Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hiya all,

I have a R33 series1 GTS25 sedan which I have been slowly been working on over the last couple of years.

so far things that have been done,

K & N panel air filter

extractors

2 1/2" exhaust

manual conversion

nasty heavy duty clutch plate (you can't slip this one)

Installed a LSD

Front strut brace

king springs

bilstein shocks

white line rear sway bar

nolathane sway bar bushes

ROH adrenalin alloys (shadow chrome)

Mintex road/race brake pads

GTR rear spoiler, side skirts and end caps

I have a 400R front spoiler too, which I haven't had painted yet.

So the time has come and I have the erge to spend some more money on my baby. I have looked into many different options to try and and gain a few extra kw. I thought after market cams, a fuel pressure regulator and a safc would be the way to go, but found that the standard ecu would be the limiting factor in trying to get any decent sort of gains from the cams, and giving my stock cams a mild regrind wouldn't really yeild any noticable power gains.

So this got me thinking what if I spent my money on a new after market ecu, and use it as a base to work on in the future. After much thought this is the way I have decided to go, so I have ordered a new ecu (R33 GTS Link) which I should arrive in mid January, and hopefully will go into the car in late febuary.

So have any of you guys/gals replaced the ECU in your N/A skyline?

If you have, did it make much difference?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59712-after-market-ecu-on-a-gts25/
Share on other sites

Not to sure how rich the mixtures are on the NA RB25's.

If they are quite rich like most Nissans chances are you should be able to lean them out a bit and pick up some good mid to top end power.

I would imagine the factory timing would already be quite agressive if they were mapped to Jap spec fuel, so probally won't be able to add much more in that area than the factory ecu already has.

You should be able to pick up a little bit here and there though...

Wolf and powerFC plugins work well on n/a cars and with exhaust and pod see around 165rwhp with all standard n/a mods helping this further.

Just with a after market ECU and exhaust/ pod!!?? How much for one of these ecu's and how much to tune steve??

Cheers

Do they require tunes and stuff done to them?? is there anyway i can buy one off someone thats just plug in and go?? how much of a gain can i see??

As far as I know they need to be tuned for the individual car, to get the best out of them. The ECU I'm getting is a plug in sort and will be set up first using a laptop and then fine tuned on the dyno. The guys selling the ECU to me, said that I should gain around 6-10kw with the addition of a tuned ECU on the dyno.

The ECU I'm buying gives me the option of removing the AFM, do you think this would be a good idea? Any one had any experince with a car with the AFM removed?

Yeah I think RB30-power is right in saying the A/F mixtures are rich, I have a A/F ratio gauge installed and it's always reads towards the richer end of the scale.

I've seen good results from ECU's on the RX8's from leaning fuel and advancing timing, this was in the US on some low-octane fuel too.

I can't see why an improvement couldn't be had on the RB25DE as well.

hey guys just some feedback and notes that ive read on the forced induction area

skylines are best suited for closed loop operation and using an air flow meter

theres jack all restriction from the air flow meter and removing it will give you nothing

you can inherit some bullshit problems and bad fuel economy from doing so (removing afm) as you usually use a map sensor instead im pretty sure.

also the cost to fit and tune an aftermarket ecu is a lot compared to gains achieved?

$1100 for power fc, $300 for tune and you get what 10kw extra?

most gtsts with power fc fitted and a shitty $100 bleed valve suck out an extra 30rwkw from ecu and tune much more resonable gains

have you guys considered turbo conversion instead of making the n/a faster

merli covered it once before and it does seem the most "cost effective" approach

just my 2 cents

you know the probably cheapest and best outcome

drive r33 gts25 n/a for 2-3 years or whatever once you are ready and have some cash

do an rb30 bottom end conversion and use a turbo manifold

cheap base car that hasn't been caned

rock solid rb30 bottom end

turbo head with new turbo, ecu, injectors etc

should be a real killer and make massive power

A bit of a gain can be made with the addition of an aftermarket computer with the added bonus of it running cleaner and more efficient. Keep in mind though a heavily modified N/A GTS will still struggle to keep up with even a lightly modified GTSt.

