Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have tried searching for a new set of press in bushings for the front transverse link because they have tears in them. I cant seem to find any bushings for the r34 gtr and now i am wondering if I need to buy the whole link/arm on both sides? Are these bushings not ment to be pressed in and out or something?

On 8/6/2022 at 6:13 AM, The Skyline Guy said:

I have tried searching for a new set of press in bushings for the front transverse link because they have tears in them. I cant seem to find any bushings for the r34 gtr and now i am wondering if I need to buy the whole link/arm on both sides? Are these bushings not ment to be pressed in and out or something?

You may be able to get the bushing for them if you're willing to do a lot of digging and experimentation. As far as I can tell they look an awful lot like the R33/R32 GTR tension rod bushings. The trouble is Nismo does not cross-list compatibility for those bushings with the R34 GTR. To me this implies that they are in fact a different spec. If you are willing to convert to R33 GTR/R34 N1 spec lower control arm + tension rods then the bushing is 54476-RS580 if you want the Nismo part, 54476-05U00 if you want Nissan OEM. Unlike the street-spec R34 aluminum control arm these are steel and increase unsprung weight but they are adjustable. Nismo sells this conversion still if you want the silver paint and Nismo logo under part number 54460-RRR45. If you look at the Nissan parts diagram they mention explicitly that the "components are not for sale" so this will be an uphill battle. The easiest way if you can just parts cannon your way out of this is to buy the now Nismo Heritage part number for the whole control arm, LH is 54501-RHR40, RH is 54500-RHR40.

On 8/6/2022 at 3:03 PM, Duncan said:

Got a pic or diagram of the bush you are after?

https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/bnr34/3957-rb26dett/trans/401/54501/

image.thumb.png.665d981057bce2bc364cddda0ac2b5ca.png

But. But. But..... No-one puts standard bushings in the (I assume you mean the) radius rod. Urethane at the minimum, otherwise bin the stock arm and put something with spherical joints in there. The stock rubber bushings are horrible. All squishy and allow ridiculous amounts of fore-aft movement in the lower arm.

On 8/6/2022 at 11:07 PM, GTSBoy said:

But. But. But..... No-one puts standard bushings in the (I assume you mean the) radius rod. Urethane at the minimum, otherwise bin the stock arm and put something with spherical joints in there. The stock rubber bushings are horrible. All squishy and allow ridiculous amounts of fore-aft movement in the lower arm.

Only reason why I'm skeptical of poly bushings is because they can make a lot of noise, for now I'm just running the Nismo rubber bushings. I'm still unclear on why the various poly bushing vendors out there crosslist the R34 and R33/R32 GTR radius rod bushing when Nissan does not.

On 8/8/2022 at 5:53 AM, joshuaho96 said:

Only reason why I'm skeptical of poly bushings is because they can make a lot of noise, for now I'm just running the Nismo rubber bushings. I'm still unclear on why the various poly bushing vendors out there crosslist the R34 and R33/R32 GTR radius rod bushing when Nissan does not.

You're talking about a joint that hardly has any rotational motion at all (in degrees) but takes a simply massive longitudinal load. Hydrolastic OEM bushes can go die in a fire in that application.

I had urethane bushes in my front radius rods for 10 years and they never made a noise. They don't even require lube to not make a noise, as they don't move (rotationally) more than the urethane will take internally anyway. But I abandoned even urethane for the simple joys of sphericals. And please do not bitch about NVH. For the same reasons that urethane is not a problem (not that it's a problem anywhere, anyway), the radius rod bushes are the single least likely place for you to notice any extra NVH from sphericals, yet they are the single best place to have them to improve the feel of the front end.

As to urethane bushing manufacturers/vendors cross listing radius rod bushes between 33 and 34 GTRs..... perhaps the most trusted such manufacturer, Whiteline, does not. They only list the bushes for the 32&33, not the 34. A la Nissan. However, as nearly everything else in the 33/34 chassis is interchangeable, I'd be surprised that the physical dimensions of the bush are different. It would surely just be that Nissan had a change of spec of the squishy juice they kept inside them, rather than anything truly incompatible. Or....maybe there was a difference in the lower control arms that I'm not aware of....that actually rings a bell. Did they not go to alloy, or something? But the upshot is, bushes are typically only ~$200, so don't cost/lose much if you (or, the OP in this case) buy, try and fail. But I wouldn't even bother. Just go straight to sphericals.

And, for further corroboration, or confusion if you want to take it that way, several trusted manufacturers of radius rods do not cross list the 33 and 34 GTR either.

On 8/7/2022 at 4:05 PM, GTSBoy said:

You're talking about a joint that hardly has any rotational motion at all (in degrees) but takes a simply massive longitudinal load. Hydrolastic OEM bushes can go die in a fire in that application.

