Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Paul,

Got a question that I'm hoping you'll be able to answer for me. Would late model R33 GTS-T's (post sep 97, early 98) use exactly the same PowerFC as the earlier model R33 GTS-T's?

My reason for this question is related to the change in CAS on the late model 33's. I've basically got a set of "series 2" Tomei Poncams with an R34 CAS to match. I'm now wondering if this CAS will work with the ECR33 PowerFC that I soon plan to install.

If all PowerFC's for the ECR33 were the same then in theory it should work as the post sep97 r33's came out with the different (r34 style) CAS. *fingers crossed*

Thanks!

P.S. I have called a couple of tuners and they're not sure either.

hi damuscat,

The R33 uses the same model PFC wether the car is 1993 or 1998 R33 (inclusive).

They all use and run the same stock ecu (map changes however) but its the same control unit.

The 98 R33 that uses the R34 CAS runs the same logic and controls so its fine with a normal R33 PFC.

I know of a 1998 R33 in melbourne that runs a normal R33 PowerFC fine with no issues.

hi damuscat,

The R33 uses the same model PFC wether the car is 1993 or 1998 R33 (inclusive).

They all use and run the same stock ecu (map changes however) but its the same control unit.

The 98 R33 that uses the R34 CAS runs the same logic and controls so its fine with a normal R33 PFC.

I know of a 1998 R33 in melbourne that runs a normal R33 PowerFC fine with no issues.

Awesome! That'll save me a lot of trouble. Thanks for the lightning quick response too! :(

  • 3 weeks later...

Updated today

added rx7 injectors to injector change table

corrected a version mismatch which brought back the old incorrect injector change calculation text ( but the math was correct )

  • 2 weeks later...

Just purchased a PFC With a tune on it already.

I tried playing around with it but made my car worst than it was already.

I know it needs a prof tune but i want to attempt to make it work first.

Fuel is my main issue at the moment. I played around with Accel. Inj Time. No idea what it was. Whatever it did, the car doesn't even idle properly anymore. It just goes up and down on the rev gauge but staying under 1000. It wants to cut off but doesn't.

Also, it wont go any higher than 3000rpm. but on the way up there it just rumbles and doesn't do it very smoothly.

Before i mucked it up the revs climbed smoothly but once i let it go and it went under 1000rpm and would sink and almost turn off but would steady itself in a few more seconds.

Any ideas what section i should look at?

Pitty there is no english version of the manual.

Thanks in advance.

At 1st glance, sounds like you've selected the wrong AFM.

Check that setting first...assuming you know which AFM you do have,

Also, if you don't understand what the injection timing is for, stop what you are doing right now ! Seriously.

Best would be to reset all the settings and go and get it tuned.

Resetting it will make it more than drivable as long as you take into account and basic mods like injectors or AFM's etc.

Just purchased a PFC With a tune on it already.

I tried playing around with it but made my car worst than it was already.

I know it needs a prof tune but i want to attempt to make it work first.

Fuel is my main issue at the moment. I played around with Accel. Inj Time. No idea what it was. Whatever it did, the car doesn't even idle properly anymore. It just goes up and down on the rev gauge but staying under 1000. It wants to cut off but doesn't.

Also, it wont go any higher than 3000rpm. but on the way up there it just rumbles and doesn't do it very smoothly.

Before i mucked it up the revs climbed smoothly but once i let it go and it went under 1000rpm and would sink and almost turn off but would steady itself in a few more seconds.

Any ideas what section i should look at?

Pitty there is no english version of the manual.

Thanks in advance.

hi,

what are you trying to achieve?

have you juts got and installed the powerfc?

ok ive just re-read it, using someone else's tune is a bad idea and great way to kill your engine

its not idling properly as the tune is from someone else's car

the first thing you should do is follow the correct install procedure (in the faq) and reset the powerfc

the tune on it is useless and you should start from scratch. this will make it idle correctly then you can get it tuned

Hey Guys!

I have an Apexi Power FC in my Gizza. (sorry not a skidline)

I always have a knock of 1 on idle, but may max know under full acceleration is usually below 10.

Max knock i ever had was 64, when a did a super shit gear change :)

I just wondering what sort of figures your Hand controllers give you?

THanks ,

Mike

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys i need some help i have a POWER FC for my evo 6

and i also ordered the WRONG boost controler kit for it

now is it posible to re wire this controler to work with the power fc? like just the end plug?

or will i have to swap it with some one?

Hi Paul, a similar question to the above:

A friend has the Power FC boost controller kit for the R32 GTR. I have a GTST R33. Will I be able to use his kit with my PFC?

this will depend on the # of pins on the socket and your powerfc

both should have the 5 pin kit but check (there is also the 3 pin kit)

the socket next to the hand controller port is either 5 or 3 pin

check what yours has (should be 3) then check what he has (should be 3 also)

if they are both the same (either 3 or 5 pin) then its fine and direct fit

Just installed the PFC this morning but i had problems during the initial stages when i first start up my car. Based on FAQ, i let it idle the 1st 10 mins without any problems then when i switch on the Aircon, the engine started to hunt up & down non stop. I check the sensors to see what was wrong but no problem indicators was shown. When the aircon was switch off, the idling was perfectly normal. I tried to initialize it then doing the same routine few times but still have rev hunting with a/c on. The engine felt like the a/c is cutting in/out continuously.

Then i realize that previously my mechanic told me about my idling valve needs changing because the screw to adjust cannot be turn due to the plastic gone all flat. I change it immediately (2nd hand) and Voila! it runs like a dream now. No hunting whatsoever. Did a 15 mins idle then then turn the A/C on and took it for a blast. Currently happy with the base map and will do a proper tune once i get the Datalogit software.

Hope this would help those who has problems during installation time.

Edited by driftmeister
why do you mean it's in power fc? do i need to go to rx7 forum? or there is a tread in here for special tricks?

sorry i mean its in the powerfc

as in the screen part # and how to do it

have a look

(url is in this thread first page or my signature)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...