Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

everyone Tuning and upgrading a Neo engine will run into this problem sooner or later.

The Boost sensor on the neo cuts fuel if sees lots of boost around 14 PSI.

Now as some people say the sensor is not only a failsafe, rather then also helping under vacuum setting fueling.

so to get around that Problem I will try to install a checkvalve infront of it. So under boost no pressure will arrive the sensor but it can see vacuum.

 

Has anyone tried that before?

 

I am Running 

FMIC

new Coilpacks

 A Gt3071r turbo

custom exhaust 

oilcooler and Catchcan setup

 

to install now is R35 injectors and R35 AFM

will then be tuned with nistune.

 

Off Topic:

At 250 km/h on the Autobahn B—Pillar Driverside left the Game and is not seen jet.

Does anyone know where to get one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/480844-boost-sensor-mapsensor-neo-engine/
Share on other sites

Easiest place to get one would be beside the autobahn probably....the front inner guard liners are also poorly attached for high speed so watch out for a massive noise followed by no braking on one side after the guard liner slides under the whell....

Re the ECU Boost cut, even before you hit that you will be in parts of the stock may with retarded timing and rich AFRs, designed by the factory to protect when you are outside "normal" parameters as you are at 14psi

Just do the Nistune first and fix those areas of the map, someone else can confirm but I expect it can remove the boost cut too. No need to add a checkvalve.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Boost sensor can be dealt with in Nistune.

Max out the boost cut to 255, however leave it connected, as soon as you disconnect it Nistune goes crazy and always references the last column on boost.

Initial Nistune documentation said it could be disconnected and disabled however subsequent guides recommend it be connected, hooked up however disabled in the software. If not it will be an absolute pig to drive, it keeps referencing the last column on transient throttle.

According to the Nistune Neo tuning guide you can increase boost to 18 psi by increasing the  boost sensor fuel cut table to a maximum of 5100 millivolts. Is it possible to change the factory sensor for a 3 bar map sensor and then tune  to increase boost to 30 psi?

I think the best way to deal with the boost sensor's inherent upper limit would be to treat it like a wastegate and put a bleed valve on it. You put a restriction between the plenum source and the sensor, and bleed some boost out of the sense line between that restriction and the sensor. Just like a wastegate, the sensor will see a lower boost than the engine does. If you need to run 25 psi, you just bleed that down to <18 psi and it will still do what it is supposed to do.

Can’t see a bleedvalve work in that area, pressure will rise or a boostleak will be build in your application. 

 

@Duncan as soon as i saw prices on those parts i should have looked for it no matter what

Yes, even running a piggy and altering AFM Volts to reach sufficiant fueling , the car retards timing down to 3 degrees at 5 psi. Reason being i have to show him more Airflow in areas of the map where it shouldnt , to keep AFR around 12.

@NZ-GTT -i think all sensors work the same it lol give different output, based on how much the ECU works with the input it might might not work.

 

All in All, u cant get away with a piggy, after modding intake to turbo to exhaust hoping it lol run fine.

Boost sensors have a linear output of 0-5V relative to whatever the input pressure range of the sensor is. So if the factory sensor that appears to be a 2 bar map sensor was changed out to a 3 bar, the output voltage to the ecu remains at 0-5V but with a larger pressure range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...