Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently did a clutch install and noticed a leak that seems to be coming from the rear of that transmission where the actuator is. 

I can tell it's not my transmission fluid because I used the redline shockproof and that was a thicker, more pinkish color. I filled the transfer case with ATF and that is bright red. That seems to be the fluid I am leaking. 

My question is, would I be able to use RTV to help make the seal on the actuator? I know these actuators have a built in lip that act as a gasket/oring and considering the cars 30+ and I had to remove it on and off a few times it might be due for a new one (hopefully it's not).

Prior to the clutch job, there was no leaks from. 

I'm waiting for some replacement hoses to change out the lines for the ATTESSA canister in the trunk leading to the actuator and address another leak that I've had from there for a little bit. 

Appreciate your advice and thanks in advance guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484766-r32-gtr-actuator-leak/
Share on other sites

Yeah the line into the back of the transfer case is for the ATTESSA actuation, it is fed from the reservoir in the boot. It is unlikely to be coming from the transfer case itself (same fluid but separate areas) and won't be gearbox fluid back there.

There are 2 common leak points:

1. Where the actuator connects to the transfer case, it is a flange with 2 bolts (from memory) and a gasket. This could leak, if so remove the actuator, replace the gasket, tighten to spec and it should be fine.

2. More common the threaded fitting and angled seat is leaking. Sounds like you have been undoing the line there so that is most likely the issue, I'd remove it again, clean both the threads and actuator with brake clean then retighten. No point adding thread tape / teflon sealer there as the sealing is in the flange not the thread.

90% I'd guess it is #2, and an easy fix. You might have to bleed the ATTESSA afterwards.

59 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Yeah the line into the back of the transfer case is for the ATTESSA actuation, it is fed from the reservoir in the boot. It is unlikely to be coming from the transfer case itself (same fluid but separate areas) and won't be gearbox fluid back there.

There are 2 common leak points:

1. Where the actuator connects to the transfer case, it is a flange with 2 bolts (from memory) and a gasket. This could leak, if so remove the actuator, replace the gasket, tighten to spec and it should be fine.

2. More common the threaded fitting and angled seat is leaking. Sounds like you have been undoing the line there so that is most likely the issue, I'd remove it again, clean both the threads and actuator with brake clean then retighten. No point adding thread tape / teflon sealer there as the sealing is in the flange not the thread.

90% I'd guess it is #2, and an easy fix. You might have to bleed the ATTESSA afterwards.

As always Duncan, thanks man. You always come in clutch.

Ok so I removed and reinstalled #1 a few times. After looking through the service manual I found out this was the actuator that is fed from the reservoir in the boot as you mentioned through a few hoses and a high pressure one. When I removed it, there was no gasket. Once I looked into it and through the forums I saw the actuator has a built in gasket in the actuator itself. 

Side question: the metal rod in there. Is there a specific way it goes? It's rounded on both sides and I'm sure it's what the actuator pushes on to engage the transfer case to transfer the torque to the front wheels.

In regards to #2, the threaded fitting and angle seat. Which is this? Is this what connects to the actuator itself? If it is a line that connects to the actuator, I never undid it but I can double check it's tight, it could have come loose when I unbolted the 2 bolts off the actuator that connects it to the transfer case those couple times. 

You are right, luckily both are accessible and don't require me to drop the trans  or anything crazy. I need to make some time this weekend to knock it out.

Again I appreciate the help.

Right, that makes sense. Yes you can just remove the line from the actuator instead of removing the whole actuator. That has the downside of losing your boot ATTESSA fluid and having to rebleed (unless you can block it some how) but the benefit you've found of not stuffing with the actuator gasket.

I can't find anything in the manual about Actuator re-assembly, so I'd make a gasket from paper and add some of that dark brown gasket harder stuff, then re-assemble. If there is an old gasket stuck to the actuator flange, definitely remove that

16 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Right, that makes sense. Yes you can just remove the line from the actuator instead of removing the whole actuator. That has the downside of losing your boot ATTESSA fluid and having to rebleed (unless you can block it some how) but the benefit you've found of not stuffing with the actuator gasket.

