Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Back again . My DR30 has an open 3.9 ratio R200 . I thought all these cars came with an LSD center . The Bluebird had an R200 3.9 ratio LSD that had the internal spacers flicked and a full set of plates fitted , I think 3 sets of active plates per side insted of 1 . The pre-load was about 67 ft lbs and too much for a road car .

My point is I want to try a 3.7 ratio diff to give the engine more to load up against .

I've noticed that when loaded down with lots of weigh ie extra diffs/drive shafts/struts/A arms/X members (basically another car in the boot) the engine basically says bring it on , more more more . Has anyone used the 3.7 ratio and what did it come out of , swapping in the lsd is no issue .

Also nearly forgot DR30 R200's can use a very expensive replacable uni joint found only in the middle of some Navara 2 piece tailshafts . I believe there is a pinion flange that is larger off I think a Z31 or a 280ZX that uses a larger replacable and cheaper uni joint . Anyone out there know for sure ?

Thanks for your thoughts A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47835-r200-ratios-and-the-dr30rs/
Share on other sites

My car has too many std intercooled turbo bits I reckon to be retro . It is white under the bonnet and two pak silver elswhere ie no lairy decals behind the doors or black lower down .

Its more likely that it was changed in Japan after being abused or it was too good to sell with the car . As I understand it R200 LSD's are not cheap but can be fitted into later cars (the center hemisphere) . In the early 80's Nissan changed the crown wheel bolts from 10 to 12mm , early centers can be drilled out to 12mm or late ones can have 1mm thick bushes fitted to 1 or 2 bolts just to torque it up .

Anyhow I want a 3.7 open diff to put my LSD in to give the engine more load to work against . I hate the 1-2 ratio spread in the Nissan gearboxes (too wide) and there is no easy way around this . Some RB25DET gearboxes are slightly better but are very expensive to buy and substantially heavier . I'll have to look into Z31/32 NA gearboxes as I vaguely remember one of them having a 3:1 1st gear .

Gotta go cheers A .

R200 diffs also came in S12, S13, S14, S15 - R30, R31, R32, R33. If you investigate all the types of R200's, you should find the ideal one for your application. Being a DR30, the smaller R200's such as S13 etc will probably be your best option as the R33/Z32 diff centres are the larger type.

Not quite sure what you mean by larger type . I know S13-15 and Z32 , R32/33 use a slightly different variant (shorter snout and pinion shaft plus different mounting system) I think the basic hemisphere dimensions are the same ie carrier bearing journals and the register that locates in the crown wheel .

When I mentioned Z31/32 I was refering to gearbox ratios .

Boof yes . When I had the Bluebird (L20B bored and stroked to 2340cc pre FJT) Stewart Wilkins built me a gearbox using Aust spec 260Z mainshaft and lay gear , also converted to warner syncros . 1st was 2.906:1 and the rest the same as FJ20 . 1st was a touch tall but once rolling it was brilliant . I still have this box but unfortunately the gears are all narrow as in all early Nissan 6 cyl 71 series boxes . I reckon the FJ would kill it in short order .

It would appear that some have an incorrect understanding of gear ratios. So FYI here's how it works:

for example, old mate has a 3:1 first gear a 2.5:1 2nd, a 2:1 3rd, and a 3.9:1 diff ratio.

He feels that 1st gear is "too low" (ie car hauls a55 in 1st but bogs down when it hits 2nd)

He could change the diff ratio to a higher 4.11, (higher number= lower ratio), this would give the impression of the gears being closer together, but at the same time rather than fixing the problem he is just masking it. with the downfall being less overall top end.(more torque would fix it properly though, as Adam_RSX said.)

The solution is to lower the ratio of 1st gear,(raise the number) to maybe 2.8:1

He is raising 1st by lowering the ratio, bringing 1st closer to 2nd.

Higher the number, lower the ratio.......

PS if you all already knew this then maybe i just got confused along the thread...

:)

Jason

I think Disco wants to go higher ratio diff (3.7:1) as well as tinker with the box ratios....

Yeah, i know....i was just clearing it up for someone who appeared to not get it properly....

also, i dunno bout r30's onwards but the older dattos that had auto trannys were all 3.7 ratio diff......try looking in an auto r30/32/33/34 maybe?

  • 2 weeks later...
Boof yes . When I had the Bluebird (L20B bored and stroked to 2340cc pre FJT) Stewart Wilkins built me a gearbox using Aust spec 260Z mainshaft and lay gear , also converted to warner syncros . 1st was 2.906:1 and the rest the same as FJ20 . 1st was a touch tall but once rolling it was brilliant . I still have this box but unfortunately the gears are all narrow as in all early Nissan 6 cyl 71 series boxes . I reckon the FJ would kill it in short order .

The answer to your diff question is 260Z, they came out standard with a long nose R200 open 3.7:1 ratio.

The gearbox might be a little different, but my sources tell me the Zed rally guys are now using R31 gearboxes behind their L series engines, just have to change and modify the bell housing.

I have an RB20DET box that I am going to set up to suit the L Series if I go that way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...