Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Yuh....but weren't all the supertourers, except maybe the Audis, FWD? I don't recall any of the others being AWD.

They were. I bought the AWD for experimenting but racing it would disqualify or disadvantage me from a few race classes. Def getting a FWD for racing.

6 hours ago, Duncan said:

They ran them in Oz Super Tourers too

https://www.supertouringregister.com/register/vehicle/212/

(I'm so old I remember racing with Matthew Fox)

They ran them in Oz Super Tourers too

https://www.supertouringregister.com/register/vehicle/212/

(I'm so old I remember racing with Matthew Fox)

You know you're really old when the dementia kicks in over text...

  • Haha 1
7 hours ago, Duncan said:

They ran them in Oz Super Tourers too

https://www.supertouringregister.com/register/vehicle/212/

(I'm so old I remember racing with Matthew Fox)

Says on the site that the car was sold to Keith Linnell. His shop is about 15 mins from my place. My try to see if he still has it!

1 minute ago, Duncan said:

Yeah the aussie one was super unsuccessful. It is almost certainly at the back of some workshop under a very dusty cover :)

I’ll offer him $50 and a cold beer and see if he wants to sell. Will save me building one

31 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Yeah the aussie one was super unsuccessful. It is almost certainly at the back of some workshop under a very dusty cover :)

Just re-read the history of that car. That was the P10 which wasn’t that successful. It was effectively just a Pulsar SSS with IRS. The P11 was a much better and more successful beast. I’m surprise for a campaign in the 2000’s they bought such an old car.

11 hours ago, funkymonkey said:

Just re-read the history of that car. That was the P10 which wasn’t that successful. It was effectively just a Pulsar SSS with IRS. The P11 was a much better and more successful beast. I’m surprise for a campaign in the 2000’s they bought such an old car.

Just a budget thing I'm sure.

Super tourers didn't make it locally and the drivers in that car were paying for drives; so the business case doesn't stack up unless the base car is cheap

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...