I can't find anything in the manual about Actuator re-assembly, so I'd make a gasket from paper and add some of that dark brown gasket harder stuff, then re-assemble. If there is an old gasket stuck to the actuator flange, definitely remove that

I'm not worried about the fluid in the reservoir. It's pretty low that a flush is required anyways and when I change those hoses out for new ones I'm sure I'll loose the rest. I'll have to refill and bleed it anyways. 

Ok so I'll make a paper gasket and use some RTV to help seal it. Got both on hand. I was curious about that as well. 

39 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

RTV is not for sealing gaskets. Use a proper gasket compound.

Noted. I'll look one up and see what the local parts store got, otherwise I'll order it. Don't plan on working on it until the weekend. 

Edit: this is the one I got. Would this not work? It's what came up when I googled "gasket compound". 

Screenshot_20230626_223957_Walmart.thumb.jpg.ab81d248923d897b290277b97c0d54bc.jpg

Edited by Jjtxaz24
Added picture

That's a "gasket maker", which you would use in place of a gasket. Examples would include sump or cam cover flanges, in metal to metal contact, where no paper gasket was intended to be used.

That will likely work on the ATTESA actuator, if the metal to metal contact surfaces are really nice and the insertion depth is not critical. If the insertion depth is dependent on the thickness of a gasket, then it is better to use the correct gasket.

Note I am not all that familiar with the actuator.

  • Thanks 1
12 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

That's a "gasket maker", which you would use in place of a gasket. Examples would include sump or cam cover flanges, in metal to metal contact, where no paper gasket was intended to be used.

That will likely work on the ATTESA actuator, if the metal to metal contact surfaces are really nice and the insertion depth is not critical. If the insertion depth is dependent on the thickness of a gasket, then it is better to use the correct gasket.

Note I am not all that familiar with the actuator.

I can say with confidence that the actuator is a metal on metal surface and flat with no indentation to run a seam. I don't believe depth is critical. It sits flush against the back of the transfer case and then it gets torqued down to like 50 ftlbs (can't remember off the top of my head at the moment)

Here's a picture of it. Screenshot_20230626_232343_Brave.thumb.jpg.d7af08bd12c6e6d06180fb1192ce27fd.jpg

Edited by Jjtxaz24

Yep, it is not designed for silicone / rtv etc, that is why I suggested making a gasket and adding a sealant as you've had trouble in the past.

I meant stuff like this which you apply to a paper gasket:

https://www.permatex.com/products/gasketing/gasket-sealants/permatex-high-tack-gasket-sealant-16-oz/

Permatex-High-Tack-Gasket-Sealant-16-OZ-

I'm not a sealant specialist but I understand locktite 515 and equivalent products might be a more modern option which replace a paper gasket

https://www.blackwoods.com.au/adhesives-sealants-fillers/thread-sealants-and-threadlockers/henkel-loctite-515-flange-sealants/master-gasket-flex-loctite-515-300ml/p/05894512

LOCTITE 515 FLEXI GASKET 50ML FLANGE SEALANT ELIMINATOR -54 + 149C ...

  • Thanks 1
5 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

AFAIK the OEM sealant is actually Loctite 518, listed as p/n C133531X25 if you buy it from Nissan. Checking online I do not see any paper gasket or anything like that for the actuator: https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/bcnr33/3935-rb26dett/trans/333/30570X/

Sounds good. I'd assume like Duncan suggested that loctite would be very similar if not better to the nissan flavor. I also searched and didn't see a gasket required

8 hours ago, Jjtxaz24 said:

Sounds good. I'd assume like Duncan suggested that loctite would be very similar if not better to the nissan flavor. I also searched and didn't see a gasket required

When I searched up that part number it was literally a tube of Loctite 518 in a Nissan box. I'm just not sure what the difference is between 515 and 518. Both are anaerobic sealants with similar methacrylate base. As far as I can tell it's just a color difference and 515 needs a longer cure time.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
6 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

When I searched up that part number it was literally a tube of Loctite 518 in a Nissan box. I'm just not sure what the difference is between 515 and 518. Both are anaerobic sealants with similar methacrylate base. As far as I can tell it's just a color difference and 515 needs a longer cure time.

