Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all..

TL;DR - timing at idle is 3 degrees according to NDSI (Android).. unsure if safe 

I recently have been been trying to fix a rumbly idle so replaced a few things etc. I took off my CAS and compared it to a spare one I had from my DE NEO. The one from the de was a lot easier to spin with no resistance whereas the one that was in the DET was quite resistive and wouldn’t spin freely. So I ended up putting the DE cas in and centred it (which was roughly where it was) anyway I happened to look on NDSI and at idle my timing is at 3 degrees?! I was under the impression it should be at 15? 

While driving and cruising at about 100kmh the timings around 30ish but will go higher/lower depending on how my foot is.

Is this a serious issue? Obviously I’m going to get the timing etc checked but I won’t be able to do that until I get back from a 1400km road trip in the car... 

Cheers

The ECU is pulling timing to try to get the idle speed down to target.  This usually happens when you either have a vacuum leak after the throttle, or the idle valve is dirty and stuck too far open.  Both are really common, but the dirty idle valve is more common.  It requires removal, dismantling and thorough cleaning to make it work.  You should be able to see the number of "steps" that the IACV is on via Consult and if it is really low, that's your giveaway to the above.

  • Like 1
9 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The ECU is pulling timing to try to get the idle speed down to target.  This usually happens when you either have a vacuum leak after the throttle, or the idle valve is dirty and stuck too far open.  Both are really common, but the dirty idle valve is more common.  It requires removal, dismantling and thorough cleaning to make it work.  You should be able to see the number of "steps" that the IACV is on via Consult and if it is really low, that's your giveaway to the above.

So I actually already removed the IACV/AAC and thoroughly cleaned it but when I put it back on the car wouldn’t stay idling after turning on (would instantly die unless revved) and would die after revving it but if I held rpm at around 1k it would idle. So I upped the idle to about 900rpm on the iac screw, I did have the tps plugged in though which I read after it should’ve been unplugged. 

Should i I watch the “steps” when at idle? What’s a number it’s say, fine at? 

I guess what concerns me more is that if the timing being that low when at idle etc is it doing harm with me driving? 

Thanks

Well, seeing as you're still worried about the "while you're driving bit", you should NOT take the ECU's word for what the ignition timing is.  The ECU only knows what the CAS tells it about engine position.  You have taken the CAS off and put another back on, so the real engine position could be different to what it (the CAS) thinks it is.  The only way to know for sure is to put a timing light on the engine and see.  If the marks don't agree with the ECU, then it is time for investigation.  This can simply mean you have to adjust the CAS to make them agree, but it can also indicate a mechanical problem (the pulley can slip on the balancer's rubber).

You should not just wind up the idle on the screw on a Neo (or on many engines) because the ECU is actively trying to control the idle down to the setpoint in the ECU, which is about 650 rpm.  You have opened up a bigger air flow path that the ECU can't control, so it winds the IACV down to nothing, then it starts pulling timing.  I think the IACV steps can be almost any number, if it's actually working, depending on how far open it needs to be to support the load at idle.  But if you see it at low values, like 30 and it's not moving up and down to maintain the idle, then it is probably bottomed out.

You probably haven't done a good job on cleaning the IACV and/or putting it back together. Probably worth another shot.

And lastly, all of this is only for idle.  Unless you have a real mechanical problem causing the low idle timing, then the idle timing maps and control do not play any part when the engine is running on the main maps.  You should monitor the timing while driving.  Run the car at moderate load (up a mild hill) and hold it at a known engine speed (say 3000 rpm).  Note the timing value.  If you can check the TP value on your Consult, then you can look up the standard Neo timing maps for that load and speed and see if it matches what the ECU was commanding.

Sounds like the reading is actually the Timming added by the ecu. Wich would suggest to much manual advance on the cas.
I believe the ecu normaly adds 10 -15 at idle so it stays at about 30 on idle.... according to my rb25 experiences.

A slight rough idle can happen from an exhaust leak prior exhaust o2 sensor.
The standard ecu on an rb always hunts for the best spot. The more air tight and fresh your plant the less noticeable the hunting.

I would try retarding the car 5-12

11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Well, seeing as you're still worried about the "while you're driving bit", you should NOT take the ECU's word for what the ignition timing is.  The ECU only knows what the CAS tells it about engine position.  You have taken the CAS off and put another back on, so the real engine position could be different to what it (the CAS) thinks it is.  The only way to know for sure is to put a timing light on the engine and see.  If the marks don't agree with the ECU, then it is time for investigation.  This can simply mean you have to adjust the CAS to make them agree, but it can also indicate a mechanical problem (the pulley can slip on the balancer's rubber).

You should not just wind up the idle on the screw on a Neo (or on many engines) because the ECU is actively trying to control the idle down to the setpoint in the ECU, which is about 650 rpm.  You have opened up a bigger air flow path that the ECU can't control, so it winds the IACV down to nothing, then it starts pulling timing.  I think the IACV steps can be almost any number, if it's actually working, depending on how far open it needs to be to support the load at idle.  But if you see it at low values, like 30 and it's not moving up and down to maintain the idle, then it is probably bottomed out.

