Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh yeah :yes: modern Lego is so nice.

I bought a vintage lego train at trash n treasure, $60, expensive? when i got home i looked it up; $500 for a complete one, $3500 in the box. Its missing a couple of common bits which i have. :banana:

That Nissan motor.. i was thinking, its like two moto gp motors, roughly twice the capacity and nearly twice the output.

But it needs a turbo.... if its a high maintenance race engine, its no improvement ( apart from fuel efficiency), just a new size.

If its a reliable street car engine, then its a real winner, as long as its not incredibly expensive.

It would go great in a Lotus or similar..... no, two in a purpose built 600kg racecar! YEEEEAAAAH! :laugh:

Checked out the new IGA Drakeford the other day (because I don't already have about 6 supermarkets within 2 mins of my place lol) and was pretty impressed. It's bigger than I thought, and it's all so new and shiny :D

thanks Shell. Think I'll go there.

I normally do Woolies at Lanyon (easier than Hyperdome for parking close and don't have to put up with shopping mall crowds)

but I'd rather support the smaller traders

thanks Shell. Think I'll go there.

I normally do Woolies at Lanyon (easier than Hyperdome for parking close and don't have to put up with shopping mall crowds)

but I'd rather support the smaller traders

Supabarn near Red Rooter would be nice and close for you too, and an independent trader. I usually shop there - fruit and vegie section is awesome and it's a big shop but you can park at the door.

I like their rewards card too - I have received quite a few $20 vouchers and it's not like I even buy that much (not like shopping for a massive family!) :D

And just for you, there's a bourbon fridge :D

Anyone have 1.5m for a BNR34?

http://www.gt-a.net/fast-furious.html

Paul Walkers R34 GTR is up for sale. $1.5m AUD is a bit high though.

Edited by RosieR34

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...