That's good to know. Ordered the 515 should be here Thursday so I'll get it done this weekend. Then I'll wait for the next problem to come up...

Anyone on here know how to tune with NISTune by any chance? Lol. 

Sounds like there is a tear in the actuator boot. Use 518 not 515. There is no gasket between the Attesa actuator and transfer case, it relies on the boot of the actuator itself to seal with just an oil film or 518 usually. Failing that, Threebond the mf'er in with 1207C.

 

 

On 7/1/2023 at 4:16 AM, BK said:

Sounds like there is a tear in the actuator boot. Use 518 not 515. There is no gasket between the Attesa actuator and transfer case, it relies on the boot of the actuator itself to seal with just an oil film or 518 usually. Failing that, Threebond the mf'er in with 1207C.

 

 

Saw this post after I ordered the 515. I've already drained the transfer case, and ran a bead to let it cure. Did it Friday and went out of town so hopefully when I get back I can fill it and top off the ATTESSA reservoir in the trunk and bleed the system. Also replaced those hoses. 

I took off the shifter boot and replaced it with a new one. What if that was where it was leaking from too? Boot was torn and worn out. The new one fits snug and I put a zip tie around the bottom to hopefully keep it secure and the ATF fluid in.

10 hours ago, Jjtxaz24 said:

Saw this post after I ordered the 515. I've already drained the transfer case, and ran a bead to let it cure. Did it Friday and went out of town so hopefully when I get back I can fill it and top off the ATTESSA reservoir in the trunk and bleed the system. Also replaced those hoses. 

I took off the shifter boot and replaced it with a new one. What if that was where it was leaking from too? Boot was torn and worn out. The new one fits snug and I put a zip tie around the bottom to hopefully keep it secure and the ATF fluid in.

I took the time to stare at the technical data sheets more carefully, Loctite 518 is more tolerant of bad machining. Both are supposedly fine with a 0.25mm gap but 518 has a lot more shear strength than 515 in that scenario. Both have comparable engine oil tolerance but only 518 is specifically tested for ATF tolerance. 518 actually has less shear strength at 100C than 515 assuming you have that 0.05mm maximum gap. If the 515 fails to seal I would try the 518 and see if that improves anything.

  • Thanks 2
3 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

I took the time to stare at the technical data sheets more carefully, Loctite 518 is more tolerant of bad machining. Both are supposedly fine with a 0.25mm gap but 518 has a lot more shear strength than 515 in that scenario. Both have comparable engine oil tolerance but only 518 is specifically tested for ATF tolerance. 518 actually has less shear strength at 100C than 515 assuming you have that 0.05mm maximum gap. If the 515 fails to seal I would try the 518 and see if that improves anything.

Excellent information, particularly re ATF resistance since that is what the xfer case and actuator both run.

33 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

I took the time to stare at the technical data sheets more carefully, Loctite 518 is more tolerant of bad machining. Both are supposedly fine with a 0.25mm gap but 518 has a lot more shear strength than 515 in that scenario. Both have comparable engine oil tolerance but only 518 is specifically tested for ATF tolerance. 518 actually has less shear strength at 100C than 515 assuming you have that 0.05mm maximum gap. If the 515 fails to seal I would try the 518 and see if that improves anything.

This is excellent information to have  I will report back if the leak is still persistent. 

28 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Excellent information, particularly re ATF resistance since that is what the xfer case and actuator both run.

Agreed. Our boy Josh doing the dirty work. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...