Jump to content
SAU Community

Catch Cans - Again


Recommended Posts

i hate to bring up an old thread, especially one that already has SOO much info in it. i just cant be 100% sure im doing the right thing. and wouldnt want to go ahead without checking :D

post-22805-1161231543.jpg

is that ok to do on an RB20 ?

nothing blocked off, just taking out line that was there and plumbing it through the can ?

Edited by thrtytwo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Think about what and where the oil is going... you would be catching the crossover between the breathers... so it would be 50% or a standard setup. I won't say it won't work... it might, I just don't think it would really be much use (especialy for the time, effort and money put in)

block off the ecv, and put the catch can on the other side (leave it plumbed to the I/C). 100% legal, better idling...

Of course, I have yet to do this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about what and where the oil is going... you would be catching the crossover between the breathers... so it would be 50% or a standard setup. I won't say it won't work... it might, I just don't think it would really be much use (especialy for the time, effort and money put in)

block off the ecv, and put the catch can on the other side (leave it plumbed to the I/C). 100% legal, better idling...

Of course, I have yet to do this...

to be honets i dont know what any of the pipes are, this was just the idea i got from what ppl were saying :D and a few pics of RB25s

hate to be a painb, rekon you could whip up a diagram in paint or summin :) ?

pwetty pweese *pouts*

Edited by thrtytwo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

I am going to put on a 100% atmo catch can and have the filter installed remotely somewhere hidden with extra piping...will this still work?

Also from my sig you can see the pipe connecting the 2 PCV's is altered with an exit hose between them which at present just goes to the firewall and does nothing. Can I replace this pipe with one connected to the catch can? and not have it connected directly to the LHS PCV?

Cheers,

JB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Think about what and where the oil is going... you would be catching the crossover between the breathers... so it would be 50% or a standard setup. I won't say it won't work... it might, I just don't think it would really be much use (especialy for the time, effort and money put in)

block off the ecv, and put the catch can on the other side (leave it plumbed to the I/C). 100% legal, better idling...

Of course, I have yet to do this...

ecv?which side is his? inlet or exhuast rocker cover side?

can some post a picture up with this setup..

this sounds like the setup im going to do...

more info on his setup would b great..thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hey guys,

i've just installed a catch can on my RB20DET, and did it the wrong way the first time.

the car was pouring out smoke which smelt like burnt oil, so i read up on this topic and followed SydneyKid's 50% plumback diagram:

rb25det50PlumbBack.jpg

i have a couple symptoms though:

the smoke pouring out the exhaust has stopped, but it still seems to have a very slight smell of burnt oil? i'm thinking maybe it's burning off the last bits from the previous installation?

i also noticed a strange ticking type sound which seems to be coming from the plenum area. the noise stops if i squeeze the hose coming from the plenum enough to stop the flow of air.

i've got a drift oil catch can, with 2 top hose fittings, and 1 lower.

i've used the lower one for the plenum, the top ones for the rocker cover (with the original "u" shaped one intact), and the return line for the intake pipe has been blocked.

does anyone have an idea?

Sydneykid where are you?!

thanks,

dave.

Edited by dmr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

would it make a difference if i block the line going from the rocker cover to the inlet manifold and then run the other 2 lines to the catch can and plumb them back to the turbo inlet or should i run the manifold pipe through the catch can as well and then a return to the manifold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
Thats ok if you just want to remove oil any oil from entering the intercooler but you should ideally plumb the PCV valve line to the catch can too.

I haven't found a way to do it with a catch can that only has 2 ports. The diagram I've seen is for a RB20 and I've read where people say it works differently between the 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'd like to revive this dead thread cause i am confused as hell right now

this is how i have mine hooked up (I got it this way from japan)

tndsc01553rf9.jpg

So i'm thinking about running the atmospheric setup shown on in this thread and putting one of these types of filters between the PCV and the intake manifold, but the one thing that is leaving me in doubt is that some people claim that the atmospheric setup creates a vacuum leak in the system.... So what is it, will it or wont it create a leak?

Catch%20can%20assembly.JPG

i used to use one of those filters on my old car between the pcv and the IM and it worked great, collected allot of oil

Opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to revive this dead thread cause i am confused as hell right now

this is how i have mine hooked up (I got it this way from japan)

tndsc01553rf9.jpg

So i'm thinking about running the atmospheric setup shown on in this thread and putting one of these types of filters between the PCV and the intake manifold, but the one thing that is leaving me in doubt is that some people claim that the atmospheric setup creates a vacuum leak in the system.... So what is it, will it or wont it create a leak?

