Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We are in process of getting bakelite inlet gaskets for RB20/25 and 26. This material prevents heat transfer from heads to inlet plenum. For RB26 added bonus of replacing the factory paper throttle body and inlet plenum gasket which are notorious for blowing out and getting air leaks. Up to now only option is after market gasket such as expensive Tomei metal ones which work fine but still transfer heat.

We have had the gaskets scanned and ready to make and will have in next week or so. We have already had made for VG30 300ZX. This is not a new invention as they are available on E Bay a while back for many engines in USA but not Skylines so we decided to do it. They will not be much more than factory ones depending on volume but way cheaper and better than Japanese aftermarket ones. 2 birds one rock deal.

Wondering what the interest would be. Remember average of 7 degrees increase or reduction in temp means 1% plus or minus in power.

PS If you have stock inlet gaskets and boost your GTR which is most then only a matter of time. Also never put strong solvent cleaners down throttle bodies as it can disolve the factory grey rubber type throttle body sealant and cause an air leak and idle will remain way too high.

Pic is of my VG30 DETT.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68034-bakelite-inlet-gaskets/
Share on other sites

There's an old (over 5 years) Autospeed article about these:

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0401/article.html

And i started a rather short-lived thread about it:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=56688

I'd be certainly interested to see how these perform when tested independantly.

bakelite hey? How does this stuff go in compression - is it going to deform, crack or deteorate over time being squashed between the head and the inlet manifold.

What sort of temperatures can it cope with.

What are the thermal properties - ie heat transfer rate through the material, (W/Deg_C/m)

It has been used for this purposeas wel as many other applications for years. I am not aware of any probs only benefits. A hole lot better than aper ones the GTR's have from factory.

The only question I have is that the inlet manifolds already have coolant water passages in them so the the heat will come from the coolant rather than the head casting . I'm always in favour of good gaskets that seal well , but the heat insulation would probably work better on non water heated manifolds such as the RB26's plenum section . My theory only , I'd reckon at high flow rates (revs/boost) the inlet air dosen't spend enough time in the manifold section to absorb much heat . I also think its desirable to have some heat in the inlet charge at idle and low engine speeds for fuel vaporisation meaning clean emissions and good fuel consumption .

Cheers A .

Yes and we found this on VG30 also. We also remove the throttle body heating on zeds for same reason. You could drill and tap and run external these water galleries although have not had a close look at it on RB26. It is accumulative if getting heated by coolant and combustion heat, removing or limiting one will help. Correct air would not spend much time passing through although at low speed road driving probably make more of a difference. Main point being it would help and better than factory gaskets which is a prob and way cheaper than Tomei or other gaskets.

There is no benefit in heating the inlet charge unless you live in VERY cold climate and much more benefit in cooling or rather avoiding heating.

They will prob be around $50 each at most. Prob is I have to get at least a hundred made and adds up to thousands and will take a long time to sell a hundred or more to need to get some funds back.

being in the electricity industry I see allot of Bakelite products and when it is fairly thin, as it would need to be with a gasket, it would be fairly fragile and as with a paper gasket with some age it becomes brittle. wouldn't the ambient temperature of the engine bay sort of rule out trying to stop heat transfer by using the gasket to stop metal to metal contact. in a GTR the first intake manifold has a gallery fed from the the head in it which feeds both cooloant supplies for the turbo's, one around the front of the motor and one around the back. The throttle bodies and intake plenum don't have any water galleries in them. but your not wrong about the gasket blowing out between the head and the first intake manifold, my 33 did it straight away and i just spent a day replacing the one on my wifes 32.

Will advise when available and should be in next few weeks. Re temps the thing that makes the heat is the engine and turbo and this is what we are helping shield against. The heads are hotter than under bonnet temps.

  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...