Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all

I am thinking about upgrading the suspension on my R32 GTST type m....

What is the best value for money way to do this?

- coil overs, sway bars, strut bars, etc.

Just buy a set of aftermarket adjustable coilovers? Or is it best to do all the

above (coil overs, sway bars, strut bars) at once?

The car is completely standard & I want to spend as little as possible.

How much i am looking at for a set of new coilovers? and where is best to buy them from?

Appreciate any input guys

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52716-r32-gtst-suspension/
Share on other sites

Without doubt i think the best value susp upgrade for your R32 is a set of swaybars. I have Whiteline adjustable blades and was very happy with the improvement.

Id hold off on getting shocks and springs until you have some adjustment in your susp by way of eccentric bushes (from experience again i can say the Whiteline ones are better then Nolathane ones, i havent tried Notlec) as if you lower you car with new springs and shocks then you will likely have poor camber/castor settings dictating that tyre wear wotn be great.

So i think swaybars, then bushes, then shocks/springs...only my opinion though

I went down the path of jap coilovers, adjustable front camber bushes and adjustable castor rods, alloy cradle bushes, HICAS lock bar and I like the way my car handles. It is quite low, probably a bit excessive (tops of the tyres just under the guards) but its ok

The only grizzle I have is jap coilovers are VERY firm in the spring rates (my car will lift a wheel up in the air if going up a steep driveway at a angle etc) Sometimes they are too firm, espeically if the road surface is a bit dodgy. I have also had to get my coilovers rebuilt, so they have ended up costing me more than new local shocks

If I was to start from sratch I'd get the bushes and castor rods, swaybars and then get some Bilstein shocks with some decent spings

It depends what you want to end up with and how you want your car to handle and your driving style.

For a instant improvement its hard to go past lower, stiffer springs and new shocks, jsut make sure you don't go too low and make sure you get at least some adjustable front camber and castor bushes

nice thread. :rofl:

i'm running KYB sr-special jap coilovers with sustec springs, strut bar front and back, dialed off camber on 17" 235/265.

i found that going straight to the jap coilovers improved handling alot and the strut bars added ALOT of rigidity to the body of the car.

i can't sleep every night, because since my friend about 2 years ago got his dc2 type-r, which he has just upgraded to a jdm-spec dc5 (which i sit in and drive nearly every second day) he has handed my ass to me everywhere except for straight lines. i know i know, fwd vs rwd. they are made for that, esp. the type-r, but i still think they are amazing machines. anyway...

funnily enough i drive a supra with the same sus mods, kyb shocks and springs with strut bars and it handles amazing well. except it has major axle tramp so its need or some cradle bushes i think...

Dunno what type of car places there are in QLD, for the strut braces there are quite a few on eBay that can be had quite cheaply, otherwise try have a look through the for sale section

Springs and shocks are best bought new, as they are a item that does wear out and you don't want to waste money on stuffed up shocks - money spent here now will save you heaps down the track

The place that rebuilt my shocks where in QLD, there website is www.shockreco.com.au they should be able to help you out. Last time I spoke to them they had a set of coilovers for a R32GTSt that they where trying to get rid off. Just remember if you buy shocks that you can't personally inspect, make sure they are for GTSt not GTR, as the rear shocks are differant

Good luck, if I spot anything I will let you know

Chris

I've driven a R32 with whiteline springs/shocks. I must say I was very impressed.

The ride is basically stock smoothness but as soon as you start flicking it through the corners its sits perfectly flat and hasn't lost the stock oversteer feel.

The last thing you want is a setup that understeers. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...