Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys , im currently lookin to upgrade from standard T28 to the GT model turbos .

I have spoken to a friend who used to work at a performance place and said that this turbo would be better then runnin a smaller turbo like the GT 25/30 , saying because puttin the engine under to much stress from boosting it up to much with a smaller turbo . (The cars done 140,000kms) . Saying that the boost would come on earlier and still create alot of good power (on standard internals still) , im inclined to think of more wat most ppl have tried already , maybe i havent done enough searchin on this forum for the answer but can someone PLZ help me with, ANY experience with RB20 and GT30/40 setups .

He also said if it lags we can install anti-lag thing on it (like da rally cars have) .. What would u guys do if u were me ...

Im not lookin to crack my lil RB20 to bits , but i know i am lookin to go at least 200rwkw .. Any Turbo selection advice for this would be great THANK! .

Oh and he said its pretty much the same as a to4 . So should i just stick with the smaller turbo like 25/30 ? can it do all that i want without stuffin my engine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63641-gt-3040-on-rb20-help/
Share on other sites

doridori32: :uhh: ???

Bizz,

You could try putting a standard RB25 turbo on as these can get upto 200rwkw's, other wise stay away from the 30/40 if you'r only after 200kw's as its too big and too laggy, I'd surgest standard RB25 turbo or HKS 2530. make sure you have all the other components to able you to get that figure: Fuel pump, inj's, aftermarket ecu, afm's, exhaust, metal head gasket etc.

Anti-lag = NOS - You wont need nos if you'r running a GT2530 :)

It's all possible with out dammaging you'r engine but you'll need to have a propper look at the internal's other wise as soon as you crank some boost through it the piston's will be rat sh!t being, 140,000k's old. - This also depends on how the car was driven previously.

:D

Jun

Thank u all (only 2) for ur comments i appreciate it. I was thinkin Exactly that , the GT30/40 would be a lil big for rb20 , however i been reading on http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/cat...ategory12_1.htm that the 30/40 IS suited for a RB20 , but wat cost? :) I guess wat u are telling me is that GO THE GT 25/30? or GT25/35 even better? Will it put to much load on the car ? or am i being realistic about this turbo (gt25/30) being rated AT 320HP which is fine , but he was sayin why stop there if u would be movin UP in future in power get it NOW instead of buy it later and be stuck wif a smaller turbo ..

Would it just make more sence to get a GT28 or just keep my original one and HIGH FLO it ?

I will get the engine looked @ when i get the head ripped off and stuff. Thanks for ur info guys . Im more inclined to beleive ppl here that have TRYED and PAID for their conversions then beleive a SALES man trying to SELL me a big ass turbo for a lil ass 2.0L .

I just want to get it right NOW. and not wish i chose something BIGGER or BETTER

Get yourself a a big compressor cover with a big wheel , and leave the rear standard  it will be a good upgrade for 200rwkw on low boost

So ur saying Keep standard Turbo ? and change the internals ? ive herd ppl have some issues with that . But i have at least 2G to spend on a turbo alone cheers .. Oh ANY1 Selling one gimme a PM :D

Pick a power figure before you go picking turbos.

Also consider, your engine, and support systems will need to be upgraded according to the desired power level.

My opinion, a GT3040 is way too big for a RB20 unless it has had considerable investment in terms of engine modifications.

Build ur own ? how da f :D .... i think u talkin bout da GT 25/35 ya ? i think thats a goer ... does any 1 have a link to prices and once again thanks heaps ... I want to get my hands on a Apexi PFC , are they hard to get ? they bout 1500 ya

GT2530 is fine. Garett. HKS if fine but you'll need 2nd hand for your budget. T3 flange remember.

PowerFC for a RB20 with hand controller, budget $1650. Its a special edition AP package.

Find someone to retune the ROM.

Get a Brand new Garret GT25..... run 1k boost, and get her tuned!

bang 200rwkw you have.

cool. its done . ill order one on monday . Then get it all installed and dynod up and ill let u all know how i went Thanks heaps for ur comments ... I knew the 30/40 was to big , i aint lookin for a full drag car . Just a nice street car that can be taken out if i wanted and boost it up for some action ... Cheers all and safe driving :(

hmmmz ... well i got da extra $$ and if i dont do it now and im sure it will be one day ... Wat are the benifits wif retuning the standard ECU ? wat besides visual readouts do u get from a New ECU . i dont mind either one but i still would prefer to save the money as i aint totally dumb. If any1 got retuned ECU lemme know wat u gettin out at rear :(

hehe oh and go hard Morgs

Here is a post I made several times, most of it is applicable. If you want to know more, do a search, all the info you will need is there.

