Jump to content
SAU Community

Automatic Transmission Shift Kit. - Updated Oct 2006


Recommended Posts

Why do you want to buy a stock transmission cooler?

I just did the Davies Craig upgrade and have the stock R34 cooler available. I don't know if I want to sell it though, could come in handy somewhere else from what I've been told :D

Just get the DC Cooler, it's well worth your money :D

well, when i went to an auto specialist, he suggested that i could connect my existing standard cooler to a secondary oil cooler. with both combined, it should give me the same (or close to) cooling capacity of an aftermarket replacement cooler.

but whats the DC cooler? havent heard anything about that.....

The DC cooler is the Davies Craig cooler... it's a massive upgrade over the standard cooler, well worth the money in my opinion now :)

If you're after the stock cooler though, PM me your offer :D

  • 1 month later...
just a newbie question...

what do these auto transmission shift kits do?

They reduce the shift time between gears (shift overlap) & in turn with the quicker shifts it also reduces wear.

Any chance of a second group buy or whatever? I'm not goin to go searchin through the thread

You could ring up Mike from MV Automatics & see if he'll still offer you the discounted price as a SAU member.

im getting my valve body assembly modified right now by Mike @ MV Auto.

he's been very easy to deal with, and has been a great help with any of my stupid questions too. but best part is that he's called me to update and discuss whats going on - which is helpful as im in melbourne, and my car is off the road for this week while they modify it for me.

as everyone else has said in this thread, Mike has been great!

  • 6 months later...

Yea me too aswell.

I'm keen on getting one in about a month once I round up enough cash to buy one.

Keep us posted if people are interested on these... maybe someone could start one

I'll give Mike a ring and see what the prices will be.

I will also see what he can do as a group buy on torque converters. (nothing too over the top- just enought for a daily driver yet a bit more stick than stock)

Sorry but I was just wondering what exactly does the torque converter do?

What is the purpose and use of a higher and stronger torque converter?

Will it make it any easier on the gearbox... if so how?

Cheers

Sorry but I was just wondering what exactly does the torque converter do?

What is the purpose and use of a higher and stronger torque converter?

Will it make it any easier on the gearbox... if so how?

Cheers

The torque converter acts as both a clutch (stops the auto stalling when you are stationary) which is designed to lock/stall (or almost lock if you want to be technical) up at a certain RPM. You could consider it as being similar to the manual clutch and easing the pedal out so that the clutch locks up as a certain RPM.

Another benefit of the torque converter is that it also multiplies the amount of torque the engine produces up to the lock point. (and torque wins races, Horse power is for boasting)

A higher RPM torque converter has the benefit of allowing you to have more torque up to the stall point (the curse of high RPM turbo motors has been cured) at the expense of poor fuel economy at any RPM below the stall point.

If you were after a quarter mile rocket you may want to install a torque converter that wouldn’t stall until 5000rpm, which would suit a car with a big turbo and cams that pulled from 5000 - 9000RPM, but if you were to drive the car down the road at 60kmph you wouldn’t be at 5000 RMP, so the torque converter wouldn’t have locked up, and your fuel economy would be awful.

Most people install a much more conservative torque converter that will lock up by 60kmph for a street car - perhaps 2500 - 3000 rpm depending upon the turbos and power curve of the motor.

You will notice the car will rev quickly up to the stall speed, and will have more torque down low, and hence be a lot quicker off the line. With an auto this will also mean your boost will kick in earlier as well.

Hope this helps.

Thanks 4door Sleeper for the information.

So I guess its more to what setup you have on your car.

I only have a VG30 Highflow in my 33 with all the basic mods to support it. I don't think I would need a higher stall converter since my setup is not as extreme. So I guess it would be more useful in a bigger turbo like a GT30 or something.

Guess I will just buy a transmission cooler too keep my transmission alive.

Do you guys think I should upgrade for an auto shift kit?

My goals are only around the 250rwkw mark.

What do you guys think?

Dude you DEFINITELY want an upped stall converter, and the shift kit valve body upgrade - once you have driven an auto with a higher stall, you will never go back.

Basically when you boot it the revs build, but the car doesn't move (much) until the stall takeup point - so basically you can almost never get caught off boost.

However, if you never want to zoom off the lights there probably is no point - but then you wouldn't own a Skyline - you'd be better suited to a Commonwhore :/

But, I am going to wait to save up the full $2,500 to do the stall, shift kit and kevlar plate upgrade to make a 100% bulletproof trans :):D:)

AND, if you're aiming for 250rwkw you WILL need to do this too - I hear the stock trans shits itself at a bit over 200rwkw.

Prices on the shift kit and torque converters have been updated today. Full details are on the first post.

Quick summery:

Valve body is $330 +$55 deposit + postage of between 20 and 30 dollars

Higher speed torque converters of between 2800 and 3000rpm are $410 changeover

The kit consists of a Valve Body for the RE4R01A auto trans, which includes R32's and R33's and some others (Stageas I believe).

Any chance of a kit being offered for the R34 tiptronic in the future?

Any chance of a kit being offered for the R34 tiptronic in the future?

Give Mike a ring at MV automatics, he's a good guy and very helpful.

He may have the 34 valve bodies, I just dont know.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...