer to worry about.  The computer to worry about is not even in the car any longer (that would be the HICAS CU).  Your PS solenoid is currently (likely) receiving no volts.  Thus it gives no assistance.  Put 12V on it and it will go feather light.  Put something in between on it and it will give an in-between amount of assistance - which sort of is OK but will not feel nice all the time.

You do not want to be trying to refit the HICAS CU, just to get the PS working (despite what I said in my first post, which was assuming that the car hadn't been molested quite as heavily as it sounds like it has).  Putting the HICAS Cu back in would bring other problems that will just make your life hard.  So forget about it.  The solenoid you speak of....now, if that's the HICAS solenoid in the engine bay, don't think about it again. It is gone and you don't need it.  (As proof, I offer my car, from which I have removed all the HICAS gear EXCEPT the computer.  Having done a small wiring mod - which is nothing more than pulling one of its loom connectors off! - it is quite happy to run the power steering like it always did, without putting the red HICAS warning light up on the dash.)

Note that I have, at pretty much all times, used the terms PS solenoid and HICAS solenoid when talking about them so that there is no confusion.  The PS solenoid is just a little valve on the rack, that controls how much assistance you get.  The HICAS solenoids (of which there were actually several in the car originally) provided ALL the power that moved the rear rack (and locked it out when there was a fault, in the case of the rear solenoid).  Do not confuse them.

As I have said several posts ago, what you will want to do is work out what either non-HICAS Skylines did to arrange for variable assistance (by speed) or what other common-era Nissans did (if that proves easier) and get one of those modules and wire it in so it can see what it needs (power, speed signal being the obvious ones) and drive the PS solenoid.....OR.....make an arduino based controller that reads the speed signal and drives a PWM output (and probably SSR) to drive the PS solenoid.  The beauty of Arduino is that you can have other inputs on it (like a selector switch or variable resistor control) to vary the weight or change the shape of the assistance curve, and you can completely reprogram it if you make a mess of it the first time and don't like the result, etc etc.  but it requires enough electronics brains to not blow it up.

26 minutes ago, Davidbroberg said:

I will see if giving volts to the "PS Solenoid" Will give any results.

Why is it i want variable assistance by speed? To my knowledge my S13 never did and never needed it

Try 5 or 6 volts initially.  You will need a decent way to create that - able to handle enough current to drive the solenoid.

You want more assistance at low speed to make parking effort low, but you do not want that much assistance when going fast, because you lose all feel.

And the solenoid in your photo is indeed the PS solenoid.  It's bound to be able to pull a few amps at 12V. You could try measuring the DC resistance with a multimeter to get a rough idea how much current it will draw.

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Try 5 or 6 volts initially.  You will need a decent way to create that - able to handle enough current to drive the solenoid.

You want more assistance at low speed to make parking effort low, but you do not want that much assistance when going fast, because you lose all feel.

And the solenoid in your photo is indeed the PS solenoid.  It's bound to be able to pull a few amps at 12V. You could try measuring the DC resistance with a multimeter to get a rough idea how much current it will draw.

I think it's time to call an Auto Electrician friend, I have no idea about it.

 

Thanks for you help!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just a thought, how come you didn't use a 4D table? So you essentially run 2x fuel and 2x ignition tables, and the table/map switch is handled when there's enough WMI pressure detected. This is mine, but using the flex sensor as the 4th dimension, note the slider at the bottom. Between 0 to 70%, the timing is blended/interpolated , once it goes past 70% ethanol full send
    • Hi guys, after dreaming of owning a JDM legend for 20 years, I got the chance to buy a 1995 R33 GTR.  I live in a small country called the Solomon Islands which is in the pacific. There is no performance car scene here, however 90% of vehicles here are 2nd hand Japanese imports so there is a handful of JDM sports cars here, tucked away.  3 Evo VI’s, 1 180sx turbo, 2 GTO’s, 1 R32 GTR and 2 R33 GTR’s.    Only 1 Evo and a 33 (mine) are active. I’m hoping to set up a club to get these cars back in the road.    I’d known of my GTR for 9 years and always dreamed of owning it. At the start of this year I found it sitting outside a workshop waiting for a respray. It was in pretty bad shape, although running and driving perfectly apart from a big exhaust leak and worn out bushings. My brother in law who is a huge GTR guy came over for a holiday and I took him to see it, he got into my ear and I bought the car 2 weeks later as is.   I’ve had a pretty bad problem with alcohol and weed since 2020 and I really wanted to quit. So I used this as my motivation. I quit everything cold turkey and have been investing all my spare time into restoring this car. It’s honestly been the best experience and has been such a positive impact on my life.  There is no market for these cars here, no parts and no mechanics that can work on them, so if you wanted to sell one it would be pretty impossible unless you found the right buyer. After a bit of negotiating with the previous owner (a good friend) I got the car for $15,000 AUD ($85,000 SBD) which is insane.  I’ve almost finished doing a refresh on the engine, new turbos, spark plugs and split fire coil packs. Also new gaskets and seals, This car had no leaks to begin with, but it’s due now being 30 years old. . Next I’ll be working on the suspension, all new bushings, ball joints, king pins and new coil overs.  Then it will be body work, it has really bad rust in the boot floor, I have purchased a rear beaver cut from my bro which will replace the rusted out one. The car is originally KL0, but was burnt orange when it landed here, then it was resprayed toxic green and then Bayside Blue. I’m probably going to get it redone in Bayside Blue.  I’m super grateful to be able to enjoy this car and couldn’t have done it without my bro Chris from OG-JDM. Looking forward to the future with this car and hoping to get it on the runway at the airport here 😂  cheers fellas 
    • Also, it is just about triangularity. The less angle, the easier it physically is to do. Think of the amount of slip you're getting, as how hard you need to push an object. More slip, equals pushing way harder. Then the ramp is how steep the hill is. The Accel is less slip, which means it takes less pushing (less slip) to get it to be able to push apart. However, the steeper sides on the decell means it will take a lot more pushing (slip) to get it up the ramp.
    • It's the angle of the ramp from the vertical. You're measuring from the horizontal. To convert, take 90* minus your angle reference = Nismo Angle.
    • I agree, thus 45 degree is the *max* force one could apply to it. This is similar to what I've seen in uh... simulations... which allow you to play with diff ramp angles. Anything higher (or lower) than 45 degree would produce less force as 45 is the max... triangley.  I would state the 1 way is 90 degree, at least this is how my brain and other ways of explaining it refer to it. 90 degree also effectively acted completely open. I realise Nismo refer to it not as 90 (or 89) but "1". So I'm not understanding the angle on which these angles are based.
×
×
  • Create New...