Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you will need the corresponding boost kit loom to suit your car powerfc. the r33 gtst use the 3 pin kit, so you will need to buy this seperately. nengun.com has it. you really should reset it to defaults and get it tuned, it could be risky using someone else's tune, not too mention more work fixing the tune rather than starting again

Hey guys,

Great thread!

I have a question.

On the old Nissan ECU, starting the engine was no problem at all. Sounded like 2 cranks and she lit up every time.

With the Power FC after, a full tune by the Hitman and the 30 min warm up idle setting, it takes about 8-10 cranks to start.

It starts every time, don't get me wrong.

Just thought it strange the standard Nissan did it better than the Power FC

Any settings i could be looking at?

Thanks

Birnie

you need to lower the injector latency for cranking under SETTING

he was having issues with warm start. i too experienced this issue and i think cubes did as well at once stage. he and i lowered the latency under CRANKING for warm water temp. this seemed to fix it.

obviously you think differently? how would u fix it?

he was having issues with warm start. i too experienced this issue and i think cubes did as well at once stage. he and i lowered the latency under CRANKING for warm water temp. this seemed to fix it.

obviously you think differently? how would u fix it?

I would change the cranking pulse width vs coolant temp - I think it is what you are refering too. Dont think there is such thing as injector latency for crank vs coolant unless you are privy to APEXI software even then I dont think it would exist as I have never found this within a standard ECU and it doesn't make sense. Injector latency doesn't change w.r.t coolant temp on a scale large enough to account for, even for a 32bit floating point system which it is not. It does however change w.r.t battery voltage just as dwell and other vairables do.

Sorry to sound patronising - just tryin to inform.

Edited by rob82
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys....

I just got the boost controller kit for the apexi and went to install it but came to the solenoid cable and got a little stuck.....

Plugs in fine on the solenoid end but when it comes to the other end dont have much of an idea.. it doesnt fit the original plug and not sure what to do.

Do I have the wrong wire?

here is a pic of the wire.

Oh car is R33 GTST

post-11444-1155982857.jpg

Edited by bygrave316

It's come to my attetion that some people are copying the powerfc faq and using it on their own site/forums. whilst i dont mind you using it, i would prefer a hotlink to my site instead of the text itself. That way when its updated you point to the updated one.

http://www.google.com.au/search?q=GTS25TML...r=&filter=0

geez, great faq. i know how hard it is to write one of these! mega well done.

only note, how are you specifying width for your paragraph tables? i'm finding the text goes over the edge of the screen in firefox (19" screen at 1024x768).

Edited by sigsputnik

Hi,

I use a Power FC D-Jetro and have just installed Nismo 600cc injectors. I am now getting black smoke out the rear and the engine is idling a little rough.

Just wondering if I can correct this with a little adjustment in the PFC settings?

Cheers :)

EDIT: ok correction, my car is running like absolute shit. Its shanking all over the place, which means to me that I have rooted the AFR majorly :)

***HELP PLEASE :nuke:

EDIT2: ok, found the 'How do I confingure larger injectors?' section. Will give it a go now (coincidently, std RB26er's to 600ccer's :) ).

EDIT3: No Good! :(, just changed the Injector settings to 74% and +0.04ms, still need help.

if its still pouring out black smoke then its too rich

which would indicate incorrect injector settings

or you are calculating it wrong. have you double checked latency and correction?

or you are calculating it wrong. have you double checked latency and correction?

Under Settings > Injectors, I have all 6 set at 74% (default 100%) and +0.04 (defualt 0.00)

Thats all I have changed, is this right?

  • 2 weeks later...

Updated:

expanded on hand controller lockup on apexi logo notes

added poor mans antilag

added boot up diagnostics easter egg

added Can I have a lumpy 'cammed' idle?

  • 1 month later...

fixed spelling errors

changed logo

expanded on supported models list

expanded on australian version "model"

cleaned up the headings

added complete optional parts list

added autospeed ariticle

added line spacing and HR rules

added build your own AVCR boost kit under "How does the AVC-R compare to the PowerFC boost controller kit?"

added installation checklist

added powerfc roadmap for menu options

added changelog shortcut

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...