Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.prestigemotorsport.com.au/?/au/...sp?StockID=2626

They say this car appears to have a genuine 24,000kms, who are they kidding, it does look a fair bit cleaner then the average import being shipped down under, have a look at the engine bay pics, that engine looks pretty tired..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53359-look-at-this-import-r33-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if that car came from a certain supplier I wouldn't be surprised, they have a tendancy to deal in cars with wound back odo's from what I've been told by their customers and ex-employees :D

So much criticism.

Compared to some of the other complete shite heaps that pop up that looks like an exceptional car for the money. Stock standard and un-molestered, thats the best way to buy. The fact that paint has peeled off the plenum means nothing.

At the end of the day, the condition looks fairly consistant with the claimed km's (wether true km's or not) and the price is excellent.

The buyer got themselves a very nice car.

I actaully contacted Prestige about this car as I was very interested in it but I was too late....

According to Prestige (Geoff) the kilometers are genuine...."Supplier bought it cheaply from a friend of his who owns the car"

that's true, regardless of the kms it reads, its a really shmick car, and overall in pretty good condition. To date I'm yet to see an R33 GTR that has got a stock plenum without the orginial paint peeling.

The fact the paint has peeled off the plenum means alot I think..

How could an engine with 24k kms on it be in such shabby condition?

Like I said in my 1st post, it does look like a clean unmolested example, but those kms and engine condition dont add up..

Blitz: how many kms did your 33GTR have? Was the plenum like that ?

I admit that I dont have any experience with GTR like you, do all GTR engine look like that after 24k kms ?

'Peeling' of the paint on the intake manifold and cambelt cover looks like corrosion damage, and the alloy turbo pipe with the 'twin turbo' badge looks to have white, powdery aluminium alloy corrosion product on the upper surfaces. Corrosion like that usually occurs on parts that have 'sat around' for while, ie may not have been used very much, which could be consistant with the k's and the condition of the reat of the car. Could be a bargain.

Edit: corrosion damage could also occur if the car was exposed to a saltwater environment, but you'd also begin to see damage on a lot of other components in the enginebay (and even in parts of the body) if that occurred over any length of time, like since 1995 when the car was manufactured

I actaully contacted Prestige about this car as I was very interested in it but I was too late....

According to Prestige (Geoff) the kilometers are genuine...."Supplier bought it cheaply from a friend of his who owns the car"

SO he thought he would pass on the savings to the Aussie customer?

Isnt it their business to make money of selling cheap cars for an inflated price to the Australian domestic market?

Just because a car has less KMS then another, it doesnt mean the car with less kays is better..

SO he thought he would pass on the savings to the Aussie customer?

Isnt it their business to make money of selling cheap cars for an inflated price to the Australian domestic market?

I think you're thinking of some car dealerships, not brokers :D

Brokers make their money from their brokers fee, not by inflating the price. You should pay what they paid for the actual car - whether they source it from an auction or otherwise.

corrosion like that also happens when you wash the engine bay with truck wash and leave the stuff on there too long before rinsing it off....it will also take old paint off....much like that plenum.

'Peeling' of the paint on the intake manifold and cambelt cover looks like corrosion damage, and the alloy turbo pipe with the 'twin turbo' badge looks to have white, powdery aluminium alloy corrosion product on the upper surfaces.  Corrosion like that usually occurs on parts that have 'sat around' for while, ie may not have been used very much, which could be consistant with the k's and the condition of the reat of the car.    Could be a bargain.

Edit: corrosion damage could also occur if the car was exposed to a saltwater environment, but you'd also begin to see damage on a lot of other components in the enginebay (and even in parts of the body) if that occurred over any length of time, like since 1995 when the car was manufactured

Steve is on the money here. I am also going to add to this and say the car may have been driven in a cold climate up in northern parts of Japan. In Japan some prefectures salt the roads in winter and this has a really dramatic effect on cars.

The pictures scream salt damage to me. The underside of the car is probably corroded in places as well.

that's true, regardless of the kms it reads, its a really shmick car, and overall in pretty good condition. To date I'm yet to see an R33 GTR that has got a stock plenum without the orginial paint peeling.

True, this is probably why the R34 GTR plenum is not painted.

My red RB26DETT is not peeling though, im sure they improved the paint in the R34 though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...