Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Personally I'd stick with ATI.. either 750 or 1000hp version, and stick a trigger kit too while youre at it. Lots of choices for trigger kits.. dont have to get PRP if you dont want to. Either way, wont get much change from 2knz. In saying that, the NZ Wiring CAS is an excellent upgrade too from stock.. lots of guys run them. Depends how much you want to fork out really and how hard youll be pushing your setup.

  • Like 1

We must be related.

I use a NZ Cam trigger kit with an ATI balancer. I needed to get a custom PS pulley to suit the RB25 PS pump from Hi Octane Racing.

Motor hasn't exploded yet, makes 437kW, has seen half a dozen track days at SMSP, 2x silly wannabe Power cruise events and runs AC.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
1 hour ago, Predator1 said:

In saying that, the NZ Wiring CAS is an excellent upgrade too from stock.. lots of guys run them. Depends how much you want to fork out really and how hard youll be pushing your setup.

Heres one as we speak! :D

34 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

We must be related.

I use a NZ Cam trigger kit with an ATI balancer. I needed to get a custom PS pulley to suit the RB25 PS pump from Hi Octane Racing.

Motor hasn't exploded yet, makes 437kW, has seen half a dozen track days at SMSP, 2x silly wannabe Power cruise events and runs AC.

 

  • Like 1
22 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

We must be related.

I use a NZ Cam trigger kit with an ATI balancer. I needed to get a custom PS pulley to suit the RB25 PS pump from Hi Octane Racing.

Motor hasn't exploded yet, makes 437kW, has seen half a dozen track days at SMSP, 2x silly wannabe Power cruise events and runs AC.

Do you reckon the ATI is better than the Ross? No one seems to have an ATI for a 25 in NZ at the moment.

What was up with the PS pulley?

Goes from a cam belt, service, into a 4k job, typical lol.

23 hours ago, Predator1 said:

Personally I'd stick with ATI.. either 750 or 1000hp version, and stick a trigger kit too while youre at it. Lots of choices for trigger kits.. dont have to get PRP if you dont want to. Either way, wont get much change from 2knz. In saying that, the NZ Wiring CAS is an excellent upgrade too from stock.. lots of guys run them. Depends how much you want to fork out really and how hard youll be pushing your setup.

Seems slightly more economical to do the Ross if doing the trigger, although can't seem to find an ATI in NZ at the moment.

2 hours ago, Dose dependent said:

Do you reckon the ATI is better than the Ross? No one seems to have an ATI for a 25 in NZ at the moment.

What was up with the PS pulley?

Goes from a cam belt, service, into a 4k job, typical lol.

I personally don't like Ross, and especially after they sold me a PS idler kit that was poorly designed and doesn't work with the RB25 out of the box.

Another person has the same issue too.

I emailed them numerous times, sent them photos, videos, etc. and they've ghosted me the pricks.

36-2 balancer is the biz. Personally prefer it over a gear with teeth. 

I run an ATI 36-2 custom wheel on my street car as it has Aircon 

Putting a ross 36-2 on my race car, no AC. 

 

I'll look up the company that did the ATI if your interested, sit down price though :)

8 hours ago, Butters said:

36-2 balancer is the biz. Personally prefer it over a gear with teeth. 

I run an ATI 36-2 custom wheel on my street car as it has Aircon 

Putting a ross 36-2 on my race car, no AC. 

 

I'll look up the company that did the ATI if your interested, sit down price though :)

Car doesn't have AC, it's already turning into an expensive service lol

9 hours ago, Butters said:

36-2 balancer is the biz. Personally prefer it over a gear with teeth. 

I run an ATI 36-2 custom wheel on my street car as it has Aircon 

Putting a ross 36-2 on my race car, no AC. 

 

I'll look up the company that did the ATI if your interested, sit down price though :)

Is it the ATI for a 26? Ghosting with issues isn't good 

FWIW I run an ATI R33 RB26 balancer on my car, however with this RB25 PS pulley from Hi Octane Racing.

https://www.hioctanedirect.com/Hi-Octane-Racing-R33-GTST-ATI-Power-Steering-Pulley-SUIT-750-HP-Balancer

 

46 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

FWIW I run an ATI R33 RB26 balancer on my car, however with this RB25 PS pulley from Hi Octane Racing.

https://www.hioctanedirect.com/Hi-Octane-Racing-R33-GTST-ATI-Power-Steering-Pulley-SUIT-750-HP-Balancer

 

Says it works with the 750hp balancer, can only find the 1000hp version here? I'm more lost now lol

 

@Butters Are you using the full Ross trigger kit?

On 4/9/2024 at 6:27 AM, Dose dependent said:

Is it the ATI for a 26? Ghosting with issues isn't good 

Yes Rb26

I am using an Ignite 5.0 bottom/crank trigger on the ATI and will be doing the same on the ROSS.

On one setup I have VCAM so using that sensor as the top/cam trigger. *cough Toyota style ... *cough

On the other I am using an Ignite 5.0 cam trigger.

 

I also use link ecu too, so once you get sync, the ecu runs completely off the crank. You can literally unplug the cam sensor once started.  I get zero trigger issues and drive the car weekly. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...