Catch%20can%20assembly.JPG

i used to use one of those filters on my old car between the pcv and the IM and it worked great, collected allot of oil

Opinions?

I never got a response, so I'm going to run mine similar to yours, but I'll run 2 hoses separately from the valve covers -> T fitting as close as possible to the catch can -> into the catch can + stainless-steel scrubbing -> and out to the intake pipe. I think I'm going to just cap off the PCV valve and the intake manifold nipple.

Edited by Neejay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the way your describing it makes the catch can sound kinda of pointless really but maybe i'm understanding it wrong

and what benefit would capping the pcv valve rather than than putting a filter like i described have? the way i see it, the pcv valve is there for a reason isnt it?

Edited by MoogLe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the way your describing it makes the catch can sound kinda of pointless really but maybe i'm understanding it wrong

and what benefit would capping the pcv valve rather than than putting a filter like i described have? the way i see it, the pcv valve is there for a reason isnt it?

No, it's basically like what you currently have, but instead of the hose going to the other valve cover, it will go straight towards the catch can, then BOTH valve hoses will combine via T fitting right before going into the catch can.

A filter instead of the PCV valve cap will cause fumes and look less clean, in my opinion. I may try to find a plug and just take out the PCV valve all together.

EDIT: If you have a 2nd picture, I can't see it. What filter thing are you talking about?

Edited by Neejay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slap a 460L into the car, send its mum.  
    • So last night pulling away from the lights, I lost power for about 1 second. Bit weird, but I kept driving... 5 minutes later the pump completely dies. When I tried to start the car, the pump won't even prime.  I left the car for about an hour, tried to start it and it all appeared fine. Pump primed, car started, got the fuel pressure I should have.... Start driving home, 5 minutes later it dies again. I'm stuck in a shit spot this time going up hill with a car right behind me, so I just let the car continue to turn over while praying to the fuel pump gods. After about 2 minutes of turning the engine over, the fuel pump came back to life and I got home (only about another 5 min away).  So I've been digging around online, it seems like the 525 fuel pumps really don't like to be run at 100% all the time. I've found quite a few examples online of people killing their Walbro 525 pumps within about a year of usage when they are run without PWM.  So, my pump is an Aeroflow 525 (AF49-1057) and I've been running it at 100% without PWM. I'm thinking the Aeroflow 525 didn't like being run at 100% and has burnt itself up.  I really am sick of dealing with fuel pump issues, my current thoughts are -  1. Use a Walbro 450 and run it without PWM. It seems like these pumps hold up pretty well to being run at 100% all the time. I only make about 350kw and can't see me making any more power any time soon so this is probably a fine option.  2. Get a Walbro 525, run it with PWM. I know doing this will annoy me as I feel like with only 350kw, its extra expense that I don't "need" and I'll be thinking the whole time while setting it up that I should have gone with option 1. I know I'll be happy with this option when its setup and running, its only the initial setup frustration and cost as an issue.  3. Get a Walbro BKS1001 brushless pump. This is the fu*k it I'm already going PWM, might as well go full retard. This option just seems better in every way, with the only downside being cost. But I don't know much about this pump so I could be wrong.  Happy to get everyone's thoughts before I go digging around in the fuel tank again. 
    • Doing it this weekend. For sure this time. Thank you forum gods.  And im running map sensor now with the haltech. Still have the AFMs attached to the mushroom dome shaped air filter things
    • Actually, it is probably pretty legit. I mean, it's still woke feminazi bullshit academia, but you would have to agree that it is very likely that there would be a correlation between wanting a loud exhaust and scoring at the unpleasant end of the scales for dark triad personality traits. The fact that they found it didn't correlate with narcissism and only with psychopathy and sadism definitely shows that the loud exhaust thing is more of a "f**k you" than a "look at me", and I reckon that rings pretty close to most of the dickheads who take it to the extreme. Remember, this is correlation with tendency to be closer to one end of a personality trait scale than the other end. Of course someone who is at the literal opposite end of the psychopathy scale is going to be so considerate of others that they wouldn't even think about wanting to upset anyone with a loud exhaust. So the finding isn't that "you are a psychopath". Just that you score more towards that end of the scale than someone who doesn't like loud exhausts (on average, not necessarily even for specific individuals).
    • Blitz ER34 at some point hopefully, should be allowed in Gr3 if they do.
×
×
  • Create New...