You probably haven't done a good job on cleaning the IACV and/or putting it back together. Probably worth another shot.

And lastly, all of this is only for idle.  Unless you have a real mechanical problem causing the low idle timing, then the idle timing maps and control do not play any part when the engine is running on the main maps.  You should monitor the timing while driving.  Run the car at moderate load (up a mild hill) and hold it at a known engine speed (say 3000 rpm).  Note the timing value.  If you can check the TP value on your Consult, then you can look up the standard Neo timing maps for that load and speed and see if it matches what the ECU was commanding.

Right cheers, I’ll get the timing checked and confirm that base timing is correct then I guess adjust cas from there. 

I’d say you’re correct about the iac being bottomed out, at idle it sits at about 30-31 and doesn’t move. 

I’ll adjust it back to what it was.. should I be removing the tps connector when I wind it back? 

The highest the timing went was about 50, on a whole hour drive,

i went up a moderate hill going 100kmh at 2500rpm and the timing was about 30-40 depending on the accelerator, I found the high 50 timing was say when I was in 3rd gear moving along at a constant rpm probably on a slight hill.

7 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

If you have guessed the position of the CAS guess again and advance it a little and see what happens.

Hmm it was marked on the old cas so I tried to get it as close to that as possible.. I’ll see if I can compare it again and check.

5 hours ago, Slap said:

Sounds like the reading is actually the Timming added by the ecu. Wich would suggest to much manual advance on the cas.
I believe the ecu normaly adds 10 -15 at idle so it stays at about 30 on idle.... according to my rb25 experiences.

A slight rough idle can happen from an exhaust leak prior exhaust o2 sensor.
The standard ecu on an rb always hunts for the best spot. The more air tight and fresh your plant the less noticeable the hunting.

I would try retarding the car 5-12

It’s not really a slight rough idle.. it’s pretty aggressive. The rpm doesn’t hunt, stays the same but the car will be shaking all over the place, some days worse than others and only noticeable when the engines warm form what I can tell

8 hours ago, Slap said:

Sounds like the reading is actually the Timming added by the ecu. Wich would suggest to much manual advance on the cas.
I believe the ecu normaly adds 10 -15 at idle so it stays at about 30 on idle.... according to my rb25 experiences.

I would try retarding the car 5-12

Sorry, no.  All wrong.

Idle timing is a real 15° (manual), or 20°(auto).  30° at idle would be a shitshow.

9 hours ago, Slap said:

I believe the ecu normaly adds 10 -15 at idle so it stays at about 30 on idle.... according to my rb25 experiences.

Wtf? No man.

Your experiences must have been with incorrectly timed motor ie incorrectly installed cam timing belt.

It's 30 with ignition added form the ecu I'm certain. So as a total.
I'll scratch around but I'm sure.
Everything I can remember about the stock ecu and it's hunting for perfection is a bit vague.
Base case trimming 15-17
Ecu adds about 10 -13
Depending on fuel used as the ignition will add as much advance as it can at idle going back and forth adding and subtracting timming and fuel in accordance to air fuel ratios and knock voltage.

Maybe I'm wrong ... time to dig.

  • Confused 1

No, the absolute static idle timing is 15°.  The ECU's knowledge of the engine's position is based on the assumption that the CAS is adjusted so that its TDC point is the same as the crank's.  That, of course, puts the ECU at the mercy of the idiot twiddling that CAS position.  But when everything is set correctly, the ECU says that the idle timing is 15° because that's what it is.

No I believe you are wrong in a way.

Im sure that is the timming added by the ecu.
Pull the light out and compare what the ecu says to the light.

The ecu assumes that it is at 15. But doesn't hesitate to change it if it can change it whilst staying within parrameter of the knock and the air fuel ratios. If it's still on one side of the parrameter it will continue that way until it has passed it and then head back trying to narrow in on it's best idle that it can provide.

People use cam gears all the time with stock ecu. That will change cas. The impacts of the car changing can be within reason ironed out by the ecu while it isn't using load maps. But the load maps won't be altered and that's where people adjust the cas to correct load maps and let the ecu fix low load and idle.

It is not hard to check if that is all that is wrong.

Retard the cas a bit and check. If you over advance and drive it is way worse if than retard.

You prove it to me and I will believe you gtsboy show me a document or something.

Even if I'm wrong how hard is it to check!

You are so wrong,

ECU strategies may add a bit of timing when the motor is cold and or for idle control but the base idle timing without any form of ignition compensation is 15 degrees on a stock ECU.

Also good luck trying to control idle with 30 degrees of timing.

  • Like 1

Whoever is reading this thread, please ignore what @Slap is saying.

Nothing worse than cracking some ring lands or destroying your motor due to knock.

Do not advance your motor by 15 degrees on top of the base timing. You'll end up poorer and in tears.

  • Like 2
Whoever is reading this thread, please ignore what [mention=150098]Slap[/mention] is saying.
Nothing worse than cracking some ring lands or destroying your motor due to knock.
Do not advance your motor by 15 degrees on top of the base timing. You'll end up poorer and in tears.
I never said that . Get some glasses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...