Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have an R33 GTR with a pair of GT-RS's. What can be done to bring boost on a little quicker? The car has good top end power now (obviously), it is currently making about 340rwkw on 1.3 bar.

Target boost is currently reached at about 5800RPM in the higher gears.

The car has adjustable cam gears, but they are set to zero degrees on both sides as we found this to be the best.

All internals are stock, but other mods are:

550 injectors

HKS dumps

NISMO tuned length front pipes

Trust MX 80mm exhaust

Power FC and boost control kit

I have been told that the exhaust is choking it, hence spool up is slow. I tried dropping off the exhaust from the front pipes and going for a run, things improved VERY slightly (like 100RPM), so I don't think this is a problem.

The wastegate actuators are adjusted to be quite hard (crack at about 1 bar)

I don't want to pull the engine out of the car, as the engine is still very healthy (perfect compression and leakdown), so oversize pistons and higher compression is not an option.

The only other option is a pair of drop in cams. What sort of difference would a pair of say Tomei PONCAMS make to midrange power? They make two types, both with 260 intake and one with either 256 or 260 exhaust duration. I'm assuming the pair of 260s would be best for the big turbines?

Are there any other better cams that will fit straight in using standard valve springs and without machining the head?

I would be over the moon to have target boost at 5000RPM. Is this possible, or should I just swap the turbos for a pair of 2530s or N1s? I know these will be on full song at 4500RPM.

Also, I'm getting compressor surge at low RPM in high gears, I'm assuming the extra air flow form a pair of cams will stop this. Is this wishfull thinking?

Thanks in advance

Also, I'm getting compressor surge at low RPM in high gears

I'm no expert so I'll leave it to them but do you have a balance pipe between each pipe before the turbos? I'm sure I read in another thread this can cause probs if it does'nt.

Hi Mik, the general consensus from GTR owners around the world is that GTRS's are too big for 2.6 litres. A set of camshafts would help, as would a light port of the cylinder head and an increase in compression ratio. As for cams, 256/260/264 would be OK, keep the lift under 9 mm. I haven't found any particular brand which outshines the others when used in GTR's. Personally I find the 256/260 Poncams are superior in GTST's, but that has not, to date, been the case in GTR's.

Hope that helps :)

Hi Mik, the general consensus from GTR owners around the world is that GTRS's are too big for 2.6 litres.  A set of camshafts would help, as would a light port of the cylinder head and an increase in compression ratio.  As for cams, 256/260/264 would be OK, keep the lift under 9 mm.  I haven't found any particular brand which outshines the others when used in GTR's.  Personally I find the 256/260 Poncams are superior in GTST's, but that has not, to date, been the case in GTR's.

Hope that helps :)

Thanks SK. Are you saying the poncams haven't been good in GTRs or that you havent tried them? I think the poncam's lift is about 9.2mm. Do you think that's too much lift for the standard valvetrain, or will it be okay?

I guess there's not that much else I can do is there? Without taking the eninge out that is. But if I were to do that, I'd sooner swap the turbos for a pair of 2530s or N1s.

Thanks SK. Are you saying the poncams haven't been good in GTRs or that you havent tried them? I think the poncam's lift is about 9.2mm. Do you think that's too much lift for the standard valvetrain, or will it be okay?

I guess there's not that much else I can do is there? Without taking the eninge out that is. But if I were to do that, I'd sooner swap the turbos for a pair of 2530s or N1s.

Tomei call them Poncams because they are bolt in (no other mods). If they say 9.2 mm is OK with standard everything else then it must be OK. Tomei do make cams that are not Poncams ie; they need mods to fit.

When I have used the 256/260 's in RB25DET's they are demonstrably superior to any others I have tried or see the results of. I have not seen this same superiority in their GTR cams. They are as good as the others, but not better.

I suggest you give the cam upgrade a try before you swap out the turbos, you might find that it is enough for your tastes.:)

Hi meshmesh, Mark has spoken to me a number of times about his set up. :wavey:

Mik, Your not alone. I have a pair of Trust T517z in my R33, not sure how these compare to GT - Rs, I think they are close in term of total output power (330 - 360kw at 4 wheels on 22psi). I also have a susbtantial amount of lag over the stock items - to be expected. I seem to have full boost at about 4800 - 5000. I have done many of the other mods you mentioned and have been brainstorming ideas to lower my lag time with little success - came to a similar conclusion cams, cam gears, etc. Wonder how quick a pair of 2510s spool up? - pity it would be a massive top end sacrifice!

T517zGTR, a couple of sau members have these turbos, JAGR33 & Ph1, I've for a drive with JAGR33, and yes they're alot laggier than the 2530's, but damn they hit hard. I have a comparison thread somewhere in one of my threads. JAGR33 ended up getting Ben from Racepace in Melbourne to sort the lag out, and so far seems alot happier. Perhaps give Ben a call, a see what he suggest, Ben also built Ph1's car..

As far as bolt in cams for gtr's go HKS Step1's have longer duration with 272 been the biggest bolt in with 8.5mm lift . The tomei poncams have a higher lift of 9.1mm but the duration is smaller with 260 been the biggest you can go . Im probably gonna use HKS 264 inlet 272 exhaust with 8.5mm lift to try bring the single turbo on a bit sooner.

