Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought to make a post here as we have been receiving LOTS of calls and emails about our over due intake plenums. Plasma man Racing is making them exclusive for us. He makes the most beautiful and functional intercoolers, plenums etc in Australia. He has had a delay as had to make a huge press to make the top pieces, but should not be too far away now as he just finished making this press last weekend. 47 are being made.

We have been doing extensive flow bench testing at Abrasive Flow Engineering in Sydney and found at no surprise the factory RB20/25 intake plenum is not very good as the middle two runners that the throttle body shoot at get way more air than the outside ones. So if you are tuning the middle runners need much more fuel.

The plenums we are getting made has already been tested on a car with a prototype and made more power than any other RB25 SI or SII, and the test car was a I with stock dump and engine pipe and stock computer so even more impressive at 208rwkw.

Three reasons.

1. Less pressure drop.

2. Lower intake temps.

3. More even air flow to each cylinder.

This is from using QUALITY USA core, that is if getting the full kit, with smooth tapered end tanks and pipe work. Less bends and less pipe work being heated by radiator and engine.

Less pressure drop as less pipe and less bends. 1/4 psi or more with each 90 degree bend.

Far more even air flow to each cylinder from better design plenum, including machined trumpets inlets. I can't remember the thickness but think the main bottom plate is 12mm.

Also we have found Greddy plenums to be very coarse inside and too big especially the runners and on dyno actually lost power. This has been confirmed with other workshops. Where ours definitely makes power. Free power as less stress on motor.

Yes they bolt straight up with factory throttle or can use larger throttle body, factory throttle cable and fuel rail ready to go. When released they will be around $1500 each for plenums.

Pic of progress.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68046-uas-rb2025-intake-plenum/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top only yes. We have tooled up to extrude hone the lower runners also althugh test car did not have this. To have the ultimate you would do this and match port also as stock they are not the best. Ryno no firm price on full kit yet. There will be the normal 10% SAU discount or maybe more.

I was going to let this slide, as any contradictory post may come across as being simply argumentative, and that is certainly not my intention. But it is so totally contrary to what I have experienced, I just have to ask for some more details.

We have been doing extensive flow bench testing at Abrasive Flow Engineering in Sydney and found at no surprise the factory RB20/25 intake plenum is not very good as the middle two runners that the throttle body shoot at get way more air than the outside ones.  So if you are tuning the middle runners need much more fuel.

I have tested the RB20/25 uneven airflow theory a couple of times, and found it to be a myth. My methodology has been to test the A/F ratios at the primary exhaust pipes, which I believe is the BEST measure of inequalities in airflow under boost. Any cylinders with higher airflow would show leanness when compared to other cylinders with lower airflow. I simply have not seen that, in fact the only cylinder that shows any leanness is #6 and (as slight as it is) that can be more likely attributed to water temp differences as it is the furthest from the water pump.

Testing on the flow bench can easily be flawed as it relies on vacuum to stimulate airflow, this does not necessarily generate the same airflow patterns as when boost is introduced into the equation ie, suck versus blow.

The question is then, how were the tests carried out? And how was the extrapolation to boost conditions calculated?

Less pressure drop as less pipe and less bends.  1/4 psi or more with each 90 degree bend.

This one is even more difficult for me to understand. If this were in fact the case, then in an RB25DET with the usual 6 X 90 degree bends, you would see a 1.5 psi difference in the boost pressure at the intercooler outlet tank compared to what you see at the throttle body. Having tested this many, many times, when selecting intercoolers, I have yet to see even 0.25 psi pressure drop.

Testing this on the flow bench can easily be flawed, as once again it relies on vacuum to stimulate airflow, this does not necessarily generate the same pressure drop as when boost is introduced into the equation.

So the same questions apply, how were the tests carried out? And how was the extrapolation to boost conditions calculated?

I expect that John may not able to answer the questions himself, but I am sure the testers will be able to fill in the gaps.

:P

This will be in interesting discussion as I know SK's view on front facing plenums versus factory.

Those plenums look very nice john - any pics of from the TB perspective ?? Just intested in seeing how the flow works.

