Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 7 months later...
Your Engine warning light will also flash in a particular sequence when your AFM maxes out. This is often mistaken for knock... I am not sure what the 2 different sequences for knock and AFM Max out are though...

are u sure about this??

coz ive neva seen this, but im still runnin a stock comp.

i believe pfc can b setup to do this..but i think it does it for knock as standard..

other than that..

yeah, it feels like ur car can go alot harder..but it cant.

feels like u've hit a wall..

also, ive been told by tuners that the ecu has stock maps that maxs out evan before the afm reaches max...but im unsure about this..

and u cant run a z32 afm on a stock ecu anyways..

ive got an apexi neo and it displays my afm %, thats another way u can see ur afm %.

bring on a map sensor :pirate:

Hey guys interesting thread. Just wanna ask, is it time for a new afm?

I have a standard rb25 afm (pink label) and got a hi flowed turbo.

I made 215kw on 10.5 psi on a stock ecu. Dont really wanna go much further but would like to do a run at higher boost before putting it back to 12psi.

Will my afm crap itself soon? Should i go with a z32 just in case?..

cheers guys

Yes, it is true, you need a remap

Oh really?, i just thought i could just put one on.

cheers for that tho,, but do you think at the power level i'm making now, I would need to upgrade?

I am happy to keep it where it is

Oh really?, i just thought i could just put one on.

cheers for that tho,, but do you think at the power level i'm making now, I would need to upgrade?

I am happy to keep it where it is

no, basically it is like measuring up a hole in the wall to have a window made and having someone call out measurement in cm, and then changing the person giving the measurements and having them measuring in inches but not telling you, so you think when he says 5 he means 5cm, not 5 inches which is 12.7cm. you are going to end up with the wrong thing.

as for how much power, you can generally get to about 250kw when they are getting close to maxing out. the people who said they were having it max out at under 200kw are incorrect. that would be the ecu packing up it's bat and ball and going home. it is called rich and retard and it is a safeguard in the ecu. it doesn't mean the afm is maxing out, just means the ecu doesn't like the amount of air going in at that load point in the map so it cuts out. i had this happen in my 33 when i wound the boost up.

You can tune past the AFM - its just not recommended for joe-average type people who don't check things regularly, sensors, warnings and so on.

Better to have the AFM to suit your application.

exactly. it is a little bit of a "hope for the best" type of situation as you are putting in the amount of fuel that it needs at the time of the tune, but if conditions alter a bit it can end up being not enough fuel (or too much)

was done by a very good tuner over here. i have had my car on this dyno over 30 times now and matches very well to other dynos around perth (dyno comps). my guess would be that it it is at the limit now, i asked him if i needed a Z32 but he said no, he can tune it with the stock one. the engine happy revs, minimal knock (everytime i look it about 10 to 20 peak) and no warning lights

Edited by Pal

i just wanna clear things up for myself...

PPl keep putting RWKW as a guide to when the AFM is maxing out... would this really have anything to do with it... what happens if you have made good power from mods such as cams exhaust FMIC etcc..this dosnt effect the AMF does it... so is it raelly only the psi your running a better guide to testing when it will ma

No - You need a certain amount of air to make "X" power... its not boost related. The AFM does not care if your running 10psi or 100psi.

What it cares about as follows - Max of the AFM is say, 200rwkw and you need 100CFM to make that power.

Large turbo 10psi = 100CFM

Tiny turbo 100psi = 100CFM

So its predominately rwkw driven based upon this.

Yes i realise the above example is rather ridiculous and ive probably got it slightly wrong - but it's all i can think of atm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...