Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im still having trouble getting my rb20det engine going well.

standard computer

3" exhaust

big front mount

The problem is it runs very well at 10psi, but when i used a bleed valve to make it run 14psi ( standard turbo) it goes hard then cuts (like ignition cut). I pull over and check the self diagnostics and it shows 34, knock sensor. So i wound the base timing right of bit by bit until this does not happen, but by this stage the car is so retarded that it makes far less power than at 10psi.

The strange thing is i cannot hear the knocking at all though this.

Whats wrong?

What can i do to get it running better?

I am getting a rb25 turbo soon so i want to fix this promblem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57601-rb20-wont-run-at-14psi/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my rb25 used to do the same, used to go good on about12-13psi but anymore like 14-15psi and it used to do excatly the same thing as urs, i found that if u progressively put ur foot down once past 4000rpm then it worked fine, but obviously u dont want to drive like that. Its some sort of boost cut, im sure if u ran 12psi then it would be fine and go good then. U can get a fuel cut defender which will rectify the problem but rather save the 200 bucks and put it towards ecu.

Check the plugs are connected properly on the knock sensor.

Check the fuel you are running, NO Premium. Its either a 98RON fuel such as BP Ultimate, Mobil Synergy 8000 or Optimax.

In the past with my RB20t I've had issues with knocking and hesitations when using Mobil Synergy 8000 fuel & running high boost with lots of ignition timing.

So It appears for my RB20t BP 98 has more head room and allows me to lean on it a little harder before detonation sets in.

If its nothing else then its an overactive knock sensor. Hence Dodgy. :(

Why not reset the timing for standard boost, then play with the bleed until it runs well.

I don't think it is ever going to run well at 14psi, but it may run well at 12 psi. And running well at 12 psi is FAR SUPERIOR to running against a brick wall at 14psi.

Thats pretty weird as i ran up to 16psi in my r32 gtst with no problems, no boost cuts or anything.

What you are describing does sound like a cut though.

The error code is not necessarily saying your car is experiencing detonation, rather that you have a dud knock sensor. Try un plugging the sensor and see if you get the same error code. Also remember to reset the ecu once the knock sensors are unplugged as it displays all the old codes if you don't.

I would recommend winding the boost back to 12-13psi as a maximum as the turbo is at the edge of it's efficiency around this point anyway, once you start adding more boost you will definately start to get detonation without some sort of ecu mods

Damn my Skim reading.... I missed the cut part. :(

Mine does that at around 17-18psi.

The RB30DET now does it at 8-9psi. :(

Just to note when I had mine on the dyno, as it nears the cut the fuel afr's really lean out bad. Like 14:1.

14psi sounds very low. Have you tried another AFM?

Sorry buddy.

If its fuel cutting then its not a knock sensor.

I skim read a lot and missed where you said it cuts (a bad habit i've developed due to reading so much for Uni)

Get it on the dyno and check the AFR's before you bother with a fuel cut defender.

The fuel cut is sometimes not directly related to the AFM voltage as with the rb30 the afm voltage hits around 3.5v and will fuel cut at 2500-3000rpm at 8-9psi. Even earlier if you load it up from really low rev's.

A few secs before it fuel cuts it leans out really bad so my guess is either the ecu's stock map has ran out of scope (duty cycle load etc) and freaks out in turn cutting all fuel. Another factory to consider with my motor but not yours is the rising rate fuel pressure reg is now seeing much less boost but expected to supply more more fuel pressure (which obviously doesn't work)

The RB25 head makes more power on 6psi than the rb20det head did on 11psi. So the fuel pressure isn't great enough which possibly causes my lean out.

Or the O2 sensor takes little samples every so often and fuel cuts when the afr hits 14:1 under load as that is where it will always fuel cut.

Not sure its a strange one. :)

well i have a VL commodore uel pump and have a jaycar mixture display and a fuel pressure gauge inside the car. I no the jay car thing isnt that accurate but it shows around 12-13:1 as this cut happens and i cant see the fuel pressure tappering off so........ ?

The thing is that the code 34 only comes up just after this cut happens....?

at what rpm does it do it??? i had one knock senor dissconnected and it hit a wall at about 5 grand. would still go to 7 but just very slowly.

if its the knock sensor it will just retard the timing heaps.

I thought at that sort of boost you usually max out the voltage on the AFM and the stock ecu cuts fuel - basically a method of boost cut.

Mine did it at 0.9bar on cold nights.. denser air means more airflow means more voltage for afm means maxed out afm..

yeah, i might have to drive around with meter on airflow signal. but at the moment its far to wet outside. i have shit tyres so it just wheelspins like mad.

Am i correct in saying the max voltage is 5.1 V ?

Surely this cant be happening as it happens at only 5000rpm. I thought it then happen at 10psi at 7000rpm? same airflow approx?

3LIT3 FORS3,

how can a r32 have a boost cut, it has no map sensor. Cant it only have a airflow cut?

If a coil pack was dodgy, then one cylinder would just miss, not cut. wouldn't it?

When you say 90% of all R32 sylines have error 34 come up, this is bull, that would mean 90 % of all r32s are running like crap. any error code makes the engine run with much less timing and richer fuel. Plus this error code has only been happening since i upped the boost over 11psi.

dwhe009,

When saying a boost cuts its an airflow cut. I.e on the stock turbo this may prove to be 20.5psi.

If Error 34 only occurs since you have upped the boost then it is detonating.

As 3Lit3 ForS3 said it could be a dodgy AFM. I have always suspected mine was dodgy.

In my circumstance it is not the AFM hitting its max voltage (~5.1v) as it will cut any where from 3.5v to 4v. If it were hitting its max voltage then the car would be making 220rwkw or so. Which it most definately does not.

Mine too used to cut earlier on a fresh cold morning. Approx 15-16psi.

It also cuts much earlier if the car is not fully warmed up and pushed hard (rb20t not the new motor :) )

I've just bought my self a bran spankin Z32 AFM for under $300 this with a PowerFC will fix the problem.

In think it could have something to do with the stock ECU's map table, essentially the airflow requirements for that particular load, rpm & TPS has ran off the map.

Causing a lean out then a fuel cut for safety. Possibly?!?

Or maybe your VL Fuel pump is also on its way out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...