Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My friend just said a turbo engine last around 150k where as N/A cars last longer.

Is that true?

Only 150k?

What then? Engine rebuild? Get engine from half cuts?

Costing?

This is so heart killing! I never heard such :bs!: before... (or I am just plain stupid and know nothing about engines)

I mean, that metal thing under the bonnet I paid so much cash is not gonna only last 150k!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48960-how-long-does-a-turbo-engine-last/
Share on other sites

Shoot your friend in the head so he stops spreading complete and utter bullsh1t...

Your engine, if kept in good condition and serviced regularly and kept in standard guise will last many hundreds of thousands of kms.

As you modify it, and extract more power out of it, the expected life of the engine decreases accordingly. You can't expect a 300rwkw RB25 to last as long as a stock one right?

As one person on the forums likes to say: "A candle that burns twice as bright, lasts half as long"

im that friend hehe..

im only stating what ive seen from experience..

i've seen 2 turbo engines die at 150,000km even though they got serviced regularly and midly modded..

its different for everyone of course..

it probably won't die but it will probably start showing few probs unless ur a granny driver or have it bone stock..

im that friend hehe..

im only stating what ive seen from experience..

i've seen 2 turbo engines die at 150,000km even though they got serviced regularly and midly modded..

its different for everyone of course..

it probably won't die but it will probably start showing few probs unless ur a granny driver or have it bone stock..

im that friend hehe.. its not compete bullshit.. jus depends on the circumstances..

im only stating what ive seen from experience..

i've seen 2 turbo engines die at 150,000km even though they got serviced regularly and midly modded..

its different for everyone of course..

it probably won't die but it will probably start showing few probs unless ur a granny driver or have it bone stock..

im that friend hehe.. its not compete bullshit.. jus depends on the circumstances..

im only stating what ive seen from experience..

i've seen 2 turbo engines die at 150,000km even though they got serviced regularly and midly modded..

its different for everyone of course..

it probably won't die but it will probably start showing few probs unless ur a granny driver or have it bone stock..

saying that a turbo engine will only last "around 150k" kms, as stated by supra, is COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSH1T.

And seeing 2 engines die at 150,000kms doesn't give you any authority to go around spreading such lavicious and contemptuous lies...

I've seen 2 or 3 N/A engines die at under 50,000kms... Should I go around telling people that N/A engines only last 50,000kms? :)

i've seen 2 turbo engines die at 150,000km even though they got serviced regularly and midly modded..

even if they were "150,000km" they could have really done 250,000.. so you can't really tell off the listed km. Again, maybe its regularly serviced - but by who and using what quality items, and how well has it been tuned? And maybe now they are "mildly modified" but in Japan they could have had a T67 strapped to its side for 10 years of its life and how would you know? And how do you have absolutely any firm idea of how they've been serviced in Japan before arriving in Australia or how it was treated?? So I still call :bs!: on your ass..

But sure, more forces, blah, blah on a turbo engine but don't forget they are tested WITH a turbo for long-life and built with similarly stronger internal components. Its like saying an 8 cylinder car with 200kw will last less than a 4cylinder car with 80kw.. its simply not true.

nothing u guys have stated necessarily mean thru god and all his almighty power that they won't fail either..

i agree my first state was misleading but i have corrected myself..

anyways.. disregarding this 'sense of authority' and 'utter bullshit'

it depends on the driver, how they drive their car and their circumstances as i have said earlier which is not bullshit..

All I can say is, If you give me a N/A car to drive I will bet it won’t get past 50,000km untill it dies. But if a grammar drove the same car from 0ks. It would last 300,000kms

Likes wise, with a Turbo Charged car.

But..... you have to weigh up the difference, When a N/A car goes full noise the pistons, rods and crank don’t move any where as fast, as what a Turbo car does, so naturally theirs going to be more wear on a Turbo car then N/A car.

my turbo engine only lasted 1 day.

c'mon seriously, how could you say a whole class of engines is worse than another type? You might as well say Honda engines are crap and holden ones are great. They are all different, have different purposes, outputs etc etc etc.

One thing is true for sure, its easier to break a turbo engine. Just turn up the boost, leave the stock computer, rev it to the redline all the time, turn it off hot, don't warm it up, put in bad quality oil every 10000klm.

Treat it properly with good tuning, within its designed limits and it will be *fine*

Basically all the things that your skyline boy-racer likes doing.

any RB motor lasts for ages, mine has had no problems and a mate of mine has a VL commodore and it has done 350 000km and it is still running like new.it has never caused him major problems exept for little oil leaks but thats about it.

One thing is true for sure, its easier to break a turbo engine. Just turn up the boost, leave the stock computer, rev it to the redline all the time, turn it off hot, don't warm it up, put in bad quality oil every 10,000klm.

Yes, exactly. I just sold my VL turbo with ~200,000 KM on it, 5,000 km oil change, always Mobil 1 & never caned when cold - it felt as though it had a lot of life left in the engine. That was the best bit of the car...

So I'd say stock RB turbo engines are potentially long lived, but if you boost it maybe not. But a fool can kill any engine, my mechanic once showed me a 3 year old Civic, 45,000 km & run dry of oil - full rebuild out of warranty - OUCH!

Z

Mine now has just under 180,000km (indicated) on it. Since 100k it's been running a wastegate bleed and exhaust, and since ~150k it's had the T3/4, PowerFC and a slightly raised redline (7500rpm). It's been to the drags a few times, and does see its fair share of spirited driving, but it also gets regular servicing and plenty of mechanical sympathy.

A motor that is turbo'd from the factory is engineered to be turbocharged. As someone mentioned before, this means that the entire motor is designed to take the kind of forces higher than atmospheric pressures can put on it. They're no more likely to fall apart than an NA motor.

Two points:

1) It's already been covered, but turbo engines tend to be very easy to get 'a bit' more power out of, so heaps of people do so. The problem is that commonly the ECU is left untuned, despite the stock computer often operating outside of its usual parameters.

2) Turbo engines (with the general exception of diesels) tend to be 'sporty' engines, and as such, tend to see more hard use than your average NA engine.

With similar use, I don't see why a well-maintained turbo motor couldn't last just as long as a well-maintained NA motor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • it was good to see our presence at GTR festival..hope to see more SAU at these events 
    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
×
×
  • Create New...