Jump to content
SAU Community

Can i run a FFP on a stock RB25DET Neo motor?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys so ive been running rough recently when i just got my car out the shop with the new RB25DET Neo motor in it and have found out that it could be because i was using a DE ECU instead of a DET one so im hoping to find out if i can still have a front facing plenum on the engine with a factory DET ecu or will that require an aftermarket ecu that needs to be tuned to suit? 

 

Any advice would be great! Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, zJosho said:

it could be because i was using a DE ECU instead of a DET one

Yeah, no surprise there. The chances of getting the fuelling right with a DE ECU trying to run turbo injectors with boost are slim to none. The chances of the timing advance being right (ie, not way the hell too much) are even lower. You will be lucky not to have damaged the engine if you have managed to put it under any serious load.

12 minutes ago, zJosho said:

can still have a front facing plenum on the engine with a factory DET ecu

Yes, but.....

12 minutes ago, zJosho said:

will that require an aftermarket ecu that needs to be tuned to suit?

You really shouldn't try to run the factory ECU without any mods to it at all - even if you didn't have an FFP. By this I mean that the only sensible way to run a standard ECU is with a Nistune put into it, so you can tune it, to get the best out of it. And if you have something unnecessary, like an FFP, then it would be almost mandatory to be able to tune it, because the FFP will definitely interfere with the air distribution (compared to the stock plenum) and you'd want to be able to deal with that.

But, most importantly, if you do want to use a factory ECU, then you're going to need to use the factory throttlebody, because the factory ECU won't be happy with anything else. And this brings in another problem. Unless the ECU and TB are from a Stagea, then there is a bloody great big traction control auxiliary throttle in the TB. This does not fit well in front of an FFP, and you can't easily hack it off. Well, you can hack it off, but then you also need to go down the path of dealing with the DTC codes in the ECU (only possible with Nistune, by the way) and so on and so forth. Not impossible, but stuff that must be dealt with.

If you must have an FFP, life will be easier with a Haltech and a modern e-throttle, so you can abandon the IACV and keep everything compact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you like no low/mid range torque go for it
Biggest waste of money and performance especially all the fake/copy stuff.

This is the only aftermarket plenum to run
https://plazmaman.com/product/rb25-det-r33-skyline-inlet-plenum/

Add DBW and an aftermarket ecu makes it great for drivability and torque everywhere. Can control air velocity by open/close TB at certain rpm/load 

*** I previously ran a genuine greddy & q45 TB best thing I did was go plazmaman plenum & DBW***

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn’t there just a Motive video where it demonstrated that shorter runners means a higher turbo threshold? I would not make any change that reduces the length of the intake runners. Personally I’m curious to know how the Plazmaman upper plenum intake compares with the Rajab take on the design which reduces plenum volume but increases runner length. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...