Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you also need a place for the external gate. so youll have to modify the std manifold so may as well go after market. problem is though that the low mount manifolds will point the gate up into the engine bay, so it may be visible...

otherwise you can get the normal 2835 in internal gate version

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1151159
Share on other sites

hmm im pretty sure the 2835 can fit on the standard manifold...

originally I wanted to go 3037s with external gate.....but that definetly wouldnt be low mount.....

so is there a difference in size between the 2835 R and the Pro S ?

i thought the only difference was that one was internal and one was external wastegate ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1151170
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
hmm im pretty sure the 2835 can fit on the standard manifold...

originally I wanted to go 3037s with external gate.....but that definetly wouldnt be low mount.....

so is there a difference in size between the 2835 R and the Pro S ?

i thought the only difference was that one was internal and one was external wastegate ?

The GT2835 Pro-S will bolt straight up to the standard low mount position, and it's got an internal wastegate... The 2835R is slightly different, more suited to a high mount manifold setup. :rofl: The Pro-S is more stealthy.. ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1209578
Share on other sites

Already fitted Gt3040 to Standard manifold, how ever you will have to make a riser plate about 40mm thick in t3 flange pattern to space the turbo away from the engine otherwise the front cover will touch the block. and this will also allow you to tap in a 38mm waste gate line. It was a pretty easy process, but car only made 245 rwkw due to the design of the nissan exhaust manifold.( logger type non tubular.)

Check out GCG range of low Mount manifolds in stainless, as they are good for the money. and come with external gate line.

Cya 33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1210354
Share on other sites

well now i know what your getting...hahaha

good luck .

sausages...

mario you sneaky bastard....you cant use a diff user name on here !!!! :rofl:

hahahaha :P

hmm your tempting me to get something bigger !!! :P

hehe dont worry ill have the turbo on by the time you finished running your engine in :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1216457
Share on other sites

Does the pro S fit standard manifold and standard dump?

bob...yes it does........

Did a little research...the Pro S comes in kit form with literally EVERYTHING you need.....the R doesnt...you just get the turbo and the gasket.

So ill see how much it will cost to get oil lines, return lines, external gate and screamer pipe etc made up/fabricated for the R and compare it to getting the Pro S and go from there....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1216521
Share on other sites

bob...yes it does........

Did a little research...the Pro S comes in kit form with literally EVERYTHING you need.....the R doesnt...you just get the turbo and the gasket.

So ill see how much it will cost to get oil lines, return lines, external gate and screamer pipe etc made up/fabricated for the R and compare it to getting the Pro S and go from there....

im selling a hks 2835. comes with cast hks low mount manifold and trust 40mm external wastegate with screamer pipe. was making 260rwk on my r33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1216542
Share on other sites

hmm thanks for the offer dude :)  

but I wanna buy a NEW turbo....

would you happen to have any pics of it in your engine bay ??

I would like to see how it sits and exactly how low or high it is mounted...

fair enough. Half the price of a new kit though

pics here http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...hlight=hks+2835

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1216595
Share on other sites

I think you'll find the Pro S versions of both the 2835 and 3037 are the only ones with integral wastegate and T3 mount flange . These turbine housings are HKS specials but can be bought separately . These housings have the "GT Pro" outlet whatever that is and may have HKS specific dump pipes .

Cheers Adrian .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1216920
Share on other sites

I think you'll find the Pro S versions of both the 2835 and 3037 are the only ones with integral wastegate and T3 mount flange . These turbine housings are HKS specials but can be bought separately . These housings have the "GT Pro" outlet whatever that is and may have HKS specific dump pipes .  

Cheers Adrian .

Adrian, how can you get one of those HKS housings? I'm interested in either a 0.63 or 0.82 GT3037 version.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60771-turbo-selection/#findComment-1217304
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...