1. We use a ball bearing hi flowed RB25DET turbo on our old RB20DET for 220 rwkw (295 rwhp or 370 bhp) at 1.3 bar. This turbo holds more than 1.1 bar of boost from 4,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm, so it is never off boost on gear changes. We have found this is the most airflow (max power) we can get and keep the rpm range useable. We have a few more mods than you have listed, split dump, 3.5 inch exhaust, no cat (it's a race car), GTR cams, adjustable pulleys, Power FC with boost controller, POD filter, heat shield and a substantial ambient air feed. The exhaust manifold was a copy of the R31 GTRS Group A manifold which has the turbo mounted low and rear for better weight distribution. As usual GCG did this hi flow. Oh and the engine was standard internally, never even had the head off.

The other alternative is to go the Garrett route as you said, but I would suggest a GT25R with this spec;

0.86 A/R Turbine Housing

0.70 A/R Compressor Housing

Watercooled Core

48 Trim Compressor Wheel

76 Trim Turbine Wheel

Internal Wastegate

This turbo will flow 48 lbs/min max, which is easily enough for 420 bhp. But it ain't gunna make much boost at 4,000 rpm, more like 5,000 rpm. And it's gunna need cams, pulleys and a good split dump/exhaust system to make even that. So you are gunna have to rev it to 8,000 rpm before you upchange, otherwise it's gunna drop off the power band severely. You will need at least 1.6 bar and maybe as much as 1.9 bar to make your power target. Add these together (1.9 bar + 8,000 rpm) and you have a short life for your internally standard RB20DET that already has 100,000 k's on it.

End of that post, but there are plenty more around if you do a search:cheers:

PS; Did I mention doing a search?

Here is a post I made several times, most of it is applicable.  If you want to know more, do a search, all the info you will need is there.

The other alternative is to go the Garrett route as you said, but I would suggest a GT25R with this spec;

0.86 A/R Turbine Housing

0.70 A/R Compressor Housing  

Watercooled Core  

48 Trim Compressor Wheel  

76 Trim Turbine Wheel  

Internal Wastegate

This turbo will flow 48 lbs/min max, which is easily enough for 420 bhp.  But it ain't gunna make much boost at 4,000 rpm, more like 5,000 rpm.  And it's gunna need cams, pulleys and a good split dump/exhaust system to make even that.   So you are gunna have to rev it to 8,000 rpm before you upchange, otherwise it's gunna drop off the power band severely.  You will need at least 1.6 bar and maybe as much as 1.9 bar to make your power target.  Add these together (1.9 bar + 8,000 rpm) and you have a short life for your internally standard RB20DET that already has 100,000 k's on it.

End of that post, but there are plenty more around if you do a search:cheers:

PS; Did I mention doing a search?

SK,

the Garrett GT25R u mention above is a mismatched turbo that requires high boost as to provide the required air-flow to make ~400hp, with the addition of plenty of lag given the larger (dinosaur age technology) 48 trim T04S compressor wheel which is more suited with the 84 trim GT30 turbine wheel as to work more efficiently.

Our friend would would be much better off with a turbo which houses a smaller compressor wheel with the same turbine wheel to provide a better balance b/w boost build up and air-flow.

given this and the requirements of the car, i recommend the 350 or 400hp GT25 (446179-0031 or 446179-0032) which use the GT35 compressor wheels.

these are much more efficient turbos which can provide the required ~200rwkw or more at 1.3 bar.

for a real life example, a friend used the larger of thes turbos (56 trim compressor wheel and A/R .64 turbine housing) and managed to produce 222rwkw on 1.3bar from an internally standard RB20DET with a larger FMIC, Unichip, Bosch 040 fuel pump, K&N air filter and malpassi fuel reg.

the car was quite responsive and nice to drive also.

Our friend would would be much better off with a turbo which houses a smaller compressor wheel with the same turbine wheel to provide a better balance b/w boost build up and air-flow.

given this and the requirements of the car, i recommend the 350 or 400hp GT25 (446179-0031 or 446179-0032) which use the GT35 compressor wheels.

So ? get a GT25/30 or GT25/35? then change the compressor wheel and turbine wheel on that ? ... me gettin confused now :( ... Im sure the GT25/30 will be fine ( remember i am doin everything BUT injectors )

interesting discussion

what does the compressor map look like on one of them "GT25 (446179-0031 or 446179-0032) which use the GT35 compressor wheels."

sounds bout what i'm aiming for..

Matt

this is what i was able to find;

http://www.atpturbo.com/root/maps/gt3071r.htm

well, hks gt-2530 (GT25) is a fairly common replacement for an RB20DET, that's what i'd go (daym, there was a turbo & piping kit for an rb20det on sale on yahoo japan a while ago that sold pretty cheap)

it would probably be best to avoid ceramic turbo's altogether, they tend to crap themselves over about 1.0 bar. Don't know about a high-flowed one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...