I had urethane bushes in my front radius rods for 10 years and they never made a noise. They don't even require lube to not make a noise, as they don't move (rotationally) more than the urethane will take internally anyway. But I abandoned even urethane for the simple joys of sphericals. And please do not bitch about NVH. For the same reasons that urethane is not a problem (not that it's a problem anywhere, anyway), the radius rod bushes are the single least likely place for you to notice any extra NVH from sphericals, yet they are the single best place to have them to improve the feel of the front end.

As to urethane bushing manufacturers/vendors cross listing radius rod bushes between 33 and 34 GTRs..... perhaps the most trusted such manufacturer, Whiteline, does not. They only list the bushes for the 32&33, not the 34. A la Nissan. However, as nearly everything else in the 33/34 chassis is interchangeable, I'd be surprised that the physical dimensions of the bush are different. It would surely just be that Nissan had a change of spec of the squishy juice they kept inside them, rather than anything truly incompatible. Or....maybe there was a difference in the lower control arms that I'm not aware of....that actually rings a bell. Did they not go to alloy, or something? But the upshot is, bushes are typically only ~$200, so don't cost/lose much if you (or, the OP in this case) buy, try and fail. But I wouldn't even bother. Just go straight to sphericals.

And, for further corroboration, or confusion if you want to take it that way, several trusted manufacturers of radius rods do not cross list the 33 and 34 GTR either.

The R34 GTR in specific (all but N1 spec) had a special lower aluminum lower control arm that combined the "transverse link" with the radius rod into a single non-adjustable piece. You can see it in the linked parts diagram, they have the N1 part which has the same design as the R33 with the separate transverse link and a radius rod that bolts into that and the normal R34 GTR part. As mentioned earlier Nismo actually sells this conversion with a bit of extra welding and a coat of silver paint for big money. So I am skeptical that sites listing the same bushing for both generations without qualification.

If I ever do need to replace a bushing I'll probably do more research but that's probably immaterial to what OP is asking about.

34 GTR has a stupid idea with the one piece lower control arm and caster rods. These can just be changed out to R33/R32 GTR separate caster and lower control arms apparently. @GTRNUR on here did this

On 8/7/2022 at 7:04 PM, BK said:

34 GTR has a stupid idea with the one piece lower control arm and caster rods. These can just be changed out to R33/R32 GTR separate caster and lower control arms apparently. @GTRNUR on here did this

I suspect the R32 GTR is not a perfect interchange, R33 should be though. A surprising number of suspension revisions occurred between the R32 and R33. It vaguely looks like the same general design but almost all of the actual parts are different numbers and the upper control arm especially has been noticeably redesigned.

Mate, I have r32 and R33 GTRs, - the front lower control arms and caster rods are identical. The old man actually pinched one of my spare 33 ones and has it on the white 32. Nissan isn't very good at always superceding part numbers for new ones in fast and just change the number a lot. Ikeya formula actually sell an adjustable 2 piece lower control arm and caster rod set that bolts into 32/33/34, which is what @GTRNUR was trying to avoid buying because of the price of them. This would be the easiest solution on a stock 34R.

https://www.rhdjapan.com/ikeya-formula-roll-center-adjuster-lower-arm-kit-pillow-ball-type-bnr32-bcnr33-bnr34.html

The big difference in 32 to 33/34 is the front upper control arm design.

The rear arms between 32 GTR and 33/34 have a slight difference in offest though, even though they physically fit.

Given Ben's input above, it would seem that the crush tube length would be the same between R33 and R34 GTRs. Given the crush tube is the same length, then the length of the outer is v.likely the same also. And so the only unknown would be the ID of the outer tube. This leaves a better than 50/50 chance that the R33 bush would go into the R34 radius rod.

On 8/7/2022 at 7:50 PM, BK said:

Mate, I have r32 and R33 GTRs, - the front lower control arms and caster rods are identical. The old man actually pinched one of my spare 33 ones and has it on the white 32. Nissan isn't very good at always superceding part numbers for new ones in fast and just change the number a lot.

The big difference in 32 to 33/34 is the front upper control arm design.

The rear arms between 32 GTR and 33/34 have a slight difference though.

Good to know, they looked identical but I'm always reluctant to say whether they are truly identical if the part numbers don't line up. 

  • 1 month later...

I've been through this a year or two : bushing of front lower arm is different between R33 and R34. Outer Diameter of the bushing is not the same (the R34 is larger). And there is no replacement part for the R34 bushing : you have to change the complete arm (what a bad idea).

Or you can put the R33/Nismo lower arm: the cheapest and best option as you will be able to have adjustable front arms and you can change the bushing latter if needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...