Yes Sydney kid flow bench test is not conclusive but with common sense, theory and above all dyno test to back it all up hard to argue with dyno test. Also checked the thickness of the base and they are actually 16mm. We do lots of flow bench testing on our zed, testing different ports in heads and valves, and valve grinds, even found RB26 brass valve guides being shorter than the VG30 ones so less protruding into the port and proved a gain in cfm on flow bench test. Re the pressure drop with bends this is very general and can be more or less. We can talk and theorize back and forth and good to get input but the bottom line is OUR dyno tests prove it. We have never had a Skyline make this power even with addition of full exhaust and after market computer tuned. Keep in mind we have had hundreds on our dyno.

Also re the pic of 25 yes but this is not all of them and good counting.

Also we have found Greddy plenums to be very coarse inside and too big especially the runners and on dyno actually lost power.  This has been confirmed with other workshops.  Where ours definitely makes power. Free power as less stress on motor.

Pic of progress.

I'm interested in that comment in particular.

Greddy being the company they are, Provide lots of aftermarket products, and carry out lots of testing. If their product wasn’t up to standard would the Japanese market use them?

The plenum in particular, is very coarse inside, and the runners may be big yes thats true.

But it depends on the applications its used for, Eg. If you were running a Gt35/40 with around 28psi boost level, which people do, running on an Rb25, with a ported head and a large set of cams. Would you want a plenum that has restrictive runners or a plenum that has a larger cfm capacity and larger runner capacity, increase Volumetric Efficiency in the head.

The USA Plenums are a good setup and look nice, But how well do they perform

on a heavily modified motor? As compared to a stock motor?

:P

Yes Sydney kid flow bench test is not conclusive

Same result as we get, inconclusive results. The flow bench is simply not a good test in this instance

but with common sense, theory

Again I applied common sense and logic and I can not see how a plenum with the inlet at one end is going to be any better, in regard to evenness of flow, compared to one that feeds the plenum in the centre. To me that is illogical.

above all dyno test to back it all up hard to argue with dyno test

I will argue with a peak power number all day, every day, heavens it might have lost 50 rwkw everywhere else. Sorry but "208rwkw" tells me nothing about how well the plenum works.

We can talk and theorize back and forth and good to get input but the bottom line is OUR dyno tests prove it.  We have never had a Skyline make this power even with addition of full exhaust and after market computer tuned.

The control test here would to put the car on the dyno and tune it the best that can be achieved. Then swap the plenum and without changing ANYTHING else show that it makes more horsepower. Personally I would be looking for an average power increase, not just a peak number at one rpm point.

I have done this exact test with an RB26 plenum on an RB20, dismal failure, less power in most places than standard. I have done this test with a Greddy plenum on an RB25, partial success it gained power at some rpm points but lost them at others. I have done this test with a Greddy plenum on an SR20, absolute disaster, it lost power EVERYWHERE.

Hence my scepticism; :D

i like the design, although maybe u should include an option for shorter intercooler piping, gtr style.

plenums like this do make alot of difference. me and my mate tested the difference between our cars, both stock rb25's, mine had custom plenum, same size turbo. mine would kick in at 2200 and hit 1 bar by 3500 and his would kick in at around 3500 and hit 1 bar by 4500 rpm. although his was running stock computer with a safc and i was running a microtech LT-16s, im sure that tuning didnt make that much of a difference.

keep up the good work John :D

We will have them flow bench tested as have figures for the stock ones to compare. They will obviously flow better with stock or large turbo compared to stock one but may or may not be as good if you have a turbo you need a pole volt to jump over. I suspect they would be better than Greddy even with big flow turbo. If you got the Greddy extrusion honed may be a different story.

Also if you think that everything made in Japan is top stuff or best then you believe in stickers as not always the case although generally true. Come around to UAS one day and I show and tell and I am sure you will agree. We have lots of items made for us here in Australia way better than anything in Japan. E.g. our upper rear control arms made out of lighter and stronger Chrome Molly tube, tig welded with much better quality rod end and billet alloy spacers instead of heavy cheap mild steel ones. Weight 937 grams compared to 1498 grams Cusco brand. Unsprung weight, big advantage.

No tests on R32 but again common sense applies if makes more on R33.

G'day hows it goin?

Even if the custom plenum doesnt give gains in horsepower which is debatable there would still be sustantial gains in throttle response in the form of reduced throttle lag am I correct. And wouldnt the shorter pipes improve inlet temps thus horsepower?

Looks like an awesome unit John and I know Plasmaman fabricate some excellent stuff. If I had the cash Id put one on my line for sure...........maybe sometime in the future.

Cheers

Michael

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...