Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey peeps, wah gwan!! I am a Jamaican living in New York, and I recently acquired my 96 ECR33 GTS-T. I am really excited about driving this car and really getting to know it inside out.

Here I have added a few pics of the car.

 

20221219_125221.jpg

20221219_130001.jpg

20221219_125926.jpg

20221214_183556.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484318-finally-have-one-of-my-own/
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, admS15 said:

Welcome, yep they're the holy grail of R33 headlights. Anything else done to the car? We can see the gtr style bar, fmic, carbon bonnet and said headlights. Future plans?

It came with:

MINE'S ECU

Le Mans Sr3 Recaros (1 has small rip)

R33 GT-R Brembos (front & rear)

NISMO adjustable struts 

FGK stainless cat back

The current wheels are VOLK (not sure of the styling or name)

CUSCO braces in front (on struts) and rear (trunk)

Future plans:

Greddy sidefeed intake  (have it already)

WORK EMOTION KAI 18" (already have)

Turbo manifold

Coilovers (brand to be determined)

ECU to be determined ( I have a Haltech Elite 1500 and a Fueltech 550 in hand)

Just a food not, the car is AUTO, and I believe I have EVERYTHING to do the swap, even the MT tranny harness.

But I'm a sponge and am opened to suggestions of what not to do, and what has to be done.

 

 

20221219_133451.jpg

20221219_114517.jpg

20221219_114016.jpg

20221213_094946.jpg

20221213_093856.jpg

Nice list, manual swap is definitely a good idea. I have a set of those exact wheels myself, they are Rays Volk f-zero winning from around the mid 1990's.

As far as what not to do, that depends on the end goal. If wanting more power than 350rwkw (475hp) then a built forged engine is required.

With the ecu choice, if you where in Aus the haltech would be it as they have so much support here and the fuel tech not so much. In the US I'd assume the ft is well supported so it probably comes down to which ecu has the most features and fits with your plans for the car.

 

Probably best to change that ECU early unless you are certain the mines ECU is safe. I don't know how available high octane fuel is where you are, but the Mines ECU generally expect 100RON and won't have much margin for safety

29 minutes ago, admS15 said:

Nice list, manual swap is definitely a good idea. I have a set of those exact wheels myself, they are Rays Volk f-zero winning from around the mid 1990's.

As far as what not to do, that depends on the end goal. If wanting more power than 350rwkw (475hp) then a built forged engine is required.

With the ecu choice, if you where in Aus the haltech would be it as they have so much support here and the fuel tech not so much. In the US I'd assume the ft is well supported so it probably comes down to which ecu has the most features and fits with your plans for the car.

 

The wheels are nice, and will keep them just incase.

375 - 400whp would be my max, if at all. Not looking for a fast car, just something both me and the wife will enjoy driving on the weekends. 

Well for now, the ECU choice will depend on any further upgrades, support (as you stated), and the turner's ability to produce just enough power to make it a fun ride.

3 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Probably best to change that ECU early unless you are certain the mines ECU is safe. I don't know how available high octane fuel is where you are, but the Mines ECU generally expect 100RON and won't have much margin for safety

That's the plan.

Will do all the little things (oil change, check belts, etc) before its 1st official drive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...