Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have just had a HKS Adjustable Exhaust cam gear fitted to my R33 Series II GTS-T 96 model.

ITs got a powerfc, full exhaust and split dump, pod filter, 11psi, and 10% mix of toluene.

My mechanic, very respected, (just got 300rwkw out of a VL turbo that day for an example just tuning it) put the cam gear in, and set it to 1,2,3,4 degrees retard, and 2,3,4 degrees advance, and every position the car lost power,

The only position the car made good power was at 0 degrees.

Anyone seen this before? I thought 4 degrees retard was supposed to make more power in the bottom end?

:)

He's tuning the power FC and has managed to push it from 160rwkw to 180 so far, and like 2 hours

He says there is more to go yet

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52256-cam-gear-results-not-good/
Share on other sites

I have just had a HKS Adjustable Exhaust cam gear fitted to my R33 Series II GTS-T 96 model.

ITs got a powerfc, full exhaust and split dump, pod filter, 11psi, and 10% mix of toluene.

My mechanic, very respected, (just got  300rwkw out of a VL turbo that day for an example just tuning it) put the cam gear in, and set it to 1,2,3,4 degrees retard, and 2,3,4 degrees advance, and every position the car lost power,

The only position the car made good power was at 0 degrees.

Anyone seen this before? I thought 4 degrees retard was supposed to make more power in the bottom end?

:(

He's tuning the power FC and has managed to push it from 160rwkw to 180 so far, and like 2 hours

He says there is more to go yet

I agree with Bass, I know it is obvious but you never know. The CAS is connected to the camshaft itself, not the camshaftpulley. It looks like the CAS is connected to the pulley but it's not. I have seen very experienced mechanics make this mistake. If you retard the camshaft 4 degrees, you retard the ignition timing 4 degrees. So everytime you adjust the cam timing you have to reset the igntion timing with a timing light.

If you have been watching and he hasn't used a timing light to check the ignition timing then that's your problem. :spcartman

Hope that is of some help.

so why does it work for some and not for others?I personally think there are gains to be had.I have never done it b4 only heard mixed emotions on it more postitive than negative.

Personally i think that there are gains to be had and if you go to someone or are that someone who knows what they are doing when it comes to this kind of tune they could prove it also.

Not to much longer b4 my theory is put into practice on my car.

seems like latter model s2 r33 and R34 seem to get less gains than the others.. few people have xperienced this in the past. Could be something to do with the slightly different VVT setup in the newer cars.

But there are plenty of older threads on it.

I am going to start another thread about it, but he left the cam gear at 0 degrees and went and tuned the powerFC.

Here are the results.

Sydneykid, I appreciate your input, and will most certainly let him know. He is a very very experienced mechanic, but hey, not everyone can know everything. I am sure he will love the information, and most certainly try it.

I love the world of free knowledge.

pcy.JPG

ok, I spoke to my mechanic thismorning, and he said that whenever he adjusted the cam gear, he reset the Base timing with a timing light, this guy is pretty on the ball even though he hasn't really done a cam gear before on a skyline. He didn't really know what to expect.

Maybe the Series II's have differenty VVT or something, and the power is already tehre, and just needs a PFC to tap into it?

He said it was very easy to get that power, but didn't want to go too much further because he didn't want to risk detonation.

I reckon thats awesome power for only 10.5 - 11psi, and its so smooth, doesn't hit hard, its like got heaps of torque from the word go.

Pull the hardest at about 5k though.

Awesome to drive now.

On my R34 they did buff fu(k nothing.

Cost me $600 in workshop and dyno time (At Hypertech) to find this out for all of you.

Check out this thread.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...light=Cam+Gears

Can anyone confirm that cam gears don't work on late model RB25's?

I was looking at fitting one to my S2

mine came back yesterday (R33 S2) and cam gear picked up extra kW most of the way thru with around 15kW at the top end. they work fine.

mine came back yesterday (R33 S2) and cam gear picked up extra kW most of the way thru with around 15kW at the top end.  they work fine.

Thats a really good result, a couple of questions though.......

What cam gear did you get installed?

where did you get it installed and tuned?

You only need the exhaust cam gear right?

Cheers

Don't murder me but I'm pretty sure as the Rbs got newer, Nissan closed the lobe centres up. The early models ran very wide separation angles (Just like the VL turbo) but with newer models they closed them up gradually and increased overlap.

By what you guys are saying the gains are had by retarding the exhaust cam- is this right? If so then you are doing what nissan did with the later model hence less power increase because they have already moved them to a lesser extent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
    • I think the consensus was that's normal. Sloped road surfaces or something? I remember @silviaz went through this before. It might be one of those things you never notice until you pay attention to it.
    • Im not entirely sure exactly what or where its leaking from, he started to pull the boots to swap to my new tie rods + ends and it just vomited fluid, so he closed em up up, swapped the rod ends to the old rods and let me know so I can figure a solution out, im guessing its all origional as as I passed 103k miles earlier this year im sure its just in need of a full overhual/rebuild anyways.    If i could just yank it off and be good it wouldn't be an issue to ship it out and wait for the turnaround but the guy I work with doesnt really have space to keep my car for a week or two at a time, would rather drop it off and have a replacement ready to drop in
×
×
  • Create New...