My advice, save the cash and do an RB25DET engine conversion. While more expensive in the short term, it will be far cheaper to extract more power out of it down the road. I did it on my R34 and have not looked back!!

My 2 cents.

Sounds like a plan, anyways, my skyline does me just fine as it is right now anyways... only my first car so i cant really complain... i dont wana have it for ages anyway, at the end of the day, i wana upgrade to an R34 either late 05 or early 06 when i have some driving under my belt, but even still... i want it to be a non turbo for the time being!

I'm fully aware that a lightly modded turbo will out perform a modded N/A. I'm lucky enough to own 2 skylines one a lightly modded turbo R32 GTS-T and the other is my R33 N/A, and yes in a straight line the GTS-T is quicker although at top end the GTS25 holds it's own and there's nothing in it and will slowly pull away from the R32. The truth of he matter is that I perfer the N/A over the turbo, and it's different, not many people choose to work a N/A, and I'm curious to see what sort of results I will be able to get, even though I know it's going to be expensive, and have relatively small gains for the amount of money spent.

As I said in one of my earlier posts I'm buying the ecu as a base to work on for future mods.

I have looked into doing a RB30 bottom end but have decided against it, and stay with the lighter RB25, and see what i can get out of it, One of my friends has put a RB30 bottom end into his car and last dyno he got 130rwkw and over 600Nm of tourque with extractors, pod filter, a 3" exhust system, and mine is currently at 112rwkw and 475Nm of torque.

Thanks for the advice on the AFM I have since done a search and found some info on the subject, and will most definitely keep the AFM.

When the Link ECU goes in I'll post up the results if people are interested.

thanks

Rach

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shouldn't need a "base map" for anything other than guidance to ignition tuning. You just need the engine capacity right, the injector size right, and something, almost anything, for a VE map. On an NA engine, fuelling is almost completely a function of load signal & rpm. It should run and drive with a completely flat fuel map. It will be too lean under load, but that's easily fixed. We used to tune all ECUs without any base map. There were no such things (until someone had tuned a near stock engine on one, and then they had a "base map".
    • What did you actually buy/how much did it cost? When I got mine in like.. 2017...? 2019? the aim was to run Torque for gauges via ODB2 and things like Track Addict/Laptimers/Dashcam/Reversecam/Spotify etc. Mine never broke, but I wonder if you've got the same needs (it sounds like it). Cause I liked the idea of being able to do anything with it. That said, yours also cost 3x the cost of what I spent so... food for thought.  
    • For me there is a massive difference in manufacturer or big brand crippled android (Sony, Kenwood etc) vs the sort of thing I've installed here, which is basically just a tablet in DIN form factor with open Android, and the other model of course is mirroring - Android Auto/Carplay. I hate the locked down manufacturer and AA options where they decide what apps I'm allowed to install, including the Launcher but also importantly things like Ecutek (for this car) or Real Dash (Stagea) are not supported. Plus those crippled versions tend to be slower due to both overheads and lower spec hardware. On the other hand, when this breaks I'll likely be in trouble for support....but how is that different to owning an Infiniti anyway
    • Yeah, Duncan is helping sell me back to Android devices. I've hated the whole Android head units due to their speed issues. Even in my old Hyundai Kona (2022 model), it behind the scenes was Android, and slow and shitty to start up. Once running wasn't bad, but still a good 15 to 30 seconds.
    • My roof rails are off atm on the E39 until the rust is fixed. I did find another little bit of surface rust under the rails when I took them off. As @soviet_merlin said I'd just leave them alone unless you're planning on ensuring they're properly sealed. I was on the fence about leaving them off as the delete is still a thing in BMW E39's but I feel like the car is missing something (er, it is, der) with them off and I'm looking forward to putting them back on.
×
×
  • Create New...