As far as bolt in cams for gtr's go HKS Step1's have longer duration with 272 been the biggest bolt in with 8.5mm lift . The tomei poncams have a higher lift of 9.1mm but the duration is smaller with 260 been the biggest you can go . Im probably gonna use HKS 264  inlet 272 exhaust with 8.5mm lift to try bring the single turbo  on a bit sooner.

It has been my experience that higher lift will help more than longer duration.:P

Yeh i was interested to know this. But from 8.5 to 9.1 would that be a noticable difference ?

That is a massive difference.

I think 272s would kill the idle a little too much for my liking.

SK,

Do you think the 260s would be better than the 256/260 for my application? I think I will drop in a set of cams and keep the GT-RSs for now. If it doesn't work out, the cams won't be wasted with smaller turbines anyway.

I have attatched the GTRS graph from the HKS website. I would love to know what has been done to that engine, because it looks like the engine is making 1.8kg boost at about 5000RPM. I guess the Jap fuel helps because you can run heaps of timing on spoolup.

Is the R34 RB26 a bit better than the R33 version? Or is the extra torque on the R34 over the R33 just due to ECU mapping?

ha I GOT A GTR RUN 260 DEG PONCAM STD INTERNVALS WITH BALL BEARING GARRETS RUN 518HP AT THE WHEELS ON 18 PSI AND WE PICK UP OVER 100 HP WITH THE CAMS AND ADJUSTABLE CAM WHEELS SO I THINK THE PONCAMS WORK JUST FINE

Mick just my two paseos worth not from experience . I think Nissan intended the RB26DETT to run like two 1300cc' engines on a common crank . I look at them as three 430 odd cc cylinders feeding each turbo on seperate manifolds . It looks to me like the GTRS (Garrett GT2871R) was intended for 2 to 2.5L engines in road tune . These turbos use compressor wheels a significant amount larger than the turbine ie 71 and 54mm . The GT2530's use 60mm diameter compressor wheels better suited to turbine (same) . While the GTRS's work better than the 2540's I see them as a compromise just less than the 2540's . I'm not sure what your power and drivability expectations are but its questionable if the GTRS's can deliver . If not you may be able to sell them and fit something that suits you better .

cheers A .

ha I GOT A GTR RUN 260 DEG PONCAM STD INTERNVALS WITH BALL BEARING GARRETS RUN 518HP AT THE WHEELS ON 18 PSI AND WE PICK UP OVER 100 HP WITH THE CAMS AND ADJUSTABLE CAM WHEELS SO I THINK THE PONCAMS WORK JUST FINE

Did they bolt straight in or did u have to setup the shims again ? Also what did u set the cams too ? HKS seem to work best set on zero.

the 260deg poncams have 9.15mm of lift. I'd say they are a good option, you will have plenty more airflow room at 4000rpm onwards.

You want the turbo's to come in 'faster' ie; take less 'time' to hit power. This is appart from the rpm issue. Things like a set of lightened greddy pulleys and the replacement of the factory fan with a davies craig 16inch thermo will reduce the 'time' for the engine to reach revs. As will a good lightweight flywheel and even (if you have $4k or so) a single peice carbon fibre tail shaft (they weight about half the factory one).

A higher flowing intercooler might be the go as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
    • lol nice, I wouldn't worry about sanding back the filler to check for rust then. Yep very much a thing. Personally I don't do the panel beating, its very easy to have a panel beater sort that out for you. If they aren't doing any prep work the actual panel beating generally doesn't take long at all.  Have you taken before pictures before you started this project? I'd be keen to see the before and afters when you're done.
    • Some good discussion in here, for the most part I can't really add too much to it - thought I'd add some notes to the datalog screen shot that probably aren't news to anyone but a good prop... this is assuming 25psi-ish should be the boost ceiling given the first post refers to 23psi.   To state the obvious, this issue seems super weird.  Turbo speed seems pretty lethagic to build, like the turbo isn't getting as much drive as it needs - and it doesn't help that wgdc keeps rising AFTER boost target then completely shuts duty at a point, which in theory should have the straight gate dump heaps past the turbo and funnily enough causes the huge drop off.  It seems like pretty blunt boost control tuning but I'd not call that the primary issue, so much as possibly not helping the situation. I'm curious, what does a pull look like with purely mechanical boost control?  Like purely wastegate?   There are things in this log and story that make it sound like there could be a significant restriction in the intercooler piping or something - but then it's also overshooting boost target which is NOT what you'd expect with a restriction.   I can see where people are coming from with the non-linear wastegate bypass (not that any valves are linear for this kind of thing), but it still doesn't make sense that it can't hold <20psi on a 12psi spring.    Have you, or can you try measuring pressure pre-intercooler?  Be pretty interesting to see what's happening there vs in the intake manifold - sorry if I've repeated old ground, I've kinda skimmed over but I could have missed something.  In terms of comments regarding the wg spring being closer to boost target, I haven't used a straight gate but part of the reason for having close to wg target is about fighting backpressure as well - I might be wrong, but I'd have thought that part of the point of using a butterfly valve like the straight gate does you actually don't have to resist pressure at all, on EITHER side of the gate.   It shouldn't need too much leverage to start opening, the spring being more to do with where it triggers opening as opposed to resisting boost & EMAP, though smarter people can correct me if I'm wrong there.  
×
×
  • Create New...